You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(25) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(18) |
2004 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(30) |
2005 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(20) |
2006 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(15) |
2007 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(9) |
2008 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(10) |
2010 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(9) |
2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(10) |
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(7) |
2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(10) |
2019 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(5) |
2020 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(4) |
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2022 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(4) |
2023 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-05-01 21:29:25
|
Hello, I now have the NI AT-GPIB-TNT software compiled. Everything seems to be OK until I run ibtest. The response is "trying to open pad 0..." But the computer is totally hung. Have to push reset. As before, this configuration works under Win98. I've included some supporting files below. By the way, I've upgraded to 3.1.3. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks, Tim gpib.conf interface { minor = 0 board_type = atgpib pad = 0 sad = 0 timeout = 3s eos = 0x0a set-reos yes set-bin no base = 0x2C0 irq = 15 dma = 7 master yes } device { name = bk minor = 0 pad = 26 sad = 0 } [root@speedy root]# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted soundcore 4100 0 (autoclean) tnt4882 5060 0 (unused) nec7210 8096 0 [tnt4882] gpib-common 13536 0 [tnt4882] autofs 10244 0 (autoclean) (unused) 3c59x 26216 1 ext3 62048 6 jbd 40376 6 [ext3] aic7xxx 116256 7 sd_mod 11552 14 scsi_mod 96524 2 [aic7xxx sd_mod] [root@speedy root]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 24213 XT-PIC timer 1: 795 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 10: 7695 XT-PIC aic7xxx, eth0 12: 1334 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse NMI: 0 ERR: 0 [root@speedy root]# cat /proc/ioports 0000-001f : dma1 0020-003f : pic1 0040-005f : timer 0060-006f : keyboard 0070-007f : rtc 0080-008f : dma page reg 00a0-00bf : pic2 00c0-00df : dma2 00f0-00ff : fpu 02f8-02ff : serial(auto) 03c0-03df : vga+ 03f8-03ff : serial(auto) 0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1 fc00-fcff : Adaptec AIC-7881U ff00-ff3f : 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX [Boomerang] ff00-ff3f : 00:0f.0 ffa0-ffaf : Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] dmesg: Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.18-0.13custom gpib: registered atgpib interface gpib: registered ni_pci interface Available NI device IDs: ------------------------------------------------ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-30 21:19:58
|
Oops, the driver expects the board_type to be 'atgpib' instead of 'ni_isa'. It's changed to 'ni_isa' in CVS now, or you can just change your gpib.conf to use 'atgpib'. Although, 3.1.2 does have a potentially nasty race bug which might cause problems during reads, depending on how fast your device's gpib chip operates. Frank On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, wrote: > Hello, > > I have done a fresh install of RedHat 7.3 Beta with kernel 2.4.18. I > also installed Win98. Under Win98, the NI AT-GPIB board installed OK > at IRQ 5, DMA 7, and IO 0x2C0. I was able to communicate with the > board and instrument using the NI Windows software. > > I was able to get linux-gpib-3.1.2 to compile and the modules to > install, but cannot communicate. > > gpib.conf: > > /*******************/ > interface { > minor = 0 > board_type = ni_isa > pad = 0 > sad = 0 > timeout = 10s > > eos = 0x0a > set-reos yes > set-bin no > > base = 0x2C0 > irq = 5 > dma = 7 > > master yes > } > /*********************/ > > /* now the device section defines the device characteristics for each device. > */ > > > device { > name = bk > minor = 0 > pad = 26 > sad = 0 > } > > > dmesg: > > Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.18-0.13custom > gpib: registered atgpib interface > gpib: registered ni_pci interface > Available NI device IDs: > > lsmod: > > [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# lsmod > Module Size Used by Not tainted > nls_iso8859-1 2816 0 (autoclean) > sr_mod 15192 0 (autoclean) > cdrom 27872 0 (autoclean) [sr_mod] > soundcore 4100 0 (autoclean) > tnt4882 5060 0 (unused) > nec7210 8064 0 [tnt4882] > gpib-common 13504 0 [tnt4882] > autofs 10244 0 (autoclean) (unused) > 3c59x 26216 1 > usb-uhci 21636 0 (unused) > usbcore 59072 1 [usb-uhci] > ext3 62048 6 > jbd 40376 6 [ext3] > aic7xxx 116256 7 > sd_mod 11552 14 > scsi_mod 96524 3 [sr_mod aic7xxx sd_mod] > > > > ibtest: > > [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# examples/ibtest > enter primary address for device [0-30]: 0 > trying to open pad = 0 on /dev/gpib0 ... > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > failed to get descriptor > > > [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# examples/ibtest > enter primary address for device [0-30]: 26 > trying to open pad = 26 on /dev/gpib0 ... > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR > -- errno=19 (No such device) > failed to get descriptor > > > /var/log/messages when ibtest is run: > > Apr 30 10:58:28 speedy kernel: gpib: no gpib board configured on /dev/gpib0 > > > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > |
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-04-30 20:52:41
|
