linux-igd-devel — List for the Linux UPnP Internet Gateway Device developers

[Linux-igd-devel] Letting the IGD fill in the external port number on a addPortMapping request

[Philip P. <phi...@re...>]

If I send a port mapping request with the external host and port unspecified, the internal host and port specified, the description and duration set...

Will linux-igd (1) set up a wildcard mapping (any external host) and (2) assign me an unused external port #?

Because I want to avoid a race condition where two or more hosts all try to allocate the same external port # with a wildcard mapping...

Thanks,

-Philip

[Linux-igd-devel] New features for linux-igd 1.0?

[Philip P. <phi...@re...>]

I need to make a couple of changes to linux-igd and wanted to get some advice as I'm unfamiliar with the code.

First off, can we explicitly add the multicast route from main.c rather than relying on it in the rc script? For that matter, do we even need to set it? I thought the setsockopt(..., IP_ADD_MULTICAST...) took care of all of that?

Second, using getifaddrs() is a little more portable than opening a socket, etc.

Third, I think some patching is required to include the correct nf_nat_xxx header files on 2.6.32 and later kernels.

Here's a patch for the 2nd issue.

-Philip

[Linux-igd-devel] Hello from Project Founder.....

[Glover G. <glo...@us...>]

Hi all,

I realize it's been an eternity since I've been involved with Linux
IGD.  As you can see from the signature, I've been busy working on my
degree.  Now that I have some time, I will be working to update the
website, and start reviewing code again.  Since I last posted, the IGD
interface has moved to version 1.1 (from 1.0), and thanks to the help
of loyal developers, a couple versions were release, including a 1.0
with libupnp support.  I hope to review these changes and do a bit of
cleanup and testing, and hopefully release these changes before the
end of the year.

Due to my lack of memory, I have removed each of the past developers
who had CVS access.  If you are reading this, and you would like to
regain this access, please send me an email and we'll get you set back
up.  Anyone else who wishes to join the project is free to send me a
request anytime.

Please note, that I will be changing references to myself on the
website, and the project to represent my real name in the future.  In
the past, I have been known as Dime.   For all of those who didn't
already know that, "Nice to meet you!" :D

Thanks for your time, and hope to talk to all of you soon.
-- 
Glover George, Ph.D.
Academic Systems Administrator
School of Computing
The University of Southern Mississippi
118 College Drive #5106
Hattiesburg, MS 39406
glo...@us...
(601) 266-5679

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] About linux igd

[Nektarios K. P. <npa...@in...>]

jimmy wrote:
> Hi Nek:

Hi Jimmy,
>    I have tried to send to igd-devel 
> lin...@li... ,but my mail server
> replied me that igd-devel mail server has some SMTP problem, so my mail 
> server can't
> send the mail. I don't know if this was my school mail server's problem 
> or igd's.  But i did receive igd-devel's
> info mail when i subscribe the mailing list. It's very weird... I will 
> try to ask our school's mail administrator for that.
...so for the time being I'll keep the ml CC'd in my replies (for the record)

>    Except that, I am willing to announce any issue i found or patch. Is 
> there any way to post infomation to igd-devel ? Web forum ?
You can find the linux-igd forums here[1], I guess 'Help' is the better place to
post messages.

Regarding issues/patches there is the project Tracker[2], you can use 'Bugs' or
'Patches' respectively.

> And I am wondering, is everyone can merge their code to igd's CVS ?
There are a couple of developers with commit access to the CVS, but they of
course work on the project on a volunteer basis. So, you can't tell when they'll
be available to review and merge you patch.

> 
> Actually, I don't know how to use command, CVS address, and what's worst 
You mean you can't check out the code ? Or that you can not commit your changes?

If the former, then there are good instructions here[3].

If the later, then it is normal. You can't! Only the developers[4] of the
project can ;-)

> is that I am using igd version 1.0 ,
> and add lot's of debug messages, and manually merged your patch to it 
> instead of using command
> "patch" to patch : (
My patch is against an older version and would not apply cleanly on 1.0.

> 
>  Thanks you for sending me your patch for the problem "closing tag", 
> originally I modified it
> via replacing && with  ||
> 
> && (bool_enabled = GetFirstDocumentItem(ca_event->ActionRequest, 
> "NewEnabled") )
> || desc = GetFirstDocumentItem(ca_event->ActionRequest, 
> "NewPortMappingDescription"))
This would be wrong. It would effectively disable all other checks in case that
desc is not NULL.

