You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-06 17:46:23
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2926265 By: ndcent The current NTFS driver does not support much in the way of writing. Therefore, if you are trying to upload to the NTFS partition through Samba (or any other network service) you will recieve sort of error. I would suggest making the mount read-only to prevent errors or data loss and corruption. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-06 16:40:55
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2926167 By: flatcap Can you put a binary copy of that mft record somewhere public, or failing that, post a hex dump of the entire record. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-06 16:28:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2926153 By: nobody thank you for your answer. i think i have remove the fixup when read mft. it same this runs to be absolutely address , not relative address in some coditions. BTW, this file has non resident 20 attribute and have many 80 attributes in the 20 attribute ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-06 13:35:37
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2925870 By: flatcap Usually this means you've forgotten to remove the fixup. Have a read of this and see if it helps: http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ntfs/concepts/fixup.html Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-06 10:07:23
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2925639 By: nobody hello i find some strange runs when i say compressed file's runs on XP. .......... 07 10 01 09 12 0E 01 10 01 02 21 5D 10 01 01 03 "31 09 D0 D5 02 01 07" 11 05 10 01 0B 11 0A 10 01........... here should be start = 0x2d570 + 0x2d5d0, but it really should be start=0x2d5d0, why ? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-05 20:48:10
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2924969 By: nobody After I have successfully mounted ntfs volume, I want it avaible in samba share. So, everything goes ok - I can see this share and browse it, but I can't upload any file (for example, "Telefon/SETUP.STF") from mounted ntfs volume --------error in samba log--------- [2005/01/05 23:40:04, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) 172.16.114.19 (172.16.114.19) connect to service XpMount initially as user samba (uid=102, gid=65534) (pid 1074) [2005/01/05 23:40:04, 0] smbd/reply.c:send_file_readX(2134) send_file_readX: sendfile failed for file Telefon/SETUP.STF (Invalid argument). Terminating [2005/01/05 23:40:04, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837) 172.16.114.19 (172.16.114.19) closed connection to service XpMount --------error in samba log--------- ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-05 04:10:07
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2923729 By: gregnewton ...and RTFM (the GRUB FM, that is). Say, start with section 4.2.6... ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-29 20:00:29
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2915944 By: nobody Really useful information. Thanks Rich ! Nicolas ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-28 21:10:53
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2914547 By: ndcent First, this REALLY isn't the right place for this post. Second, Before anyone can help you, you'll need to say what versions of Windows you're trying to run. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-25 13:25:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2911730 By: nobody I`d like to use grub as first bootloader, but i cant. The problem is that grub can only boot active windows partition, if i try to boot inactive windows partition i got an error message (missing COMMAND.COM) How can i make inactive partition visible for grub ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-23 07:18:05
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2909590 By: ndcent I've had fairly good luck with 2.6.9 personally, but I did not use any of the previous 2.6.x releases. Also, no one is forcing you to use 2.6.9: you could use 2.6.7 or 2.6.4 if you'd like. And as you probably know, 2.6.10 will be out shortly. Although this is not the place for this discussion, I'd be interested to hear exactly what your complaints are with the 2.6.9 kernel. Being that over 99% of the code is THE SAME, I would bet that the problems are based more in an inability to properly configure the kernel than anything else. If you do continue to use the 2.4.x series, I have unfortunate news: New patches and backports are not coming. The man-power just does not exist with our current team to sustain versions for both series kernel. As this is an open-source project, I would encourage you, or anyone else reading this, to download the source and backport it for us. Then contribute the code back to us so that others may benifit from your hard work. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-22 06:47:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2907973 By: rlaager Using a 2.6.9 kernel from Fedora Core 2, I'm able to mount my Windows XP Pro NTFS partition. Everythings works as desired except for filenames (both for files and directories) that contain @ are garbled... For example: rl...@wi... becomes rlaager2605163265 This is stable across boots between both operating systems. I don't know if the filename changes when the file is modified (from Windows). I've tried playing with the iocharset, nls, and utf8=true options with no luck. Is there anything I can do to fix this? What additional debugging information would be useful? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-17 08:34:51
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2900907 By: nobody Use Captive or paragon NTFS driver (doesn't work under 2.6.x) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-17 08:32:30
