Re: Xephyr instead of Xnest

[Hugo V. <hvw...@ya...>]

--- Aivils Stoss <ai...@un...> wrote:

> On Otrdiena, 29. Novembris 2005 19:32, Michael
> Pardee wrote:

<snip>

> 
> 	In my opinition in far future better is having
> pointer and keyboard for
> each X screen. X server screen as separate
> workstation from view point
> of end user already solve all troubles notified
> above. 

I agree with that completely.


Most of X device
> drivers support xv, OpenGL hardware acceleration for
> each screen.
> 	One trouble left - X authentification.
> 
> 	In case when xv or 3d hardware accelleration goes
> via another X emulator
> Xnest or Xephyr , then it becames slower. Anybody
> cant test it with
> windows games via Wine or WineX, where emulator
> calls host openGL only.
> Under vmware DirectX hardware accelleration is like
> programmers toy
> but not a practical value.
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com