You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-20 06:06:52
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2813406 By: nobody Sorry, the second calculation is 'S_VCN*SecPerCluster + lbaofmft' ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-20 02:53:29
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2813270 By: nobody Thanks for your reply Yuval. I could find data run(I don't know whether what I've found can be called data run) as you explained but still I can't get the exact lba for searching file. There are 'Starting VCN' and 'Base File Reference of the Attribute' on the Attribute_List. I tried to proceed more with those value but I couldn't. First, I calculated the lba with 'Base file reference of the attribute'(let say as mftno) through mftno * SecPerMftno + lbaofmft. I could find a File Record through this calculation, and there's $Data attribute and so much data runs exist, but I couldn't proceed more from here cause failed to get the lba what I wanted. Second, I calculated the lba with 'Starting VCN' through S_VCN*SecPerMftno + lbaofmft. I could find a File record but it finished same result of the first. Are those ways correct to find the extension file record what I did ? Is there any other way to access extension file record ? Thanks for your kindness. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-20 02:52:06
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2813269 By: nobody Thanks for your reply Yuval. I could find data run(I don't know whether what I've found can be called data run) as you explained but still I can't get the exact lba for searching file. There are 'Starting VCN' and 'Base File Reference of the Attribute' on the Attribute_List. I tried to proceed more with those value but I couldn't. First, I calculated the lba with 'Base file reference of the attribute'(let say as mftno) through mftno * SecPerMftno + lbaofmft. I could find a File Record through this calculation, and there's $Data attribute and so much data runs exist, but I couldn't proceed more from here cause failed to get the lba what I wanted. Second, I calculated the lba with 'Starting VCN' through S_VCN*SecPerMftno + lbaofmft. I could find a File record but it finished same result of the first. Are those ways correct to find the extension file record what I did ? Is there any other way to access extension file record ? Thanks for your kindness. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-19 07:41:32
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2811610 By: nobody That howto explaines how to use a SOFTWARE RAID, meaning you don't need a RAID controller, but emulating one. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-18 19:10:19
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2810871 By: nobody yeah but then i'd need a RAID Controller-And i don't have one, that's the problem but thank you ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 17:45:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2805210 By: nobody i noticed there are only NTFS rpm's for i586 and i686 for fedora core 2. what about i386 (which is what i have)? will any of the other rpm's work for me? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 12:02:02
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2804446 By: nobody AFAIK you can simply use it as RAID0. Take a look at: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 11:47:56
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2804424 By: uvman You are looking in the wrong place. This is the NTFS forums. A simple google search leads to: http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/linuxdisk/Mount/linuxdisk10.000.html ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 11:41:58
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2804416 By: uvman The $ATTRIBUTE_LIST attribute has its own data run. When there is not enough room for attributes on the mft record, additional space is made avaiable using this attribute. so what you need to do is use this data run to find out where the rest of the attributes are stored on the disk, and parse the rest of the attributes until you find $DATA. There you will find the data run you need. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 10:28:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2804341 By: nobody when i mount the windows file system with command mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 / root/dosc it is displaying hda1 is read-only file. cannot mount. it is write-protected. what should i do. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-14 08:24:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2804183 By: nobody I found that there's $Attribute_List on the FILE Record. This may caused data fragmentation. On this case ($Attribute_List exist) how can I search the Data Runs on the FILE Record for the $DATA ? Thanks in advance. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-13 15:48:30
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2802804 By: nobody Just got a question? Is it possible to mount ntfs stripes? Thanks very much *smile* ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-13 09:55:36
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2802151 By: nobody Hi all, I'm developing a tool that executing on dos. It search a file and make decision whether go further or not. After I update XP sp1, I found an error that the Data runs under $DATA attribute remained onle one. I can't calculate the lba cause there're no more data runs to do it. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-09 15:41:59
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2796505 By: comunerito Hello, I installed the NTFS module on Fedora Core 2, following the instructions at http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/rpm/instructions.html. I am using a dual-boot system with WinXP on hda. When I do the fdisk command, instead of seeing an NTFS partition, there is an EZ-Drive partition (see below) and I can't seem to mount it. Has anyone come across this problem? CD [root@localhost root]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120000000000 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14589 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 1023 8217243 55 EZ-Drive Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/hdb2 14 12761 102398310 83 Linux /dev/hdb3 12762 13016 2048287+ 82 Linux swap /dev/hdb4 13017 14593 12667252+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hdb5 13017 14463 11622996 83 Linux /dev/hdb6 14464 14593 1044193+ 82 Linux swap ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-08 17:51:02
