From: <li...@ba...> - 2004-04-09 15:55:12
|
Hi! Joel Ebel "jb...@nc..." wrote: > The problem is that you either have to sacrifice an incrementing > counter, or you sacrifice detection of the first code or two. Without > the toggle_mask, it detects the code immediately, but never increments > the counter. Without the toggle_mask it detects the first part of the code and sends it to the clients. > With the toggle_mask, it increments, but it takes a short > period of time before accepting the code. With the toggle_mask it detects the first part of the code, waits for the second part of the code (which is there for error detection purposes) and only accepts the code if the second part matches the first part. The actual device that is controlled by this remote should behave exactly like that. If not, then your problem might be that you have entered the "second part" of the code in the config file and not the "first part". second = first XOR toggle_mask Christoph |