From: Andrew M. <ak...@li...> - 2008-10-25 20:46:56
|
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:58:19 +0200 Marcin Slusarz <mar...@gm...> wrote: > Add support for persistent console history, surviving > console switches. It allocates new scrollback buffer only when > user switches console for the first time. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <mar...@gm...> > Cc: Antonino Daplas <ad...@gm...> > Cc: Krzysztof Helt <krz...@wp...> > Cc: Andrew Morton <ak...@li...> > Cc: lin...@li... > --- > drivers/video/console/Kconfig | 11 ++++++ > drivers/video/console/vgacon.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/console/Kconfig b/drivers/video/console/Kconfig > index 2f50a80..09e3d98 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/console/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/video/console/Kconfig > @@ -43,6 +43,17 @@ config VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE > buffer. Each 64KB will give you approximately 16 80x25 > screenfuls of scrollback buffer > > +config VGACON_REMEMBER_SCROLLBACK > + bool "Remember scrollback buffer on console switch" > + depends on VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK > + default y > + help > + Say 'Y' here if you want the scrollback buffer to be remembered > + on console switch and restored when you switch back. > + > + Note: every VGA console will use its own buffer, but it will be > + allocated only when you switch to this console for the first time. I'd question the value in adding the config option. Why not make the feature unconditionally present? > > +#define SCROLLBACK_SIZE (CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE * 1024) > + > ... > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VGACON_REMEMBER_SCROLLBACK > +static struct vgacon_scrollback_info { > + void *data; > + int cnt; > + int tail; > + int cur; > + int rows; > + int size; > +} vgacon_scrollbacks[MAX_NR_CONSOLES]; Perhaps you were concerned about memory consumption? If so, it would be much much better to make this feature switchable at runtime (module parameter/boot option or a /proc or /sys knob). > +static int vgacon_last_vc_num; We have lots of global state here with no apparent locking protecting it. Possibly there's some higher-level lock which provides seralisation? If so, the addition of a comment explaining all this would be good. |