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2795568 By: badc0ffee Looks like I can do this with the userspace tools fls and icat in sleuthkit (see sleuthkit.org) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-08 16:01:41
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2795415 By: flatcap Hi, When compiling the kernel module it's VITALLY important to use exactly the same kernel source and exactly the same kernel config. You may have found the problem I came across recently, that Fedora aren't shipping valid kernel config files in the kernel-sourcecode rpms. If you're using my build-2.6 script, then put a copy of your binary kernel rpm in the current directory and it will use the config from inside. Hope this helps, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-08 01:49:37
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2794465 By: nobody Hi!!! I compile my own rpm from the source the result ..... -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 172138 oct 7 20:44 kernel-ntfs-2.6.8-1.521.x86_64.ko -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 62183 oct 7 20:44 kernel-ntfs-2.6.8-1.521.x86_64.rpm then rpm -Uhv etc.... then modprobe ntfs then mount -t ntfs etc etc then Message from syslogd@KarLost at Thu Oct 7 21:14:52 2004 ... KarLost kernel: Oops: 0000 [2] Message from syslogd@KarLost at Thu Oct 7 21:14:52 2004 ... KarLost kernel: CR2: 000000001d244b7c and crash everything. I'm no able to mount any disk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-10-07 13:07:58
|
hi, On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 15:05, Tobias Herp wrote: > I have accidentally deleted another NTFS partition than I thought I did; > now I have a deleted 57GB NTFS partition which has been partly > overwritten with a 5GB ext3fs partition (1.7GB used) and 2GB swap. There > has not happened very much on these since, so it should be possible to > get back most of my data. > > So, what should I do? > > For security reasons, I reckon it would be wise to create images of the > new partitions (and now unused space). I'd like to avoid to create an > imoage of the entire 120 GB disk, since the affected part covers 57 GB > and I have another 80GB disk in spare which I could use for the image. > > What would happen if I just deleted the new partitions and > re-established the deleted NTFS partition without (long-) formatting > it?. Is there a tool which would help me to get data back from this? No if you did a format it would destroy all your existing metadata and that would be very bad. However you should delete the partition and recreate it as it was before (using fdisk for example) but do NOT format it. You might then be able to mount it with the Linux ntfs driver with the on_errors=recover mount option. IF that fails you can try to just get data back with any of the recovery programs available on the net. You might want to try TestDisk for example. (http://www.cgsecurity.org/index.html?testdisk.html) You could also try running chkdsk on the drive but windows might well wipe everything instead of fixing it. And of course you can pay someone to get what data there is left back. Hope this helps. Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/, http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-03 18:39:10
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2787173 By: szaka I don't know what you mean by "easy way" but if you read the the manual or ntfsresize output then you can see that not providing the size will resize NTFS to the full available partition size, exactly what you want. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-10-02 22:33:06
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2786449 By: nobody Hello! Is there any easy way to enlarge ntfs filesystem on partition to the full available size of the partition? I don't want to have to type in some approximate numbers -- can't there be a switch or similar to tell ntfsresize to use whole space of the partition? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-29 11:03:26
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2780949 By: szaka Same answer: no need for merge them on a storage. The recovery can work on-the-fly: <your_software> | ntfsclone --restore-image --overwrite <device> - The <your_software> can be anything, for example doing this 1) asking the user to put in the CD 2) check the CD is the correct one 3) read to CD and write to stdout for ntfsclone 4) if not all CD were processed then goto 1) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-29 01:18:41
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2780415 By: nobody Would it be possible to restore one portion of the file at a time? If the image is split across CDs, without a large ramdrive, there wouldn't be enough room to merge the files then restore them. Unless I knew before hand that the computer had 2 hard drives and only one was being restored. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-28 18:03:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2779735 By: nobody >> if i understand the steps: >> 1) mount the ntfs part RW using the driver from >linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net >No, that would be the complicated way. In tis case >you should loopback >mount a pre-created huge file as a Linux filesystem. >The same way as >TopologiLinux runs read-write from NTFS and some Live >distros use home, >config files on NTFS partitions. ! i am missing something.. i thought that all the "captive" or "linux-ntfs ntfs driver" thing was to let linux RW-understand NTFS partitions.. so if TopologiLinux writes on NTFS what are the other tools for? sorry... :-) could you.. just..? hi M@®{o ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-28 12:02:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2779267 By: matzmann I would be quite interested in the answer to this question, too! (The 2.4.26 can be applied to 2.4.27, but the module is not loadable due to missing symbols [which are there!?]) Regards Matthias ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-28 09:51:11
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2779135 By: szaka 'split' creates 'sort'-able files by name. By default 'ls' sorts files by name and cat can maerge them. So one possible way is: cat `/bin/ls` | ntfsclone --restore-image --overwrite device - ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