Hello, I have done a fresh install of RedHat 7.3 Beta with kernel 2.4.18. I also installed Win98. Under Win98, the NI AT-GPIB board installed OK at IRQ 5, DMA 7, and IO 0x2C0. I was able to communicate with the board and instrument using the NI Windows software. I was able to get linux-gpib-3.1.2 to compile and the modules to install, but cannot communicate. gpib.conf: /*******************/ interface { minor = 0 board_type = ni_isa pad = 0 sad = 0 timeout = 10s eos = 0x0a set-reos yes set-bin no base = 0x2C0 irq = 5 dma = 7 master yes } /*********************/ /* now the device section defines the device characteristics for each device. */ device { name = bk minor = 0 pad = 26 sad = 0 } dmesg: Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.18-0.13custom gpib: registered atgpib interface gpib: registered ni_pci interface Available NI device IDs: lsmod: [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted nls_iso8859-1 2816 0 (autoclean) sr_mod 15192 0 (autoclean) cdrom 27872 0 (autoclean) [sr_mod] soundcore 4100 0 (autoclean) tnt4882 5060 0 (unused) nec7210 8064 0 [tnt4882] gpib-common 13504 0 [tnt4882] autofs 10244 0 (autoclean) (unused) 3c59x 26216 1 usb-uhci 21636 0 (unused) usbcore 59072 1 [usb-uhci] ext3 62048 6 jbd 40376 6 [ext3] aic7xxx 116256 7 sd_mod 11552 14 scsi_mod 96524 3 [sr_mod aic7xxx sd_mod] ibtest: [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# examples/ibtest enter primary address for device [0-30]: 0 trying to open pad = 0 on /dev/gpib0 ... ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:53:34 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) failed to get descriptor [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# examples/ibtest enter primary address for device [0-30]: 26 trying to open pad = 26 on /dev/gpib0 ... ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 17:54:09 2002](-) EDVR -- errno=19 (No such device) failed to get descriptor /var/log/messages when ibtest is run: Apr 30 10:58:28 speedy kernel: gpib: no gpib board configured on /dev/gpib0 Any ideas? Thanks, Tim ------------------------------------------------ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-30 20:19:52
|
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Joan Valduvieco wrote: > Running ibtest: > > master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3/examples# ./ibtest > enter primary address for device [0-30]: 7 > trying to open pad = 7 on /dev/gpib0 ... > gpib: ioports are already in useGPIB Hardware Error! (Chip type not found or > wrong Base Address?) > > ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 15:15:12 2002](-)< ERR> EDVR <OS Error> > -- errno=1 (Operation not permitted) > failed to bring device online > failed to get descriptor > There was a stray semicolon after the if statement that checked if the allocation of the ioports was successful. It's fixed in CVS now. You'll need to reboot to free up the ioports that the old driver left allocated. Thanks for the bug report, let me know how it goes. Frank |
From: Joan V. <jo...@la...> - 2002-04-30 17:59:19
|
Hi, No other process using gpib. The board is an original NI pcII. It is configured in pcII mode using 7210 mode. Base address is configured to be 0x2b8 interrupt line 3 and dma 1. Some information that might be interesting: /proc/ioports before loading module pc2-gpib.o: 0000-001f : dma1 0020-003f : pic1 0040-005f : timer 0060-006f : keyboard 0070-007f : rtc 0080-008f : dma page reg 00a0-00bf : pic2 00c0-00df : dma2 00f0-00ff : fpu 01f0-01f7 : ide0 03c0-03df : vga+ 03f6-03f6 : ide0 03f8-03ff : serial(set) 0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1 d000-d07f : VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine 10/100] d000-d07f : via-rhine d400-d41f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 USB d800-d80f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 IDE d800-d807 : ide0 d808-d80f : ide1 e400-e43f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI e800-e81f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI /proc/interrupts: CPU0 0: 76844 XT-PIC timer 1: 1994 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 3 XT-PIC rtc 10: 9835 XT-PIC eth0 12: 4697 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse 14: 1461 XT-PIC ide0 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 Loading the module I get: master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3# modprobe pc2-gpib Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.18 gpib: registered pcII interface gpib: registered pcIIa interface ioports and interrupts remain the same. On /var/log/syslog I see: Apr 30 17:03:40 master kernel: Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.18 Apr 30 17:03:40 master kernel: gpib: registered pcII interface Apr 30 17:03:40 master kernel: gpib: registered pcIIa interface Running ibtest: master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3/examples# ./ibtest enter primary address for device [0-30]: 7 trying to open pad = 7 on /dev/gpib0 ... gpib: ioports are already in useGPIB Hardware Error! (Chip type not found or wrong Base Address?) ibBoardFunc :[Tue Apr 30 15:15:12 2002](-)< ERR> EDVR <OS Error> -- errno=1 (Operation not permitted) failed to bring device online failed to get descriptor /proc/interrupts and /proc/ioports: master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3/examples# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 91948 XT-PIC timer 1: 2969 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 3 XT-PIC rtc 10: 11017 XT-PIC eth0 12: 6263 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse 14: 1547 XT-PIC ide0 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3/examples# cat /proc/ioports 0000-001f : dma1 0020-003f : pic1 0040-005f : timer 0060-006f : keyboard 0070-007f : rtc 0080-008f : dma page reg 00a0-00bf : pic2 00c0-00df : dma2 00f0-00ff : fpu 01f0-01f7 : ide0 02b8-02bf : pc2 <---------------- 03c0-03df : vga+ 03f6-03f6 : ide0 03f8-03ff : serial(set) 0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1 d000-d07f : VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine 10/100] d000-d07f : via-rhine d400-d41f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 USB d800-d80f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 IDE d800-d807 : ide0 d808-d80f : ide1 e400-e43f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI e800-e81f : Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI As you can see iobase isn't freed. lsof says that nobody is accessing /dev/gpib* More info: Major and minors.. master:~/src/linux-gpib-3.1.3/examples# ls -l /dev/gpib* crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 0 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib0 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 1 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib1 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 10 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib10 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 11 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib11 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 12 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib12 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 13 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib13 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 14 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib14 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 15 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib15 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 2 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib2 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 3 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib3 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 4 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib4 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 5 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib5 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 6 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib6 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 7 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib7 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 8 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib8 crw-rw---- 1 root gpib 160, 9 Apr 25 18:59 /dev/gpib9 /etc/gpib.conf: interface { minor = 0 board_type = pcII pad = 0 sad = 0 timeout = 3s eos = 0x0a set-reos yes set-bin no base = 0x02b8 irq = 3 dma = 1 master yes } Hope this helps. Have I missed something? Thanks for your time. Joan A Divendres 26 Abril 2002 20:24, vàreu escriure: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Joan Valduvieco wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been trying to configure NI PCII in PCII mode with > > linux-gpib-3.1.3.I'm "sure" that base address, IRQ and DMA are well > > configured, module is loaded but I can't comunicate with GPIB bus. > > I always get a resurce busy when runing: #./ibtest > > Do you have any other processes running that are using the gpib board? > Could you send a copy of the program's output when it fails, and any > relevent messages in 'dmesg'? > > Frank |
From: Joan V. <jo...@la...> - 2002-04-26 19:58:47
|
Ok, On monday I'll send it. If anyone has this card working please let me know as it would be my fault. No, I haven't any other proces using it. Joan A Divendres 26 Abril 2002 20:24, vàreu escriure: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Joan Valduvieco wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been trying to configure NI PCII in PCII mode with > > linux-gpib-3.1.3.I'm "sure" that base address, IRQ and DMA are well > > configured, module is loaded but I can't comunicate with GPIB bus. > > I always get a resurce busy when runing: #./ibtest > > Do you have any other processes running that are using the gpib board? > Could you send a copy of the program's output when it fails, and any > relevent messages in 'dmesg'? > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-26 18:24:18
|
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Joan Valduvieco wrote: > Hi, > I've been trying to configure NI PCII in PCII mode with linux-gpib-3.1.3.I'm > "sure" that base address, IRQ and DMA are well configured, module is loaded > but I can't comunicate with GPIB bus. > I always get a resurce busy when runing: #./ibtest Do you have any other processes running that are using the gpib board? Could you send a copy of the program's output when it fails, and any relevent messages in 'dmesg'? Frank |
From: Joan V. <jo...@la...> - 2002-04-26 17:48:00
|
Hi, I've been trying to configure NI PCII in PCII mode with linux-gpib-3.1.3.I'm "sure" that base address, IRQ and DMA are well configured, module is loaded but I can't comunicate with GPIB bus. I always get a resurce busy when runing: #./ibtest If I cat /proc/ioports I see that pc2 has reserved my base port. Sometimes when looking /proc/ioports I get a segmentation fault and must reboot. Any suggest? succes history, tip? Has anyone a NI PCII working with linux-gpib-3.1.3 or .1.2? Thanks for your time, Joan |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-18 17:16:08
|
linux-gpib-3.1.3 is available for download. Changes: Fixed race in nec7210 read that could cause failure to receive last byte on reads. Board-specific fixes for ines pci, ines pcmcia, and cec/keithley pci support. Frank |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-18 15:47:58