> 
> But when i saw your patch, i found yours is better and safer.
> 
> By the way, Did you notice that after run a period of time (for me, when 
> I leave school in the night, next day it always crash.),
> igd will cause memory leak, and system crash?  It happens whenever I am 
> using tools to verify or not.
> I searched that in the devel forum and google, some users have same 
> problem, but no one knows the root cause exactly .
> Do you have any idea about that ?
To be honest, I actively worked with igd a lot time ago. Back then I didn't
notice such crashes, but never got the chance to extensively test the current
version.

> 
> Regards
> Jimmy
> 
Cheers,
Nek

[1]http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=52728
[2]http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=52728
[3]http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=52728
[4]http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=52728

-- 
nek

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] About linux igd

[Nektarios K. P. <npa...@in...>]

Hi Jimmy,

glad you found my patch useful. BTW, did you merge it in CVS-HEAD?

Regarding your new comment, you are correct this is a bug in linux-igd.

However, I'm afraid that modifying GetFirstDocumentItem will not help you mutch.
 Looking at the code, it seems that the problem is deeper in pupnp libixml,
implementation and that ixmlDocument_getElementsByTagName does not return the
node at all.

Actually, I have the impression that I've seen such reports about ixml before,
but I can't find the reference.

Nevertheless, as a work around you can move the check for 'desc' out of the 'if'
at the beginning of AddPortMapping and modify pmlist.c accordingly. See attached
patches agains CVS-HEAD.

Meanwhile, I'll investigate the status of ixmlDocument_getElementsByTagName and
if I can't provide a fix will at least make a proper bug report in pupnp ;-)

cheers,
nek

PS. I CC'd the list again since I believe this is of interest to all. BTW, if
you do post on the list you don't need to CC' me, since I'm subscribed.

jimmy wrote:
> Hi nek:
>    Thanks for previuos "UDN" patch you have done, it works  : )
>    Now I found another issue.
> 
>    I am using Intel too IntelToolsForUPnPTechnology_v2.NET 1.0_2777 to 
> test,
> When I invoke addportmapping, igd return 500 Internal Server Error,
> Below is the ethereal log, look the XML tag
> 
> <NewPortMappingDescription />
> 
> It only has closing tag without opening tag and any content. And igd 
> takes it as incorrect (in gatedevice.c, function AddPortMapping() )
> but in UPnP-DeviceArchitecture-v1.0.pdf, it say it's valid,
> 
> "If an action has no “in” arguments, it is valid to combine the opening 
> and closing XML tags (e.g., “<actionname/>” instead of
> “<actionname></actionname>”)."
> 
> 
>    Thus, I am trying to modified and do more test.I think it maybe need 
> to modify function GetFirstDocumentItem .
> 
>    Hope this info is helpful  for you
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jimmy
> ***************************************************************
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> 
> <s:Envelope s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" 
> xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
> 
>   <s:Body>
> 
>      <u:AddPortMapping 
> xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
> 
>         <NewRemoteHost>168.95.1.1</NewRemoteHost>
> 
>         <NewExternalPort>3000</NewExternalPort>
> 
>         <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
> 
>         <NewInternalPort>3000</NewInternalPort>
> 
>         <NewInternalClient>192.168.0.100</NewInternalClient>
> 
>         <NewEnabled>1</NewEnabled>
> 
>         <NewPortMappingDescription />
> 
>         <NewLeaseDuration>0</NewLeaseDuration>
> 
>      </u:AddPortMapping>
> 
>   </s:Body>
> 

-- 
______________________________________________________________
Nektarios K. Papadopoulos
Senior Engineer
Home Automation Group
inAccess Networks
______________________________________________________________

[Linux-igd-devel] [Fwd: Linux IGD with multiple WAN interfaces (first attempt)]

[ArcosCom L. U. <li...@ar...>]

Perhaps somebody want's to take a view into this.

Regards

---------------------------- Mensaje original ----------------------------
Asunto: Linux IGD with multiple WAN interfaces (first attempt)
De:     "ArcosCom Linux User" <li...@ar...>
Fecha:  Mie, 24 de Octubre de 2007, 22:10
Para:   lin...@li...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi guys.

