You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(7) |
2003 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(7) |
2004 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(15) |
2006 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Suresh C. M. <Ma...@Ga...> - 2004-03-20 03:42:51
|
Dear Friends, We are facing the problem of initializing the framebuffer for the below system. We are porting Xfree86 on to a new 32bit RISC processor. We have test FPGA system running at 4 Mega Hertz (Bogomips 0.16) on kernel 2.4.7. proposed system(ASIC) runs on ~300Mhz. My main concern is does Xfree86 can be tested on 2.6Mhz FPGA? What is the minimum clock speed required to run X? Our test system supports 2GB of RAM and it consists of PCI ATI Rage XL Graphics card. We started testing the generic vga16fb.c framebuffer.The basic intialization seems to happen perfectly.The problem comes in take_over_console,where framebuffer takes over the dummy console.In the take over console,at first step he is calling fbcon_startup which is getting screen base ,X and Y coordinates and clearing that location.This happens fine.This function is called for after some timer interval and hence we can say that it will be called repeatedly.The problem is that we cann't put any printk in between as it adversely affects the flow(This we found after testing vga16fb.c rigorously on intel as well as on our FPGA).We traversed the source code and also through object dumps and found that nothing is wrong.The system seems to be hung after some time(It is able to clear the screen).We came to this conclusion after giving a run and waiting for 6 hours. We think that speed might be a problem.We need to findout first whether we will be able to run a framebuffer driver at 4 MHZ.Since framebuffer does pixel by pixel access,we think it will take a lot of time and anything can happen in between.We are now not in a position to predict what is happening.Please give your points on whether the framebuffer will work at such a low speed. I request your suggestions on feasibility of initializing framebuffer and testing X on the above system. Regards, Suresh Chandra Mannava. -- Suresh Chandra Mannava Software Engineer, Cornet Technology India, Chennai. CSE, Research Student, Vellore Institute of Technology - India. Email: mannava(at)vit.ac.in, Mobile: +919884278813 |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-03-17 21:48:35
|
> After booting 2.6.5-rc1-mm1 with this command-line: > > kernel /vmlinuz-265rc1mm1 root=/dev/hda3 video=radeonfb:1600x1200-32@75 acpi=force > > I get a warning on my monitor: > > fH 271.5 kHz > fV 217.2 Hz I haven't seen that before :-/ The kernel isn't generating that. I just looked threw the code. > That is obviously not what I meant by 1600x1200-32@75. > > fbset -V tells me: > > Linux Frame Buffer Device Configuration Version 2.1 (23/06/1999) > (C) Copyright 1995-1999 by Geert Uytterhoeven > > > mode "1600x1200-75" > # D: 202.511 MHz, H: 93.755 kHz, V: 75.004 Hz > geometry 1600 1200 1600 1200 32 > timings 4938 304 64 46 1 192 3 > hsync high > vsync high > rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,0/0 > endmode This looks right. > Obviously, it's bad that I define what video-mode I want and radeonfb > starts changing that to bogus values. The monitor is an Eizo F931, > connected via a Rose Electronics Vista KVM. What is you want exactly? |
From: Jurriaan <thu...@xs...> - 2004-03-17 07:39:05
|
[this was meant to go to linux-kernel and fbdev-users at the same time, but I made a typo. sorry] After booting 2.6.5-rc1-mm1 with this command-line: kernel /vmlinuz-265rc1mm1 root=/dev/hda3 video=radeonfb:1600x1200-32@75 acpi=force I get a warning on my monitor: fH 271.5 kHz fV 217.2 Hz That is obviously not what I meant by 1600x1200-32@75. fbset -V tells me: Linux Frame Buffer Device Configuration Version 2.1 (23/06/1999) (C) Copyright 1995-1999 by Geert Uytterhoeven mode "1600x1200-75" # D: 202.511 MHz, H: 93.755 kHz, V: 75.004 Hz geometry 1600 1200 1600 1200 32 timings 4938 304 64 46 1 192 3 hsync high vsync high rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,0/0 endmode dmesg: Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 133x54 radeonfb: Found Intel x86 BIOS ROM Image radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=60) Memory=166.00 Mhz, System=166.00 MHz radeonfb: No connector info table detected radeonfb: Monitor 1 type CRT found radeonfb: ATI Radeon QD DDR SGRAM 64 MB lspci: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R100 QD [Radeon 7200] (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 7000/Radeon Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- Latency: 64 (2000ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x08 (32 bytes) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 0: Memory at d8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Region 1: I/O ports at a000 [size=256] Region 2: Memory at e5000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [58] AGP version 2.0 Status: RQ=48 Iso- ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64- HTrans- 64bit- FW- AGP3- Rate=x1,x2 Command: RQ=1 ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA+ AGP- GART64- 64bit- FW- Rate=<none> Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- .config: CONFIG_FB=y CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y CONFIG_FB_RADEON_I2C=y Obviously, it's bad that I define what video-mode I want and radeonfb starts changing that to bogus values. The monitor is an Eizo F931, connected via a Rose Electronics Vista KVM. Any hints on solving this? Thanks, Jurriaan -- Thesaurus (n): ancient reptile with excellent vocabulary. Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.4-rc1-mm2 3940 bogomips load av: 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-03-11 17:32:09
