Re: [patch linux-apus 2.6.12] apus: fix-up compile failures

[Roman Z. <zi...@li...>]

Hi,

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, John W. Linville wrote:

> Actually, the warnings were specifically with the arguments in the
> write routines.

My compiler actually produced errors here, but I fixed differently here.
Anyway, please hold off with patches for a few days, some of these thing 
are already fixed in my tree and I want to test them first before I commit 
them.

>  I noticed that "__asm__ __volatile__" seems to be
> the more common usage , so I just changed it for consistency in all
> the routines.  Is this problematic?
> 
> Is there a meaningful difference between the two?

There is only a difference if you want to compile the source with the 
-ansi switch, which is pointless for the kernel and what makes them 
redundant, so I prefer them without underscores.

bye, Roman