I'm working in a "multiple interfaces" support for linux-igd.
I have not a libupnp knowledgement, but I tried to allow, at least, upnpd
daemon to create FORWARD and PREROUTING rules to allow multiple
interfaces.

I attach the patch against the today CVS version.

The changes I made are:
   1) Changelog (obviously).
   2) upnpd.rc file (to allow the new switches).
   3) Better command line support.
   4) Changes into struct GLOBAL to allow interfaces arrays (very basic).
   5) Changes into pmlist_AddPortMapping to allow the adding rules.
   6) Changes into pmlist_DeletePortMapping to allow the deleting rules.

Perhaps the information sent by the upnpd to the clients will be wrong,
because I don't touch the libupnp callings because I don't know how to do
it (at least by the moment), but I think that the correct rules will be
inserted to allow multiple WAN interfaces.

I think, the next step is to review the libupnp callings to allow this one
and to allow multiple LAN interfaces support.

I need someone test these cases:
   1) If work fine the IPTABLES rules to allow the multiple WAN interfaces.

I can steel working on this if someone help me with:
   1) Some explanation on how to allow "upnpd" to listen over multiple LAN
interfaces, each one in diferent IP subnetwork.
   2) How will be the multicast routing done in this case.

Please, I need some feedback if anybody wants to see multiple wan
interface working someday!!

Regards

[Linux-igd-devel] Do we like the same books?

[rosfran <ro...@gm...>]

Just a friendly reminder that I invited you to Shelfari. Come see the books=
 I love and see if we have any in common. Then pick my next book so I can=
 keep on reading.=0A=0AClick below to join my group of friends on Shelfari!=
=0A=0Ahttp://www.shelfari.com/Register.aspx?ActivityId=3D22687781&InvitationCode=3Ded754831-ea5c-442f-936d-6ae2c9f60cbc=
=0A=0Arosfran=0A=0AShelfari is a free site that lets you share book ratings=
 and reviews with friends and meet people who have similar tastes in books.=
  It also lets you build an online bookshelf, join book clubs, and get good=
 book recommendations from friends.  You should check it out.=0A=0A--------=
=0A=0AYou have received this email because rosfran (ro...@gm...) directly=
 invited you to join his/her community on Shelfari.=0A=0AIt is against Shelfari's=
 policies to invite people who you don't know directly. Follow this link=
 (http://www.shelfari.com/actions/emailoptout.aspx?email=3Dl...@li...&activityid=3D22687781)=
 to prevent future invitations to this address. If you believe you do not=
 know this person, you may view (http://www.shelfari.com/rosfran) his/her=
 Shelfari page or report him/her in our feedback (http://www.shelfari.com/Feedback.aspx)=
 section.=0A=0AShelfari, 616 1st Ave #300, Seattle, WA 98104=0A

[Linux-igd-devel] Do we like the same books?

[rosfran <ro...@gm...>]

I just joined Shelfari to connect with other book lovers. Come see the books=
 I love and see if we have any in common. Then pick my next book so I can=
 keep on reading.=0A=0AClick below to join my group of friends on Shelfari!=
=0A=0Ahttp://www.shelfari.com/Register.aspx?ActivityId=3D21904190&InvitationCode=3Ded754831-ea5c-442f-936d-6ae2c9f60cbc=
=0A=0Arosfran=0A=0AShelfari is a free site that lets you share book ratings=
 and reviews with friends and meet people who have similar tastes in books.=
  It also lets you build an online bookshelf, join book clubs, and get good=
 book recommendations from friends.  You should check it out.=0A=0A--------=
=0A=0AYou have received this email because rosfran (ro...@gm...) directly=
 invited you to join his/her community on Shelfari.=0A=0AIt is against Shelfari's=
 policies to invite people who you don't know directly. Follow this link=
 (http://www.shelfari.com/actions/emailoptout.aspx?email=3Dl...@li...&activityid=3D21904190)=
 to prevent future invitations to this address. If you believe you do not=
 know this person, you may view (http://www.shelfari.com/rosfran) his/her=
 Shelfari page or report him/her in our feedback (http://www.shelfari.com/Feedback.aspx)=
 section.=0A=0AShelfari, 616 1st Ave #300, Seattle, WA 98104=0A

[Linux-igd-devel] Checked in bugfixes and new features

[Magnus H. <mhy...@us...>]

Hi,

I have checked in some bugfixes and new features:

2007-06-30 Magnus Hyllander <mhy...@us...>
  * Added the listenport option, which lets you select which UPnP port
    to listen to. The port number is passed to UpnpInit when
    initializing the UPnP library. This is useful if you are running
    several UPnP services on your firewall, and only specific ports
    have been opened. Gmediaserver has this option also, for example.