|
> > I have the specs and the hardware. > > Any news on that ? Did you manage to rescue the specs from your damaged > harddisk ? Not yet. I managed last night to finish the install on my system. |
From: Sven L. <sve...@wa...> - 2004-03-11 12:07:14
|
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:14:02PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:36:22PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > > > > Its a endian issue. Been there :-( The voodoo card needs to be set to big > > > endian access. > > > > Any hint on how to do that ? I have neither voodoo specs, nor access to > > the hardware, still i would very much like to have it working. > > I have the specs and the hardware. Any news on that ? Did you manage to rescue the specs from your damaged harddisk ? Friendly, Sven Luther |
From: Hihn, J. <Jas...@ve...> - 2004-03-09 13:58:59
|
That is correct... Had it worked immediately, I'd not have bothered to post ;-) With the adjusted pixel clock, I am able to select between 640x480x16bpp and 800x600x16bpp (perhaps others) using the vesa modes, without trouble. The weirdest thing was that fbset would change the patterns on the TV, so I thought it was working. It looks like everything was changing except the pixel clock... =09 -----Original Message----- From: Geert Uytterhoeven [mailto:ge...@li...]=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:17 AM To: Hihn, Jason Cc: lin...@li... Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-users] Frambeffer to TV troubles On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Hihn, Jason wrote: > I've got a ATI Graphics Expression+ PC2TV (ATI MACH64/Rage II GT) and I > finally got TV out to work. The perplexing thing was it's boot up and > you could see output on the TV (using composite out), but when asked for > a video mode it's lose it after that. I played around with fbset, > getting the monitor to do all kinds of funky things, but never a > picture. (I was playing with resolutions and timings) Oh, and I was > using the Vesa driver > > > > Then I went into include/linux/fb.h and made the default videomode's > timings as I wanted: 20330, 128, 32, 32, 8, 128, 5 (NTSC) which worked! > Now I use mode 0x311 and I can get a picture. It seems that the pixclock > is hardcoded to some non-NTSC compatible values. So if you pass these values using fbset, it doesn't work? Strange... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li... In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds |
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2004-03-09 10:34:27
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Hihn, Jason wrote: > I've got a ATI Graphics Expression+ PC2TV (ATI MACH64/Rage II GT) and I > finally got TV out to work. The perplexing thing was it's boot up and > you could see output on the TV (using composite out), but when asked for > a video mode it's lose it after that. I played around with fbset, > getting the monitor to do all kinds of funky things, but never a > picture. (I was playing with resolutions and timings) Oh, and I was > using the Vesa driver > > > > Then I went into include/linux/fb.h and made the default videomode's > timings as I wanted: 20330, 128, 32, 32, 8, 128, 5 (NTSC) which worked! > Now I use mode 0x311 and I can get a picture. It seems that the pixclock > is hardcoded to some non-NTSC compatible values. So if you pass these values using fbset, it doesn't work? Strange... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li... In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds |
From: Hihn, J. <Jas...@ve...> - 2004-03-08 21:00:58
|
I've got a ATI Graphics Expression+ PC2TV (ATI MACH64/Rage II GT) and I finally got TV out to work. The perplexing thing was it's boot up and you could see output on the TV (using composite out), but when asked for a video mode it's lose it after that. I played around with fbset, getting the monitor to do all kinds of funky things, but never a picture. (I was playing with resolutions and timings) Oh, and I was using the Vesa driver =20 Then I went into include/linux/fb.h and made the default videomode's timings as I wanted: 20330, 128, 32, 32, 8, 128, 5 (NTSC) which worked! Now I use mode 0x311 and I can get a picture. It seems that the pixclock is hardcoded to some non-NTSC compatible values.=20 =20 I quickly tried to get the ATI driver working, but I never succeeded. The Vesa driver works, but to try a new setting, I have to re-compile and reboot. =20 But I'd like to have it easier to do, I feel that I hacked it up and that I'm doing something wrong. Can anyone give me some pointers? I'd like to see my screen in 768x576 resolution, but there is no vesa mode for that. =20 Thanks =20 |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-03-08 19:30:40
