Re: Kernel 2.4.21 (subject rewriting rules)

[<aw...@sw...>]

Hi

Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 17:29 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel D=E4nzer:=


> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 17:18, Andreas W=FCst wrote:
>>
>> Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 16:22 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel=20
>> D=E4nzer:
>>
>>> As for the subject tags, those can be added or filtered out by
>>> everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? :)
>>
>> I guess filtering on "X-Been-There:" is enough, no?
>
> Absolutely; the tags aren't necessary (or even very useful) for
> filtering. The question is: 'What do you want the subject to look like
> by default?' :)

As crufty as possible, no? ;)

Well, nonetheless, I guess there are two valid points for subject tags,=20=

namely if people can only read their mail via webmail, where they have=20=

no filtering. It would add for clarity a lot. And, if the subject=20
rewriting supports complex expressions with replacement and so on, i.e.=20=

you could filter out doubled tags, doubled Re's etc. But no idea if=20
this is possible. I guess sourceforge doesn't want to add this load to=20=

their mailservers.

--=20
Best wishes,
Andi=