|
It should work as a pcII (not a pcIIa) board. Frank On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Stephen Broccardo wrote: > Hello > > I have an old ISA PC488 board from CEC. Since it is > based on the NEC7210 chip, would I be correct in > assuming that it will behave like an NEC PCII(a) card? > Or would the PCI CEC driver work? Or am I outta luck? > > Thanks > > Steve > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > |
From: Stephen B. <sbr...@ya...> - 2002-04-18 13:22:35
|
Hello I have an old ISA PC488 board from CEC. Since it is based on the NEC7210 chip, would I be correct in assuming that it will behave like an NEC PCII(a) card? Or would the PCI CEC driver work? Or am I outta luck? Thanks Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-17 16:17:48
|
You should be able to manually conduct serial polls using the ibrsp() function. All the 'autopolling' support is broken at the moment though. Frank On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Sridhar Anandakrishnan wrote: > Hi all on the linux-gpib list - I wonder if you can answer this > question... > > When I want to download a waveform from the oscilloscope, is there a way > for the user-level program to be informed when the acquisition is done? > The scope will take 500ms to finish, and is there an interrupt that is > generated by the linux-gpib code when the oscilloscope sets the Operation > Complete bit in the status register? Or is there a way to poll > periodically from the user level? > > I want to ask the scope to average 500 triggers (1ms apart), and then I > want to download those data. If I simply send the "acquire" command and > then immediately request the data "curve?", the 500 averages won't be over > - what will happen? Does the software hold the request until the scope is > done? Or is the command sent out right away (in which case I think the > scope responds with the 'incomplete' data - not enough averages...) > > I apologize if this question isn't very clear... > > Thanks, > Sridhar. > > Sridhar Anandakrishnan email: sa...@es... > 442 Deike Bldg Phone: (814) 863-6742 > Pennsylvania State University Dept: 863-6052 > University Park, PA 16802-2711 Fax: 863-8724 > > |
From: Sridhar A. <sa...@ge...> - 2002-04-16 22:00:07
|
Hi all on the linux-gpib list - I wonder if you can answer this question... When I want to download a waveform from the oscilloscope, is there a way for the user-level program to be informed when the acquisition is done? The scope will take 500ms to finish, and is there an interrupt that is generated by the linux-gpib code when the oscilloscope sets the Operation Complete bit in the status register? Or is there a way to poll periodically from the user level? I want to ask the scope to average 500 triggers (1ms apart), and then I want to download those data. If I simply send the "acquire" command and then immediately request the data "curve?", the 500 averages won't be over - what will happen? Does the software hold the request until the scope is done? Or is the command sent out right away (in which case I think the scope responds with the 'incomplete' data - not enough averages...) I apologize if this question isn't very clear... Thanks, Sridhar. Sridhar Anandakrishnan email: sa...@es... 442 Deike Bldg Phone: (814) 863-6742 Pennsylvania State University Dept: 863-6052 University Park, PA 16802-2711 Fax: 863-8724 |
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-04-10 21:12:38
|
Hello, I posted a bit ago about "unresolved symbols". I have not been able to get depmod -e to report and problems, but I insmod reported this: [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# insmod /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_R82739b6c Does this mean anything? Thanks again, Tim ------------------------------------------------ |
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-04-05 22:03:52
|
OK, now I'm really confused. Running "depmod -e" returns nothing! But the install script line I quoted claims to find unresolved symbol. Maybe I'm doing something really ignorant here... Tim --- On Fri 04/05, frank mori hess wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Here is the output from depmod -e : > > > > > > [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# depmod -e > 2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o > > # module id=string > > # pci module vendor device subvendor subdevice > class class_mask driver_data > > # isapnp module cardvendor carddevice driver_data vendor > function ... > > # usb module match_flags idVendor idProduct bcdDevice_lo > bcdDevice_hi bDeviceClass bDeviceSubClass bDeviceProtocol bInterfaceClass > bInterfaceSubClass bInterfaceProtocol driver_info > > # module pattern > > > > We're not getting any unresolved symbols here. You want to run 'depmod > -e' with no arguments. > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > ------------------------------------------------ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-05 19:12:51
|
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the output from depmod -e : > > > [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# depmod -e 2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o > # module id=string > # pci module vendor device subvendor subdevice class class_mask driver_data > # isapnp module cardvendor carddevice driver_data vendor function ... > # usb module match_flags idVendor idProduct bcdDevice_lo bcdDevice_hi bDeviceClass bDeviceSubClass bDeviceProtocol bInterfaceClass bInterfaceSubClass bInterfaceProtocol driver_info > # module pattern > We're not getting any unresolved symbols here. You want to run 'depmod -e' with no arguments. Frank |