  * Renamed the insert_forward_rules option to create_forward_rules to
    better reflect what it actually does. Fixed the erroneous
    description of the option.

  * Added the forward_rules_append to do what people thought
    insert_forward_rules did, i.e. control whether to append or insert
    rules in the forward chain. The option description also includes a
    tip about what to do if neither insert or append is what you
    need.

  * Fixed pmlist_AddPortMapping. It was doing different things when
    using iptables or iptc to create rules. The iptc method was
    inserting in the forward chain and appending to the prerouting
    chain, while the iptables method was doing the opposite. Now both
    methods append to the prerouting chain, and forward_rules_append
    controls whether to insert or append to the forward chain.
    
  * Added trace output when using iptc to add and delete rules
    (for debug_mode=3).

  * Fixed the parsing of the create_forward_rules and
    forward_rules_append options. The regular expression just wouldn't
    take "no" for an answer :-)



/Magnus

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Okay, I'll email you patches if I find some problems.
> Is that okay?

Yes, if you submit patches to the SF project and ping me, I'll
integrate them and cut a test release. Last time, I was trying to
apply the autotooling patches, but started having to rebase them
(files have moved around and all) and ran out of time...

If you can get this straightened out, I'll put time aside to integrate
this and other patches and cut a test release.

Thanks,
  Daniel

> Bjarke
>
> Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > Hi Bjarke,
> >
> > I'll do what I can.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> >> Hey Daniel.
> >>
> >> Any chance of you getting some more time during the summer you think? :)
> >>
> >> Bjarke
> >>
> >> Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >>> Hi Bjarke,
> >>>
> >>> It would be a shame, yes!
> >>>
> >>> All my time is maxed out with work and research right now, so it's
> >>> difficult to get time in on this. I intend to crank out the move to
> >>> subversion, integrate patches and cut a test release at some point,
> >>> but just don't know when...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>   Dan
> >>>
> >>> On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> >>>> Hey.
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
> >>>> so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?
> >>>>
> >>>> It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(
> >>>>
> >>>> Bjarke
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGd82yO+Ewtpi9rLERAqsAAKCR9Pv+Y6Vez43Nn5CqXQiLWr8JxQCdEtYX
> 951Epjdk4sX+zI4XYTFEnSQ=
> =ebW1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>


-- 
Daniel J Blueman

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Okay, I'll email you patches if I find some problems.
Is that okay?

Bjarke

Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Hi Bjarke,
> 
> I'll do what I can.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
>> Hey Daniel.
>>
>> Any chance of you getting some more time during the summer you think? :)
>>
>> Bjarke
>>
>> Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>>> Hi Bjarke,
>>>
>>> It would be a shame, yes!
>>>
>>> All my time is maxed out with work and research right now, so it's
>>> difficult to get time in on this. I intend to crank out the move to
>>> subversion, integrate patches and cut a test release at some point,
>>> but just don't know when...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>   Dan
>>>
>>> On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
>>>> Hey.
>>>>
>>>> It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
>>>> so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?
>>>>
>>>> It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(
>>>>
>>>> Bjarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGd82yO+Ewtpi9rLERAqsAAKCR9Pv+Y6Vez43Nn5CqXQiLWr8JxQCdEtYX
951Epjdk4sX+zI4XYTFEnSQ=
=ebW1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Bjarke,

I'll do what I can.

Daniel

On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> Hey Daniel.
>
> Any chance of you getting some more time during the summer you think? :)
>
> Bjarke
>
> Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > Hi Bjarke,
> >
> > It would be a shame, yes!
> >
> > All my time is maxed out with work and research right now, so it's
> > difficult to get time in on this. I intend to crank out the move to
> > subversion, integrate patches and cut a test release at some point,
> > but just don't know when...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >   Dan
> >
> > On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> >> Hey.
> >>
> >> It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
> >> so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?
> >>
> >> It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(
> >>
> >> Bjarke
-- 
Daniel J Blueman

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey Daniel.