|
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:36:22PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > > Its a endian issue. Been there :-( The voodoo card needs to be set to big > > endian access. > > Any hint on how to do that ? I have neither voodoo specs, nor access to > the hardware, still i would very much like to have it working. I have the specs and the hardware. |
From: Sven L. <sve...@wa...> - 2004-03-08 18:03:28
|
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:44:17PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > I have the specs on my hard drive that just crashed. I plan to recover the > data this week. It is possible to fix. Ok, thanks. Friendly, Sven Luther |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-03-08 18:00:55
|
I have the specs on my hard drive that just crashed. I plan to recover the data this week. It is possible to fix. On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:36:22PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > > Its a endian issue. Been there :-( The voodoo card needs to be set to big > > endian access. > > Any hint on how to do that ? I have neither voodoo specs, nor access to > the hardware, still i would very much like to have it working. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > |
From: Sven L. <sve...@wa...> - 2004-03-08 15:40:31
|
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:36:22PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > Its a endian issue. Been there :-( The voodoo card needs to be set to big > endian access. Any hint on how to do that ? I have neither voodoo specs, nor access to the hardware, still i would very much like to have it working. Friendly, Sven Luther |
From: Witold F. <wi...@po...> - 2004-03-01 23:14:04
|
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:40:36PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > Hello, > > Aty128fb in 2.6.3 and earlier doesn't work as it should for me. > > First, when CONFIG_VESA=Y I cannot load module aty128fb. > > You can load the module. You need to use the con2fb utility to map the > consoles to that framebuffer device. > > > Second, if VESA support is not compiled in I got black screen when switch > > to another console. I used to use mode 1024x768-75. (128x76) > > ??? What is your config like? What do you mean by switching to another > console. I'm sorry to bother you, it's OK now. Framebuffer was set by: for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8; do /usr/bin/open -c $i -- /usr/bin/fbset -fb /dev/fb/0 -depth 16 1024x768-75 done Adding -w resolves problems. > > Third, it is still slow. > > Its unaccelerated. It needs hardware acceleration. ATI 128 Rage Pro has hardware acceleration. What else is required? -- Witold Filipczyk tohu-bohu <wi...@po...> |
From: Witold F. <wi...@po...> - 2004-02-28 07:07:33
|
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:40:36PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > Hello, > > Aty128fb in 2.6.3 and earlier doesn't work as it should for me. > > First, when CONFIG_VESA=Y I cannot load module aty128fb. > > You can load the module. You need to use the con2fb utility to map the > consoles to that framebuffer device. > > > Second, if VESA support is not compiled in I got black screen when switch > > to another console. I used to use mode 1024x768-75. (128x76) > > ??? What is your config like? What do you mean by switching to another > console. ALT-F2, ALT-F3 Config in attachment. > > > > Third, it is still slow. > > Its unaccelerated. It needs hardware acceleration. -- Witold Filipczyk tohu-bohu <wi...@po...> |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-02-27 17:51:10
|
> Hello, > Aty128fb in 2.6.3 and earlier doesn't work as it should for me. > First, when CONFIG_VESA=Y I cannot load module aty128fb. You can load the module. You need to use the con2fb utility to map the consoles to that framebuffer device. > Second, if VESA support is not compiled in I got black screen when switch > to another console. I used to use mode 1024x768-75. (128x76) ??? What is your config like? What do you mean by switching to another console. > Third, it is still slow. Its unaccelerated. It needs hardware acceleration. |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-02-27 17:46:53
|