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-04-05 17:55:57
|
Hello, Here is the output from depmod -e : [root@speedy linux-gpib-3.1.2]# depmod -e 2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o # module id=string # pci module vendor device subvendor subdevice class class_mask driver_data # isapnp module cardvendor carddevice driver_data vendor function ... # usb module match_flags idVendor idProduct bcdDevice_lo bcdDevice_hi bDeviceClass bDeviceSubClass bDeviceProtocol bInterfaceClass bInterfaceSubClass bInterfaceProtocol driver_info # module pattern Thanks, Tim --- On Thu 04/04, frank mori hess wrote: > > What is the ouput of 'depmod -e'? > > Frank > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I have compiled linux-gpib-3.1.2 with no errors. However, when I do > "make install", I get the following message: > > > > depmod -a 2.4.7-10custom > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o > > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/nec7210.o > > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/tms9914.o > > > > I am running RedHat 7.2. Any ideas what might be happening here? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Tim Holmes > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > > Lin...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > > > > ------------------------------------------------ |
From: Marc L. <Mar...@un...> - 2002-04-05 16:31:01
|
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:43:59 -0600 (CST),=20 frank mori hess <fm...@st...> wrote : Dear Frank, thanks a lot for your quick answer and help. > Marc, >=20 > There are at least 3 different pci codes for ines pci boards, try looki= ng > through the driver provided by ines. There are a few source code files= , > and I remember the pci ids are listed in one of them (driver/ie_pci.c i= n > the ines package), also I remember the different boards used different You're right. In fact, I tried first their linux-2.2 driver, which had no source code with it. Indeed, the lab machine was running a 2.2 kernel. I then found about linux-gpib, and moved the board to a 2.4 machine for testing since there was apparently no 2.2 driver available. Thus, I did not look at the ines 2.4 driver because I thought there absolutely no source code of the driver available. It looks like there is now only ieksys.o whose source code is not available. > base address indexes for their gpib chip. There will probably also be > some interrupt-related issues depending on what kind of pci chip the bo= ard > you have is using (amcc5920 apparently). OK. I will have a look at their source code and try their 2.4 driver. After a quick look, they seem to do the pci_find_device with the same values as me so that call shoulsd succeed but you are right that they seem to different things with different boards. I guess I need to have a closer look at that. > By the way, the id numbers are given in hex, maybe you entered them > as decimal? I have fallen too often into that trap not to immune now :-) /* #define INES_VENDOR_ID 0x10b5 */ /* #define INES_DEV_ID 0x9050 */ /* #define INES_SUBID 0x107210b5L */ #define INES_VENDOR_ID 0x10e8 #define INES_DEV_ID 0x8259 >=20 > Frank By the way, I have got in touch with INES support this week. Their linux developer is on vacation this week, but should come back to me next week. Do you want me to suggest them that they should help you more ? Marc --=20 _____________________________________________________________ Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules Bat P5, UFR de Physique Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) e-mail: Mar...@un... Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 _____________________________________________________________ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-05 15:44:09
|
Marc, There are at least 3 different pci codes for ines pci boards, try looking through the driver provided by ines. There are a few source code files, and I remember the pci ids are listed in one of them (driver/ie_pci.c in the ines package), also I remember the different boards used different base address indexes for their gpib chip. There will probably also be some interrupt-related issues depending on what kind of pci chip the board you have is using (amcc5920 apparently). By the way, the id numbers are given in hex, maybe you entered them as decimal? Frank On 5 Apr 2002, Marc Lefranc wrote: > On 05 Apr 2002 16:59:08 +0200, > Marc Lefranc <Mar...@un...> wrote : > > Looking in driver/ines/ines_init.c, I see that the init code looks for > > a board that has vendor_id and device_id INES_VENDOR_ID and > > INES_DEV_ID, but my Ines board does not advertise itself as such : > > > > /sbin/lspci -vv : > > > > 00:0b.0 PIC: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 8507 (p= rog-if 00 [8259]) > [...] > > I will try to replace the INES_VENDOR_ID and INES_DEV_ID with the > > values obtained with lspci and see what happens. > > Well, this didn't help : I still get the same error message... > > I am quite surprised that pci_find_device does not find the vendor and > device id listed by lspci ?? > > Marc > > If that helps, here is the output ls lspci -vvx : > > 00:0b.0 PIC: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 8507 (pro= g-if 00 [8259]) > =09Subsystem: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 1072 > =09Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- St= epping- SERR- FastB2B- > =09Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=3Dmedium >TAbort- <TA= bort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- > =09Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 5 > =09Region 0: I/O ports at e400 [size=3D128] > =09Region 1: I/O ports at e800 [size=3D32] > 00: e8 10 07 85 03 00 80 02 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 > 10: 01 e4 00 00 01 e8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e8 10 72 10 > 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 01 00 00 > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________ > Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS > Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules > Bat P5, UFR de Physique > Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille > F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) > e-mail: Mar...@un... > Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 > _____________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > |
From: Marc L. <Mar...@un...> - 2002-04-05 15:28:11
|
On 05 Apr 2002 16:59:08 +0200,=20 Marc Lefranc <Mar...@un...> wrote : > Looking in driver/ines/ines_init.c, I see that the init code looks for > a board that has vendor_id and device_id INES_VENDOR_ID and > INES_DEV_ID, but my Ines board does not advertise itself as such : >=20 > /sbin/lspci -vv : >=20 > 00:0b.0 PIC: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 8507 (p= rog-if 00 [8259]) [...] > I will try to replace the INES_VENDOR_ID and INES_DEV_ID with the > values obtained with lspci and see what happens. Well, this didn't help : I still get the same error message... I am quite surprised that pci_find_device does not find the vendor and device id listed by lspci ?? Marc If that helps, here is the output ls lspci -vvx : 00:0b.0 PIC: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 8507 (pro= g-if 00 [8259]) Subsystem: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 1072 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Step= ping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=3Dmedium >TAbort- <TAbo= rt- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 5 Region 0: I/O ports at e400 [size=3D128] Region 1: I/O ports at e800 [size=3D32] 00: e8 10 07 85 03 00 80 02 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 10: 01 e4 00 00 01 e8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e8 10 72 10 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 01 00 00 --=20 _____________________________________________________________ Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules Bat P5, UFR de Physique Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) e-mail: Mar...@un... Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 _____________________________________________________________ |
From: Marc L. <Mar...@un...> - 2002-04-05 14:59:44
|
On 05 Apr 2002 14:09:00 +0200,=20 Marc Lefranc <Mar...@un...> wrote : > However, I have some problems just compiling the stuff. I have began > fixing some things, but I would like to have some feedback. OK. I have downloaded linux-2.4.19-pre6 and compiled it, and then made another attempt at compiling and installing linux-gpib-3.1.2. This time everything went perfectly smoothly. Really strange. I guess subtle things have changed since 2.4.9. Anyway, the driver now loads but it can't find the INES board. This is the message I get when I try to run the ibtest program : Apr 5 16:25:21 cusp kernel: Linux-GPIB Driver -- Kernel Release 2.4.19-p= re6 Apr 5 16:25:21 cusp kernel: gpib: registered ines_pci interface Apr 5 16:25:50 cusp kernel: gpib: no ines PCI board found Apr 5 16:25:50 cusp kernel: GPIB Hardware Error! (Chip type not found or= wrong Base Address?) Looking in driver/ines/ines_init.c, I see that the init code looks for a board that has vendor_id and device_id INES_VENDOR_ID and INES_DEV_ID, but my Ines board does not advertise itself as such : /sbin/lspci -vv : 00:0b.0 PIC: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 8507 (pro= g-if 00 [8259]) Subsystem: Applied Micro Circuits Corporation: Unknown device 1072 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Step= ping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=3Dmedium >TAbort- <TAbo= rt- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 5 Region 0: I/O ports at e400 [size=3D128] Region 1: I/O ports at e800 [size=3D32] I will try to replace the INES_VENDOR_ID and INES_DEV_ID with the values obtained with lspci and see what happens. All the best, Marc --=20 _____________________________________________________________ Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules Bat P5, UFR de Physique Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) e-mail: Mar...@un... Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 _____________________________________________________________ |
From: Marc L. <Mar...@un...> - 2002-04-05 12:17:28
|
On 05 Apr 2002 14:09:00 +0200,=20 Marc Lefranc <Mar...@un...> wrote : >=20 > P.S. If that can help, here his the output of=20 >=20 > nm /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/gpib-common.o : Oops. Since I sent the message, I found the April section of the archive (for whatever reason, I had only came across the March one without noticing that this was only March), and saw the request about depmod -e. Here is the result. This looks quite strange if you ask me. jiffies is not resolved? 748 # depmod -e depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/gpib-common.