Any chance of you getting some more time during the summer you think? :)

Bjarke

Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Hi Bjarke,
> 
> It would be a shame, yes!
> 
> All my time is maxed out with work and research right now, so it's
> difficult to get time in on this. I intend to crank out the move to
> subversion, integrate patches and cut a test release at some point,
> but just don't know when...
> 
> Thanks,
>   Dan
> 
> On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hey.
>>
>> It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
>> so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?
>>
>> It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(
>>
>> Bjarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGd8k1O+Ewtpi9rLERArj2AKCfzMmSKNRfLusd8NwwzERHVXAwhwCg2Eih
XZlJLRLvzE6z1UXgf6TRABw=
=B5b4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Bjarke,

It would be a shame, yes!

All my time is maxed out with work and research right now, so it's
difficult to get time in on this. I intend to crank out the move to
subversion, integrate patches and cut a test release at some point,
but just don't know when...

Thanks,
  Dan

On 19/06/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey.
>
> It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
> so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?
>
> It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(
>
> Bjarke
-- 
Daniel J Blueman

[Linux-igd-devel] Status update?

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey.

It seems like several months since anything has happend to this project,
so I was wondering if it was possible to get a status update?

It would be a shame if it's going to die once again :-(

Bjarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGd5r8O+Ewtpi9rLERAnVZAJ9E1wq0clb/4ZLuV5xuG2UakC/++gCeOjT3
pkLS6pyFmIvQcRVL3o16BSQ=
=XaC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Linux-igd-devel] HAVE_LIBIPTC should be removed from the code.

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If you take a look here:
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/FAQ/netfilter-faq-4.html#ss4.5

"Now you might think 'but what about libiptc?'. As has been pointed out
numerous times on the mailinglist(s), libiptc was _NEVER_ meant to be
used as a public interface. We don't guarantee a stable interface, and
it is planned to remove it in the next incarnation of linux packet
filtering. libiptc is way too low-layer to be used reasonably anyway."

So, the code should be removed, since it's never ment to be supported
this way.

btw. Any news on a new release soon? (I know, I'm impatient ;-) )

Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGRN/MO+Ewtpi9rLERAjQiAJ0TIv1tc8/htWv57HfMqz0gq+ErxwCePfS+
RUYAg2tSfPbz5qs3VF8s6g0=
=cODc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Rosfran B. <ro...@gm...>]

Hi Juho, thanks for the response.
In order to get the autotools version of the Linux IGD, it would be easier
to do the following:

   cvs -z3 -d:ext:dev...@li...:/cvsroot/linu=
x-igd
co -r linux-igd_autotools -P linux-igd

The CVS command above will checkout the linux-igd repository, tagged with
the tag "linux-igd_autotools". I created this tag just for the autotools
changes. So, all the linux-igd developers can see the changes...

[]'s
Rosfran Borges

On 4/22/07, Juho V=E4h=E4-Herttua <ju...@ik...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry, the situation with this project is bad. There's people who
> come along and do something but soon they come busy and stop
> contributing. (I'm definitely one of these, I did the iptc stuff and
> rewrote the website to be more compliant but haven't had much time
> since) I found your autotools suggestion from before, is it the
> latest version now? Could you maybe send the latest patch as a diff
> (diff -u -p old new) against the current devel so it would be also
> easier to see the changes. I actually think autotools is a good thing
> (although it's slower than makefile) so it would be good to get it
> committed.
>
>
> Juho
>
>
> On 22.4.2007, at 2.46, Rosfran Borges wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bjarke,
> > I am trying to contact the Linux IGD community, but no response
> > (and it was 5 months ago). I made some autotools scripts (automake/
> > autoconf/configure) to the project, but I had sent the patch, and
> > commited using another tag id. I hope that someone can comment
> > about these changes I sent - there would be good to hear something
> > new about this project.
> >
> > []'s
> > Rosfran Borges
> >
> > On 4/21/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote: -----
> > BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hey.
> >
> > Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> > Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> > emailing him).
> >
> > Bjarke
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFGKpsqO+Ewtpi9rLERAgEDAJ9pW2rE535ytL4TGUmGi/k3AXunsQCg2nbx
> > 7xaRIsFer2jbPQOuVxrcpJ4=3D
> > =3D0bit
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> > Lin...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> > Lin...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>
>
>

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey Daniel.

Okay, that sounds great.
I sent you a patch from my other email, could you take a look at it?