Its a endian issue. Been there :-( The voodoo card needs to be set to big endian access. On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Mikael Karlsson wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:22:25AM +0100, Mikael Karlsson wrote: > > > Hello... > > > > > > I got trouble to get the fbdev driver to work with XFree86 on my Pegasos > > > with A Voodoo4 card. I get corrupt colors in colordepth ove 8bits. I > > > tried to set the settings with fbset and so on. Is there anyway to get > > > this thing to work with 16bpp? > > > > These problems extend when using the X server with the fbdev driver, > > right ? > > Yes they do. I get very wired colors in X. It looks like rainbow > colors over the screen. In 8bpp modes it looks good and no corrupt colors. > I also tried the tdfx driver and it hangs in color depth over 8bpp. > > > /Mikael Karlsson > > > > > > > Friendly, > > > > Sven Luther > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-fbdev-users mailing list > > Lin...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Linux-fbdev-users mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-users > |
From: Mikael K. <lis...@hj...> - 2004-02-27 11:20:57
|
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:22:25AM +0100, Mikael Karlsson wrote: > > Hello... > > > > I got trouble to get the fbdev driver to work with XFree86 on my Pegasos > > with A Voodoo4 card. I get corrupt colors in colordepth ove 8bits. I > > tried to set the settings with fbset and so on. Is there anyway to get > > this thing to work with 16bpp? > > These problems extend when using the X server with the fbdev driver, > right ? Yes they do. I get very wired colors in X. It looks like rainbow colors over the screen. In 8bpp modes it looks good and no corrupt colors. I also tried the tdfx driver and it hangs in color depth over 8bpp. /Mikael Karlsson > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Linux-fbdev-users mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-users > |
From: Sven L. <sve...@wa...> - 2004-02-27 10:32:36
|
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:22:25AM +0100, Mikael Karlsson wrote: > Hello... > > I got trouble to get the fbdev driver to work with XFree86 on my Pegasos > with A Voodoo4 card. I get corrupt colors in colordepth ove 8bits. I > tried to set the settings with fbset and so on. Is there anyway to get > this thing to work with 16bpp? These problems extend when using the X server with the fbdev driver, right ? Friendly, Sven Luther |
From: Mikael K. <lis...@hj...> - 2004-02-27 07:31:27
|
Hello... I got trouble to get the fbdev driver to work with XFree86 on my Pegasos with A Voodoo4 card. I get corrupt colors in colordepth ove 8bits. I tried to set the settings with fbset and so on. Is there anyway to get this thing to work with 16bpp? /Mikael Karlsson |
From: Witold F. <wi...@po...> - 2004-02-27 06:45:20
|
Hello, Aty128fb in 2.6.3 and earlier doesn't work as it should for me. First, when CONFIG_VESA=Y I cannot load module aty128fb. Second, if VESA support is not compiled in I got black screen when switch to another console. I used to use mode 1024x768-75. (128x76) On 2.4 it works fine in both cases. Third, it is still slow. How can I help to fix these problems? -- Witold Filipczyk tohu-bohu <wi...@po...> |
From: Jean D. <kh...@li...> - 2004-02-16 19:27:12
|
Hi all, I decided to give a try to the new radeonfb driver (Linux 2.6.3-rc3) on my new Radeon 9200-based graphics card ("Ya" if that matters). The driver works overall good and could detect the correct DFP size with no parameter given, which is more than the Linux 2.4 driver was able to do. However, at the moment the driver is initialized, I got scambled output in the upper left hand corner of my screen. I've taken a snapshot of it using my webcam, available here: http://jdelvare.net1.nerim.net/radeonfb/radeonfb.jpeg Is it a known problem? Is there some parameter I can pass to the driver to prevent the problem? Or do I just have to live with it? It doesn't seem to cause trouble otherwise, so this is in no way a critical problem, but I'm a curious guy. Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ |
From: Samy C. <sa...@fr...> - 2004-02-08 13:18:54
|
hello vesafb is OK but I can't have framebuffer working for this chip (radeon IGP320M) on presario900 with radeon driver. I tried both methods: compiled with module and inside the kernel (2.4.24 and 2.6.2) my grub option is "video=radeon:1024x768" I elso tried "video=radeonfb:1024x768" I elso tried to follow the infos (kernel patch) from http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~cd9/radeonfb.html but nothing to do: still 80col, no linux bitmap and dmesg doesn't give any clue to radeonfb... Any advices/clues? cheers |
From: Michael G. <mi...@it...> - 2004-01-13 19:39:01
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:41:25 +0000 (GMT) James Simmons <jsi...@in...> wrote: > > Instead of modules can you buiold everything into your kernel and let me > know if you still have a problem. > > I haven't tried this yet, but I got it partly working with this patch. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1-rc1/2.6.1-rc1-mm1/broken-out/radeon-line-length-fix.patch Partly means, after patching a vanilla 2.6.1 with the above patch, the framebuffer works after insmodding the radeonfb module but: * Color depth 16 gives me a green or blue background * Color depth 24 gives "ioctl FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO: Invalid argument" * Switching from X to console blanks it. fbset -depth <other depth> brings it back again /Michael |
