Re: [Linux-vrf-general] Re: [linux-vrf-general]EACH VRF CAN HAVE ITS OWN ZEBRA DAEMON?

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:28:05PM +0900, Lee Jeong Ho wrote:
> I configured zebra just like the following:
>=20
> ./configure --enable-user=3Droot --enable-group=3Droot --enable-vty-group=
=3Droot --enable-tcp-zebra
>=20
> after "make and make install," I created two vrfs 1 and 2 and assign inte=
rfaces.
> Then, I tried to assign zebra to each vrf.
>=20
> chvrf 1 zebra -d -P 2601
> chvrf 2 zebra -d -P 2602

I would try running each zebra in the forground in different windows and
see what they complain about.

My guess is that you will want to explicitly set the following command
line parameters for each instance of zebra:

--config_file
--pid_file

You shouldn't need to change the port number of each zebra, since they are =
in
seperate VRFs the port should not collide.  Remember to you need to access
each zebra inside the vrf, so to telnet to the zebra port you would do
something like:

    chvrf 1 bash
    telnet 127.0.0.1 2601


>=20
> I can access zebra vty assigned to vrf 1, but I cannot access the second.
>=20
> When I checked the running process with the command "ps -aux | grep zebra=
,"
> I can only see the first one.
>=20
> Is there anything wrong?
> What can I do now?
>=20
> - jeong ho.

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...