Bjarke

Daniel J Blueman skrev:
> Hi Bjarke,
> 
> I'm really sorry for lack of response. My time has been creaking under
> the additional work in my day-job as well as part-time research in the
> evenings, so it's been really hard to prioritise this in.
> 
> After I catch up with a few things, I plan on moving things on a little.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Dan
> 
> On 22/04/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> Hey.
> 
> Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> emailing him).
> 
> Bjarke
>>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Linux-igd-devel mailing list
Lin...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGK19ZO+Ewtpi9rLERAgGkAKC2pzYsCfgM7sl7p76CGQN1wsdHKQCbB/4a
lmNaKA7vefVzivUBu/7eDu8=
=w8WJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Bjarke,

I'm really sorry for lack of response. My time has been creaking under
the additional work in my day-job as well as part-time research in the
evenings, so it's been really hard to prioritise this in.

After I catch up with a few things, I plan on moving things on a little.

Thanks,
  Dan

On 22/04/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey.
>
> Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> emailing him).
>
> Bjarke
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGKpsqO+Ewtpi9rLERAgEDAJ9pW2rE535ytL4TGUmGi/k3AXunsQCg2nbx
> 7xaRIsFer2jbPQOuVxrcpJ4=
> =0bit
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>


-- 
Daniel J Blueman

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[<ju...@ik...>]

Hi,

I'm sorry, the situation with this project is bad. There's people who  
come along and do something but soon they come busy and stop  
contributing. (I'm definitely one of these, I did the iptc stuff and  
rewrote the website to be more compliant but haven't had much time  
since) I found your autotools suggestion from before, is it the  
latest version now? Could you maybe send the latest patch as a diff  
(diff -u -p old new) against the current devel so it would be also  
easier to see the changes. I actually think autotools is a good thing  
(although it's slower than makefile) so it would be good to get it  
committed.


Juho


On 22.4.2007, at 2.46, Rosfran Borges wrote:
>
> Hi Bjarke,
> I am trying to contact the Linux IGD community, but no response  
> (and it was 5 months ago). I made some autotools scripts (automake/ 
> autoconf/configure) to the project, but I had sent the patch, and  
> commited using another tag id. I hope that someone can comment  
> about these changes I sent - there would be good to hear something  
> new about this project.
>
> []'s
> Rosfran Borges
>
> On 4/21/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote: ----- 
> BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey.
>
> Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> emailing him).
>
> Bjarke
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGKpsqO+Ewtpi9rLERAgEDAJ9pW2rE535ytL4TGUmGi/k3AXunsQCg2nbx
> 7xaRIsFer2jbPQOuVxrcpJ4=
> =0bit
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm not an expert on autoconf/automake/configure scripts, don't really
know anything about them really :-(

Bjarke

Rosfran Borges skrev:
> 
> Hi Bjarke,
> I am trying to contact the Linux IGD community, but no response (and it
> was 5 months ago). I made some autotools scripts
> (automake/autoconf/configure) to the project, but I had sent the patch,
> and commited using another tag id. I hope that someone can comment about
> these changes I sent - there would be good to hear something new about
> this project.
> 
> []'s
> Rosfran Borges
> 
> On 4/21/07, *Bjarke Istrup Pedersen* <gu...@gu...
> <mailto:gu...@gu...>> wrote:
> 
> Hey.
> 
> Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> emailing him).
> 
> Bjarke

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Linux-igd-devel mailing list
Lin...@li...
<mailto:Lin...@li...>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel>



> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGKqc0O+Ewtpi9rLERAlsBAJ0coj73BPtLumWA09+EXPF0GttmGACfTESI
3dlNa5Rdhub9V9Ma6lE0h4M=
=jJoA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Rosfran B. <ro...@gm...>]

Hi Bjarke,
I am trying to contact the Linux IGD community, but no response (and it was
5 months ago). I made some autotools scripts (automake/autoconf/configure)
to the project, but I had sent the patch, and commited using another tag id.
I hope that someone can comment about these changes I sent - there would be
good to hear something new about this project.

[]'s
Rosfran Borges

On 4/21/07, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gu...@gu...> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey.
>
> Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
> Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
> emailing him).
>
> Bjarke
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGKpsqO+Ewtpi9rLERAgEDAJ9pW2rE535ytL4TGUmGi/k3AXunsQCg2nbx
> 7xaRIsFer2jbPQOuVxrcpJ4=
> =0bit
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>

[Linux-igd-devel] Development status

[Bjarke I. P. <gu...@gu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey.

