You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-16 16:20:39
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2999682 By: ekuns I think the complaint is not the FILE name, but that you cannot do the following: rpm -q kernel-module-ntfs That means to do an "rpm -qi" of the NTFS module, I first have to "rpm -qa | grep kernel-module-ntfs" and that is kind of klunky. The rpm FILE name is fine and perfect, but it would be very helpful if "rpm -q kernel-module-ntfs" would list all versions of this RPM that are installed. Does the naming standard you refer to actually require that the kernel version be part of the internal name as well? The current naming scheme does not allow you to upgrade unless a new version of this module is released for a kernel that it was already released for. But if you upgrade your kernel, you cannot then upgrade this module. You have to install a new version from scratch. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-13 19:39:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2993920 By: flatcap Hi Orion, In the last two years, I've been through hundreds of combinations of smart rpms, stupid rpms, dependencies, no dependencies and naming conventions. Would it be possible to change the ntfs rpm naming/versioning scheme to allow > for automatic updates to new kernel versions when they are installed? > No. The naming convention is the current "standard" for kernel modules. kernel-module-ntfs-2.6.10-1.760_FC3-2.1.22-0.rr.4.3.i586.rpm kernel-module A kernel module ntfs Name 2.6.10 Linux kernel version 1.760_FC3 RedHat release smp (Optional) kernel modifier 2.1.22 NTFS driver version 0 Epoch rr Vendor (Richard Russon) 4 Spec file version 3 Distro version (2 = FC2, 3 = FC3) i586 Architecture rpm File type but because the kernel version is part of the package name, > this doesn't work for keeping the ntfs driver up to date. > The problem comes if you have more than one kernel type installed. We use yum to keep our Fedora systems up to date, > Sourceforge have recently made some changes to their file release system. Soon I may be able to create directories in the release area. If I can do that, then I can create a yum repository, directly. Also, shouldn't the rpm depend on the kernel package it is compiled for? > That would make sense, but it breaks certain update programs that don't expect the kernel to be a dependency for something else. Finally, I'm limited by sourceforge. Their file release mechanisms won't allow me to make widespread re-releases. Since they are providing a HUGE amount of storage and bandwidth (for free), I can't exactly change my hosting. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-13 19:02:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2993886 By: opoplawski Would it be possible to change the ntfs rpm naming/versioning scheme to allow for automatic updates to new kernel versions when they are installed? Currently this must be done by hand, which is very clunky. We use yum to keep our Fedora systems up to date, but because the kernel version is part of the package name, this doesn't work for keeping the ntfs driver up to date. Also, shouldn't the rpm depend on the kernel package it is compiled for? Thanks! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-11 17:17:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2991384 By: nobody It is a sparse file? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-11 15:29:10
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2990989 By: nobody Hi, I ran follow command: ntfsinfo -d "/dev/sdc1" -F "WINDOWS/PCHEALTH/ErrorRep/UserDumps/IEXPLORE.EXE.20041203-141448-00.hdmp" -v -f, and it gave me negative LCN for this file! Using locale 'en_US.UTF-8'. The device /dev/sdc1, is mounted. Forced to continue. Dumping Inode #10281 Update Sequence Array Count: 3 $LogFile seqNum for this Inode: 0x405f21d Number of times reused: 1 Number of hard links: 2 MFT record Flags: Size - Used: 728 bytes Size - Allocated: 1024 bytes Next Attribute Instance Num 5 Dumping attribute $STANDARD_INFORMATION (0x10) File Creation Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 File Altered Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:53 2004 MFT Changed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:53 2004 Last Accessed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:53 2004 Max Number of Versions: 0 Version Number: 0 Class ID: 0 User ID: 0 Security ID: 392 Dumping attribute $FILE_NAME (0x30) File Name: 'IEXPLO~1.HDM' File Name Length: 12 Allocated File Size: 0 Real File Size: 0 File Creation Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 File Altered Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 MFT Changed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 Last Accessed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 Dumping attribute $FILE_NAME (0x30) File Name: 'IEXPLORE.EXE.20041203-141448-00.hdmp' File Name Length: 36 Allocated File Size: 0 Real File Size: 0 File Creation Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 File Altered Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 MFT Changed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 Last Accessed Time: Fri Dec 3 09:14:48 2004 Dumping attribute $DATA (0x80) related info Stream name: unnamed Flags: 0x0001 Is resident? No Data size: 2214733 Allocated size: 2228224 Initialized size: 2214733 Compression unit: 4 Compressed size: 716800 Runlist: VCN LCN Length 0 291194 5 5 -1 11 16 291187 4 20 -1 12 32 39540 6 38 -1 10 48 137199 7 55 -1 9 64 137408 7 71 -1 9 80 137440 7 87 -1 9 96 138304 6 102 -1 10 112 406094 2 114 -1 14 128 139567 5 133 -1 11 144 406112 3 147 -1 29 176 406115 1 177 -1 15 192 140650 7 199 -1 9 208 142059 6 214 -1 10 224 406148 7 231 -1 9 240 368667 9 249 -1 7 256 368676 7 263 -1 9 272 142812 7 279 -1 9 288 142906 7 295 -1 9 304 143090 7 311 -1 9 320 143146 7 327 -1 9 336 146676 6 342 -1 10 352 147493 5 357 -1 11 368 149202 4 372 -1 12 384 150260 4 388 -1 12 400 150727 4 404 -1 12 416 150957 5 421 -1 11 432 157278 6 438 -1 10 448 22077 10 458 -1 6 464 158057 4 468 -1 12 480 158087 4 484 -1 12 496 158151 4 500 -1 12 512 291199 1 513 -1 15 528 139572 1 529 -1 15 End of inode reached ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-11 14:04:03
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2990854 By: nobody thanks ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-10 22:47:48
