From: Kulwant B. <kul...@bt...> - 2003-01-07 00:39:46
|
Hello Geert, Thanks for your email. > mke2fs /dev/<DEVICE> Ok, I tried mke2fs dev/sdc because mke2fs /dev/sdc1 kinda obviously didn't work because LINUX can't see the partitions. And this is what I got: # mke2fs /dev/sdc mke2fs 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) /dev/sdc is entire device, not just one partition! proceed anyway (y,n) y filesystem label= OS type LINUX Block size = 4096 (log=2) Fragment size = 4096 bytes 636480 inodes, 1271205 blocks 63560 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super use. First data block=0 39 block groups (I think that was a 9 - I can't read my own writing!) 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 16320 inodes per group superblock backups stored on blocks: 32708, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736 Warning: Could not read block 0: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read. Writing inode tables: []1/39 ( [] was basically a black block cursor). At which point the machine appeared to hang (I left it for several minutes). It would accept a carriage return (I would get a new line) but I didn't get the command prompt (#) back - even after a Ctrl-C. So I rebooted. >> > 2. Does Linux recognize the blocksize during disk probing? E.g. for >> > my disks it says >> > | SCSI device sda: 8910423 512-byte hdwr sectors (4562 MB) >> > | SCSI device sdb: 6281856 512-byte hdwr sectors (3216 MB) >> > during startup. > Use `dmesg | less' or `dmesg | more'. Here is an excerpt of the relevant bits of the dmesg output: Total memory 96Mb. linux version 2.2.10 (root@pismo) (gcc version 2.95.2 20000220 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #1 Wed Jan 24 00:44:26 CET 2001 . . lots of other output about various other devices and drivers etc - all . looked ok. . SCSI: 1 host SCSI0: target 0 accepting period 200ns offset 8 5.00MHz Synchronous SCSI SCSI 0: setting target 0 to period 200ns offset 8 5.00MHz synchronous SCSI Vendor: COMPAQ Model DGHS18Y Type: Direct Access Rev 03F1 ANSI SCSI Revision 03 Detected SCSI disk sda at SCSI 0, Channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Vendor: SEAGATE Model ST34573LW Type: Direct Access Rev: 6246 ANSI SCSI Revision 02 SCSI device sda: hdwr sector=512 bytes. Sectors=35566000 [17366MB] [17.4GB] SCSI Device sdb: hdwr sector = 4096 bytes. Sectors = 1271205 [4964MB][5.0GB] SCSI Device sdc: hdwr sector = 4096 bytes. Sectors = 1271205 [4964MB][5.0GB] SCSI Device sdd: hdwr sector = 512 bytes. Sectors = 17773524 [8678MB][8.7GB] Partition check: sda: RDSK sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 sda5 sda6 sda7 sdb: sd.cBad block number/count requestedscsidisk I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 0 unable to read partition table. sdc: sd.cBad block number/count requestedscsidisk I/O error: dev 08:20, sector 0 unable to read partition table. sdd: RDSK sdd1 sdd2 sdd3 sdd4 sdd5 hda: RDSK hda1 hda2 hda3 EXT2 - fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended. VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) CFS: Disk change detected on device sr(11,0) attempt to access beyond end of device 0b:00: rw=0, want=33, limit=2 isofs_read_super: bread failed, dev=ob:00, iso_blknum=16. block=32 sd.cBad block number/count requestedscsidisk I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 0 sdc: sd.cBad block number/count requestedscsidisk I/O error: dev 08:20, sector 0 unable to read partition table. I did run e2fsck on dev/sdc and I basically got the same sort of error about sector 0, short read and the partition being "zero length?" etc. > The partitions look fine (cfr. your other email). So having Linux and > Amiga partitions shared on the 18 GB disk should work fine. Should? That doesn't sound like 100%. I I think I will try the 420Mb Connor first, now that I have the data from it backed up. Something makes me slightly uneasy about sharing AmigaOS native and foreign partitions on the same disk especially when the disk is >4Gb which in itself requires OS patches to get it recognised and working. Just being cautious :-). I included the bits about the speeds because on the Amiga side, my drives accept 10MHz synchronous. Why does LINUX manage only 5MHz? Does this get better with a proper installation? And I found the dmesg text output really slow on my Permidia2 based BVision. Is all this stuff running on the PPC exclusively? I was expecting blazing speeds....(my PPC is the 240MHz one). The output scrolled as slow as a full screen CLI with 68k CPU caches turned off. the 50MHz 68060 performs better than that on a normal 1024x768x24bit screen under AmigaOS... Kind regards, Kulwant |