Just wanted to know, has the development stopped?
Not a single commit in quiet a while, and no word from Daniel (tried
emailing him).

Bjarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGKpsqO+Ewtpi9rLERAgEDAJ9pW2rE535ytL4TGUmGi/k3AXunsQCg2nbx
7xaRIsFer2jbPQOuVxrcpJ4=
=0bit
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Linux-igd-devel] 1.0 finally released and new development branch open...

[Rosfran B. <ro...@gm...>]

 Hi,
 I'd made, 2-3 months ago, a new LinuxIGD distro with autotools
(autoconf/automake) stuff. I had sent it to this mailing list, and sent some
e-mails to some of you, but couldn't get any response. If you have any
interest, I can send it again, and so you can send the comments. Thanks!

Regards,
Rosfran

On 2/7/07, Daniel J Blueman <dan...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Now that I made the linuxIGD 1.0 release, there is a couple of tasks
> to do before we open the door to larger changes with the linux-igd
> project:
>
> -> we need to announce this on the project news page
>
> -> need to build and upload some binary packages
>
> I'll see about putting up a news release in the next 24 hours, unless
> anyone would like to? And, I'd appreciate help from anyone else who
> may contribute a binary package.
>
> For the next steps, there is (in addition to the items in the TODO file):
>
> -> configure script/autotooling
>
> -> Layer3Forwarding patch from Nektarios
>
> Nektarios: is the patch in the patches section of the project your
> latest version?
>
> -> AutoNotification patch from Nileshkumar
>
> Nileshkumar: can you check this is your latest one too?
>
> Don't worry about the patches not applying to the current version
> though etc; I'll apply them by hand as needed etc. For any non-trivial
> patches, we should use the 'Signed-off-by: Joe Bloggs
> <joe...@co...>' on the CVS commit messages; so I'll contact the
> right developer in email for one when I'm about to commit a patch.
>
> We need to re-contact the people who had some interest in the autotool
> stuff, distro-specific scripts and who were talking about the name
> changes (linux-idg -> upnpd to reflect multi-OS compatibility) etc to
> contribute and start the ball rolling again. It would be good to get
> this stuff in.
>
> After these initial patches, I'll cut a 1.5-rc1 release (I think we
> can justify the jump to 1.5). If we have the project and script name
> changes to upnpd (etc), then we can cut a 2.0-rc1 release. After some
> months of testing and -rc releases, we can release the final 1.5/2.0
> release.
>
> Please post ideas, comments and suggestions!
>   - Dan
> --
> Daniel J Blueman
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier.
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-igd-devel mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-igd-devel
>

[Linux-igd-devel] 1.0 finally released and new development branch open...

[Daniel J B. <dan...@gm...>]

Now that I made the linuxIGD 1.0 release, there is a couple of tasks
to do before we open the door to larger changes with the linux-igd
project:

 -> we need to announce this on the project news page

 -> need to build and upload some binary packages

I'll see about putting up a news release in the next 24 hours, unless
anyone would like to? And, I'd appreciate help from anyone else who
may contribute a binary package.

For the next steps, there is (in addition to the items in the TODO file):

 -> configure script/autotooling

 -> Layer3Forwarding patch from Nektarios

Nektarios: is the patch in the patches section of the project your
latest version?

 -> AutoNotification patch from Nileshkumar

Nileshkumar: can you check this is your latest one too?

Don't worry about the patches not applying to the current version
though etc; I'll apply them by hand as needed etc. For any non-trivial
patches, we should use the 'Signed-off-by: Joe Bloggs
<joe...@co...>' on the CVS commit messages; so I'll contact the
right developer in email for one when I'm about to commit a patch.

We need to re-contact the people who had some interest in the autotool
stuff, distro-specific scripts and who were talking about the name
changes (linux-idg -> upnpd to reflect multi-OS compatibility) etc to
contribute and start the ball rolling again. It would be good to get
this stuff in.

After these initial patches, I'll cut a 1.5-rc1 release (I think we
can justify the jump to 1.5). If we have the project and script name
changes to upnpd (etc), then we can cut a 2.0-rc1 release. After some
months of testing and -rc releases, we can release the final 1.5/2.0
release.

Please post ideas, comments and suggestions!
  - Dan
-- 
Daniel J Blueman