From: Kilian C. <kil...@cr...> - 2004-01-13 19:27:24
|
Hi all, First of all, my problem : I have a Dell D800 laptop (the problem is not here ^_^), with a wide 1920x1200 screen, and I'd like to run a framebuffer console in this mode, with a 2.6.x kernel. The video card is a nVidia GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go, and my X server uses the following modeline : "1920x1200" 162 1920 1968 2160 2176 1200 1201 1204 1206 +hsync +vsync Then , my experiments. I tried to use : - vesafb driver, from vanilla 2.6.1 : it runs ok in 1600x1200 (with vertical black bars, each side of the screen), since 1920x1200 is not a 'standard' VESA mode. I think it would be possible to add this 16:10 mode in modedb.c, or whatever vesafb uses, but I'm not experienced enough too really do it. - rivafb driver, from vanilla 2.6.1 : does not detect any framebuffer device at all, and run in plain old 80x25. Not what I want. So, I just tried the latest FBDev patch from James Simmons : - no change with vesafb, since I don't know which code I could put in the vga= kernel option - rivafb gives me no ouput at all : after decompressing the kernel image, when it usually switch to fb mode, the screen remains blank, with only two small colored dots, flashing middle left and up right of the screen. Not very usable. :) So I'd like to know : - is this video card supported by the rivafb driver ? - is it possible to add the 1920x1200 mode, for vesafb to use it ? - how can I help to add support for this configuration ? TIA, -- Kilian CAVALOTTI | GPGKeyId: 0xD657340C BOFH excuse #148: Insert coin for new game |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-01-13 18:41:28
|
Instead of modules can you buiold everything into your kernel and let me know if you still have a problem. On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Michael Guntsche wrote: > Hi, > > I have been running 2.4.2* with radeonfb on my Radeon Mobility 9000 on > an Acer TravelMate 800LCi without a problem. > But after switching to 2.6 the framebuffer no longer works. > > * The driver in vanilla 2.6 gives me distorted output. > * The driver from Ben's tree (penguinppc rsync) gives me distorted > output too. > * James latest fbdev.diff gives no output at all. (Only the backlight > stays on) > > Here is part of the syslog after inserting the module (patched with > fbdev.diff). > > modprobe radeonfb: > > > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: probed DDR SGRAM 65536k > videoram > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Invalid ROM signature 0 > should be 0xaa55 > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Used default PLL infos > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz > (RefDiv=67) Memory=166.00 Mhz, System=166.00 MHz > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: Starting monitor auto detection... > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: Non-DDC laptop panel detected > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Monitor 1 type LCD found > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Monitor 2 type no found > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: Guessing panel info... > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Asssuming panel size 1400x1050 > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: Power Management enabled for Mobility chipsets > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb: ATI Radeon Lf DDR SGRAM 64 MB > Jan 6 10:43:21 localhost kernel: radeonfb_pci_register END > > modprobe fbcon: > The screen blanks afterwards, but the machine still runs. > > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: hStart = 664, hEnd = 760, hTotal = 800 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: vStart = 409, vEnd = 411, vTotal = 450 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: h_total_disp = 0x4f0063^I hsync_strt_wid = 0x8c0292 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: v_total_disp = 0x18f01c1^I vsync_strt_wid = 0x820198 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: pixclock = 39729 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: freq = 2517 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: post div = 0x8 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: fb_div = 0x1f4 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: ppll_div_3 = 0x301f4 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: lvds_gen_cntl: 003dffa5 > Jan 6 13:11:00 localhost kernel: Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x25 > > Can someone tell me if radeonfb in 2.6 should work with my card right > now, or if this is a known problem? > > Thanks in advance, > Michael Guntsche > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > _______________________________________________ > Linux-fbdev-users mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-users > |