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2900904 By: nobody because 2.6.9 sucks COMPLETELY. Most of my friends who are using 2.6 stick with 2.6.7 or 2.6.4 releases. Two of them tried 2.6.9. Both said that it's a bullsh*t. Sorry but once again 2.6.9 became nothing but a highly development alpha version. It's not even beta. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-15 12:28:01
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2897435 By: nobody the NTFS driver is read-only right now. the only write support that exists is to change the contents of a file. you cannot create, move, rename, or delete files. you cannot modify permissions on files. you can read them, or (with write support enabled) change their contents. no more. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-15 01:08:25
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2896830 By: nobody I am having this same problem, when i tried changing permissions under root is says i can because it is a read only file system, so i tried disabling the read-only bit on the drive in windows, no such luck, anyone know how to change permissions on an ntfs drive? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-14 16:42:39
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2896048 By: szaka How much memory do you have? It's quite normal if the sync takes longer and you have a lot of memory and slower network. The kernel caches a lot of data (they don't go immediately to the wire) and only sync pushes them out to the network. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-14 16:29:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2896030 By: stormy_waters Hello there, I am current trying to image a NTFS partition ( Windows XP ), and it's being wrote to a samba share ( Win2k ), via smbfs on a 2.6.9 kernel. My Command is as follows: ntfsclone --save-imgae --output - /dev/sdb2 | ../split.pl. Split.pl I will post later, But i'm doubting he's the culprit. It's a 120gb sata drive that's got a 40gb partition, that's only about 5gb full. All split does is break the file into chunks (512mb), for joining later. What's happens is this ntfs clone will run get threw all of it's stuff get down to "Syncing ..." and locks up. The image itself is being wrote to a smbfs mounted drive (which i doubt is the culprit also) . So if anyone has any suggestions please feel free. --Split.pl-- #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; my $file_counter = 1; # since simple way to start 'em my $filesize = "512"; #in mega bytes # 1000000 bytes in 1 mega byte my $image_prefix = "image."; my $byte_counter = 0; binmode STDIN; my $buffer; my $buffer_read_size = 1000; my $return_value; if (defined($ARGV[0])) { $image_prefix = $ARGV[0]; } open(FILEHANDLE,">$image_prefix".$file_counter); binmode(FILEHANDLE); while(defined($return_value = sysread(STDIN,$buffer,$buffer_read_size,0))) { if ($return_value != 0) #meaning there's some data in the buffer { $byte_counter += $return_value; if($byte_counter >= $filesize*1000000) { syswrite(FILEHANDLE, $buffer, $return_value); close(FILEHANDLE); $file_counter += 1; open(FILEHANDLE,">$image_prefix".$file_counter); binmode(FILEHANDLE); $byte_counter = 0; }else{ syswrite(FILEHANDLE, $buffer, $return_value); } } } close(FILEHANDLE); ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-14 14:11:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2895629 By: nobody Hi all, I have mounted a NTFS partion //target //mymnt ntfs rw,umask=0022,uid=me,gid=me 0 0 After run ls -la I learn that I have permission to write as root I have am using Fedora core 3 Kernel is 2.6.9-1.681 Jason ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-10 23:35:11
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2891190 By: nobody I have SUSE 9.2 PRO and I'm able to see all my other partitions ,which are NTFS,including Win2K,WinXP,another for documents and stuff,another for MP3s and the last is for Videos only.So far I have been able to open/copy any file and folders on them and unable to write/modify anything.Does this distro come with an option to write/modify files on NTFS partition that just needs to be configured to do so or does any other driver allow for that without damaging the current setup of the OS? Anyone? Thanks. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-08 14:22:29
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2887047 By: nobody If I do so, it will not mount too, can someone give me the command how to mand my /dev/hdb5? /dev/hdb5 79768 159535 40202631 e W95 FAT16 (LBA) thx Steven ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-08 10:17:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2886820 By: nobody I think You may not include the uid and gid! Try with default only Sam Chu ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-07 16:44:17
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2885494 By: nobody about this partition /dev/hdb5 79768 159535 40202631 e W95 FAT16 (LBA) I still cannot mount it I have tried fat vfat auto PS what is the maximum numvber of mount partition be( I may reach, I have mount 4 this is the 5th) this is my command line in /etc/fstab /dev/hdb5 /mnt/window/Room5 auto ro,umask=0222,uid=flatcap,gid=steven 0 0 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-07 16:13:32
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2885434 By: flatcap FAT16, I didn't know anyone still used that. Try "-t fat". "ro" = readonly, equivalent to "-r" "umask" changes the file permissions ignore the two 0's Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) PS If you have any more simple questions I recommend google. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-07 15:59:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2885418 By: flatcap /dev/hdb2 isn't a real partition, it's a container for other partitions (those with numbers larger than 4). Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