= o depmod: __wake_up depmod: __generic_copy_from_user depmod: unregister_chrdev depmod: register_chrdev depmod: vfree depmod: boot_cpu_data depmod: interruptible_sleep_on_timeout depmod: del_timer depmod: tvec_bases depmod: jiffies depmod: __vmalloc depmod: printk depmod: add_timer depmod: __const_udelay depmod: __generic_copy_to_user depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/ines-gpib.o depmod: kmalloc depmod: pci_enable_device depmod: free_irq depmod: write_byte depmod: pci_release_regions depmod: kfree depmod: request_irq depmod: pci_find_device depmod: printk depmod: pci_request_regions depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/nec7210.o depmod: __wake_up depmod: schedule depmod: remove_wait_queue depmod: interruptible_sleep_on_timeout depmod: write_byte depmod: read_byte depmod: add_wait_queue depmod: printk depmod: __const_udelay depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/tms9914.o depmod: __wake_up depmod: schedule depmod: remove_wait_queue depmod: interruptible_sleep_on_timeout depmod: write_byte depmod: read_byte depmod: add_wait_queue depmod: printk depmod: __const_udelay --=20 _____________________________________________________________ Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules Bat P5, UFR de Physique Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) e-mail: Mar...@un... Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 _____________________________________________________________ |
From: Marc L. <Mar...@un...> - 2002-04-05 12:09:12
|
Hi, I have been very happy to discover this week the existence of linux-gpib.sourceforge.net. A long time ago, I had had a look at linux-gpib (I have been using linux since 1995) but unfortunately none of the GP-IB boards we had at that time were supported. Recently, we have purchased GPIB-PCI card by Ines as they advertised it to be supported under linux. Admittedly, they provide kernel modules for linux 2.2 and 2.4, and one or two sample programs, but without the source, and no high-level library. Therefore, I was very happy to find out that (1) linux-gpib had been resurrected and (2) that it supported Ines boards. I am thus currently evaluating it.=20 However, I have some problems just compiling the stuff. I have began fixing some things, but I would like to have some feedback. This on a Pentium II machine running Red Hat Linux 7.2 (will all updates applied). I usually compile my kernels, but I have found the 2.4 series a bit unresponsive, and none of the kernels I tried (up to 2.4.19-pre5) has been able to equal the performance of the Red Hat kernels, contrary to what I was accustomed to. Thus, I would like to stick to the latest kernel update (2.4.9-31) to keep the platform stable once everything is in order. What I have done :=20 1) rpm -i kernel-source.XXXX.rpm (unpacks in /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31),=20 cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31 modify Makefile so that EXTRAVERSION is -31 cp configs/kernel-2.4.9-i586.config/ .config make oldconfig make dep 2) go to the freshly untarred linux-gpib-3.1.2 directory; make [I indicate /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31 as the kernel source directory, and select the Ines driver only]=20 compilation begins, with lots of error messages such as=20 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/lefranc/MANIP/gpib/linux-gpib-3.1.2/dr= iver/nec7210' gcc -I. -I../include -I../../include -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c -o cmd.o cmd.c In file included from /usr/include/linux/module.h:21, from board.h:25, from cmd.c:19: /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use ker= nel-headers system headers, /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but rather headers from an a= ppropriate kernel-source package. /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:3:2: #error Change -I/usr/src/linux/incl= ude (or similar) to /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:4:2: #error -I/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/b= uild/include /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:5:2: #error to build against the current= ly-running kernel. OK. I have a look at the Makefiles in driver/* and notice that only driver/protocol/Makefile has INCLUDES =3D -I. -I../include -I../../include -I$(LINUXDIR)/include , while all the others have INCLUDES =3D -I. -I../include -I../../include Thus, I add the -I$(LINUXDIR)/include to Makefiles in driver/{nec7210,tms9914,sys But then I get errors such as=20 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/lefranc/MANIP/gpib/linux-gpib-3.1.2/dr= iver/nec7210' gcc -I. -I../include -I../../include -I"/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31"/include = -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c -o cmd.o cmd.c In file included from ../include/gpib_types.h:22, from ../include/gpibP.h:9, from board.h:23, from cmd.c:19: /usr/include/stdint.h:37: warning: redefinition of `int8_t' /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31/include/linux/types.h:98: warning: `int8_t' previ= ously declared here /usr/include/stdint.h:38: warning: redefinition of `int16_t' /usr/src/linux-2.4.9-31/include/linux/types.h:100: warning: `int16_t' pre= viously declared here The problem here is a conflict between standard include files and those of the kernel. SInce I have done a bit of kernel programming in the past (writing a driver for an DAQ board), this rings a bell, and I wonder about the absence of a -D__KERNEL__ in the CFLAGS for compiling bits of amodule. SInce all driver/*/Makefile have a line CFLAGS +=3D $(INCLUDES) $(OPTIONS) -DEXPORT_SYMTAB I add the following line in driver/Makefile OPTIONS =3D -D__KERNEL__ (actually, I had to manually add a -D__KERNEL__ to the CFLAGS line of driver/sys/Makefile) With these modifications, the whole stuff seems to compile fine.=20 For installation, I had the problem that MODLIB was not defined for whatever reason so that I had to do make MODLIB=3D/lib/modules/2.4.9-31 install I then get : [...] install -D ines-gpib.o /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/ines-gpib.