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2990004 By: uvman The "-f" option SHOULD not do anything at all to a mounted volume in the ntfsinfo case. Dirty volumes may have damaged structure and the user should be fully aware that the utility may give wrong results or crash, and this is why the "-f" flag exists. A read-write utility is more serious than ntfsinfo in the case of dirty volumes and the "-f" option should be treated accordingly. When a volume is mounted it is dirty, and the only way to use ntfsinfo is with the "-f" flag. I use it all the time and yet nothing bad happened, but no one can not take responsibility in case it will erase you entire drive or worse. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-10 18:19:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2989525 By: nobody What would "-f" option do to a mounted volume? Anything bad? Thanks, ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-10 14:38:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2988957 By: nobody Hi: Can anybody tell me why the ntfsinfo command complains when the ntfs volume is mounted already? Why the command does not like to work with a mounted volume? Thanks, ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-10 04:46:35
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2988261 By: nobody Try Diskprobe.exe it is in Microsofts own Windows resource kit for XP. Look on your XP CD, on the "Support tools" CD (the second CD that comes with XP), or on the download pages at microsoft.com . Chances are it is in one of those places. If you have MSDN or Technet, the full set of RK tools is on one of the CDs/DVDs. If you can't find diskprobe and can't afford the RK another trick is to take a generic hex editor (and point it to the pseudo-filenames \.\C: or \.\PhysicalDisk0 etc. Unless the hex editor actively stops you, this brings up the whole C: partition or entire first HD). ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-06 20:40:34
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2981191 By: nobody runtime.org recoverd all 80 gigs nicely (-: ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-06 20:39:29
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2981190 By: nobody Well not exactly pooched ...runtime.org solved my problems. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-06 17:55:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2981031 By: szaka Our NTFS resizer included in over 50 CD's (Mandrake, SUSE, Knoppix, Debian, Novell, SystemRescueCD, etc). Just download, burn and use one of them. More hints are at http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/ntfsresize.html ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-06 17:16:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2980977 By: nobody I have a PC with Windows XP Pro installed on it with NTFS. I want to put RedHat Linux 9 on it. I tried using the RH9 installation CD, but Disk Druid on the installation CD would not resize the NTFS partition to make room for linux. So I'm thinking of creating a CD-R to boot from (so I don't have to buy Partition Magic) What do I need to put on a CD-R in order to be able to resize this hard drive to make room for linux? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-05 23:37:06
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2980322 By: nobody Thank you for your answers. Maybe this kind of questions belongs on the devel-list(?) Once again: Thank you. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-05 23:33:09
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2980318 By: nobody Hi! In the file $Secure, the documentation says: -How is the Security Hash generated? Does anybody have further knowledge of this, as of today? I guess it is of importance to ntfs3.x write-support(?) Thank You! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-04 03:11:21
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2977368 By: nobody Hi there: Just wanted to let you know that your kernel module helped me get out of a sticky spot, recovering data off the hard-drive of a failed laptop, in conjunction with the Fedora Core 3 rescue CD. "NTFS Kernel Modules (*.o) You almost certainly don't want these downloads. They are here for the sake of completeness. " I wanted exactly that, and it was perfect! Thank you guys for your hard work. It is appreciated. k ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-03 20:18:49
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2976660 By: nobody (-: ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-03 20:14:39
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2976654 By: nobody Is there any way I can recover the data or is it absolutely lost forever more? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-03 20:09:19
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2976640 By: nobody Under linux I mounted the NTFS drive as rw, and attempted to write. Needless to say my data is now lost. Windows reports that the drive is no longer formated. Can anyone recommend a way I might be able to recover the data? Thanks, Kris ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-03 02:42:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2974976 By: nobody why does theWinXP chkdsk alway check for file sytem contegrity when i reboot from linux straight into WinXP? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-01 18:36:55
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2971927 By: nobody Hmm..i think, that disassembling any driver is a complex task. There are questions to developers. How i can obtain call tree fro existing driver? maybe compiling with other options?? which tools i need to use? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-30 08:40:48
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2967255 By: nobody Greate=great )) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-30 08:40:03
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2967253 By: nobody ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-01-30 08:37:51
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2967251 By: nobody I have greate news for you.First, i try to disassemble ntfs.sys but have no succes. Next, i found Paragon drivers for linux. Shareware version can read ntfs only. But, when i disassembled it (it was .a archive with .o files, which easily linked to .so) i discovered, that thereare write functions, but they are not referenced nowhere. Also, there are many-many function, which can help you. Please contact me by email (marik at yandex dot ru). i give you .so, IDA Pro database, full asm sources and my comments. As a gift, developers was not strip names from libs, so nm --demangle great help us. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
