From: Roman Z. <zi...@li...> - 2006-11-07 16:44:18
|
Hi, On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:55:33 +1100 > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <be...@ke...> > To: lin...@oz... > Subject: APUS and IOs question > > Somebody who understands APUS around ? > > In include/asm-ppc/io.h, we have a special definition of the PCI IO > accessors readw,writew,readl and writel for APUS that don't do byteswap > and also don't do barriers. > > This seems very bogus to me. Can somebody explain me why it's done that > way so I can then explain why it's broken ? :-) > > I will remove those definitions soon, so unless I get a very convincing > argument of why it has to be done that way on APUS, things might break > (APUS-specific drivers relying on those not swapping will have to be > fixed). That stuff is quite old and I only fixed it as needed, so I'm not 100% sure how it's used completely. Anyway, AFAICT they mainly used by non-APUS specific drivers, mainly that would be the permedia fb driver. To make things worse I think this hardware is connected with some simple PCI adapter working in big endian mode. Everything else should use the zorro specific functions, where I added an eieio(). I agree that it's a mess and I haven't worked on it for a long time, everytime I attempted to clean this stuff up, patches have been welcomed with such enthusiasm, that I'd rather continued hacking on something else... bye, Roman |