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/lefranc/MANIP/gpib/linux-gpib-3.1.2/dri= ver/ines' depmod -a=20 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/gpib-common.= o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/ines-gpib.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/nec7210.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/tms9914.o make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lefranc/MANIP/gpib/linux-gpib-3.1.2/dri= ver' make: *** [install] Error 2 Is 2.4.9 too old ?=20 Thank you very much in advance. Marc P.S. If that can help, here his the output of=20 nm /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/misc/gpib-common.o : 00002368 T AP_Init 000023d0 T AP_LocalLock 000023f4 T AP_LocalUnLock 00002338 T AP_Lock 00002350 T AP_UnLock 000003e0 C AP_Vector 00000170 D AP_virgin 0000015c D AutoP_mutex 00000030 r DRIVERBITS 000001b0 r DRIVERBITS 000004b0 r DRIVERBITS 00000570 r DRIVERBITS 00000630 r DRIVERBITS 00000690 r DRIVERBITS 00000790 r DRIVERBITS 000007f0 r DRIVERBITS 00000910 r DRIVERBITS 00000990 r DRIVERBITS 000009f0 r DRIVERBITS 00000a50 r DRIVERBITS 00000ad0 r DRIVERBITS 00000b50 r DRIVERBITS 00000bd0 r DRIVERBITS 00000cb0 r DRIVERBITS 00000d50 r DRIVERBITS 00000db0 r DRIVERBITS 00000e70 r DRIVERBITS U __const_udelay 0000110c t __constant_c_memset 00001010 t __constant_copy_from_user 00000f24 t __constant_copy_to_user U __down_failed U __down_failed_interruptible U __generic_copy_from_user U __generic_copy_to_user 00000000 ? __kstrtab_gpib_register_driver 00000040 ? __kstrtab_gpib_unregister_driver 00000000 ? __ksymtab_gpib_register_driver 00000008 ? __ksymtab_gpib_unregister_driver 000014e8 t __list_add 00001500 t __list_del U __up_wakeup U __vmalloc U __wake_up U add_timer 00000680 C board_array 00000900 T board_type_ioctl U boot_cpu_data 00001400 T cleanup_module 00001624 t clear_bit 00001ba4 t clear_bit 0000211c t clear_bit 00000b04 T command_ioctl 00001a2c t constant_test_bit 00001d40 t constant_test_bit U del_timer 000027a8 t down 00000e84 t down_interruptible 000027b8 t down_interruptible 00000158 D drvstat 0000212c T dvrsp 00000020 D ffmt 00000000 t gcc2_compiled. 00001148 t gcc2_compiled. 00001538 t gcc2_compiled. 0000164c t gcc2_compiled. 0000167c t gcc2_compiled. 000016d4 t gcc2_compiled. 00001804 t gcc2_compiled. 00001858 t gcc2_compiled. 00001a50 t gcc2_compiled. 00001a9c t gcc2_compiled. 00001bb4 t gcc2_compiled. 00001c54 t gcc2_compiled. 00001cb4 t gcc2_compiled. 00001d64 t gcc2_compiled. 00001da0 t gcc2_compiled. 00001f50 t gcc2_compiled. 0000200c t gcc2_compiled. 0000212c t gcc2_compiled. 00002338 t gcc2_compiled. 00000eb4 t get_current 0000115c T gpib_register_driver 00001190 T gpib_unregister_driver 0000271c T ibAPE 00002418 T ibAPWait 00002660 T ibAPrsp 00000004 D ib_exclusive 000000a0 D ib_fops 00000000 D ib_opened 0000167c T ibcac 00000078 T ibclose 000016d4 T ibcmd 00001e98 T ibeos 00001804 T ibgts 00000124 T ibioctl 00001a50 T iblines 00001858 T ibonl 00000000 T ibopen 00001da0 T ibpad 00001a9c T ibrd 00001bb4 T ibrpp 00001c54 T ibrsv 00001df4 T ibsad 00001cb4 T ibsic 00001d64 T ibsre 00001f1c T ibstatus 00001e64 T ibtmo 00001f50 T ibwait 0000200c T ibwrt 000014b0 t init_MUTEX 0000278c t init_MUTEX 000011bc T init_board_array 0000138c T init_module 000014cc t init_timer 00001494 t init_waitqueue_head 00002810 t init_waitqueue_head U interruptible_sleep_on_timeout U jiffies 00001448 t list_add 00001468 t list_del 00000108 D myPAD 0000010c D mySAD 0000164c T osChngBase 0000166c T osChngDMA 0000165c T osChngIRQ 00001148 T osInit 000015e0 T osRemoveTimer 00001154 T osReset 00001574 T osStartTimer 00000104 D pollTimeidx 00001104 t prefetch U printk 000009d8 T read_ioctl U register_chrdev 000000e8 D registered_drivers 00001510 t sema_init 000027e8 t sema_init 00001614 t set_bit 00001b94 t set_bit 00001d30 t set_bit 0000210c t set_bit 00000dcc T status_ioctl 00000e50 t strcmp 00000110 D timeTable 00000100 D timeidx 00001634 t timer_pending U tvec_bases U unregister_chrdev 00000ea4 t up 000027d8 t up 00000ed0 t verify_area U vfree 000019d8 t vmalloc 00001538 T watchdog_timeout 00000c64 T write_ioctl =20 --=20 _____________________________________________________________ Marc Lefranc, Charg=E9 de Recherche au CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes, Mol=E9cules Bat P5, UFR de Physique Universit=E9 des Sciences et Technologies de Lille F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq CEDEX (FRANCE) e-mail: Mar...@un... Tel : +33 (0)3 20 33 64 50 ; FAX : +33 (0)3 20 33 70 20 _____________________________________________________________ |
From: frank m. h. <fm...@st...> - 2002-04-04 23:24:36
|
What is the ouput of 'depmod -e'? Frank On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, wrote: > > Hello, > > I have compiled linux-gpib-3.1.2 with no errors. However, when I do "make install", I get the following message: > > depmod -a 2.4.7-10custom > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/nec7210.o > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/tms9914.o > > I am running RedHat 7.2. Any ideas what might be happening here? > > Thank you, > > Tim Holmes > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > |
From: <tim...@ex...> - 2002-04-04 22:50:08
|
Hello, I have compiled linux-gpib-3.1.2 with no errors. However, when I do "make install", I get the following message: depmod -a 2.4.7-10custom depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/gpib-common.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/nec7210.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.7-10custom/misc/tms9914.o I am running RedHat 7.2. Any ideas what might be happening here? Thank you, Tim Holmes ------------------------------------------------ |