From: Michel <mi...@da...> - 2002-08-07 14:36:10
|
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 12:45, Alan Buxey wrote:=20 >=20 > I'm 95% sure that I've found the problem with > 2.4.13 kernels. >=20 > its the f'ing GCC compiler. >=20 >=20 > 2.95.4 seems to be the culprit. last night I compiled > the 2.4.13 source with it....and we all know this kernel > works fine (Its the one i normally run anyway!)...but > after a compile on my current system it freezes at exactly > the same point as the 2.4.17 compile...at the IDE probing/detection > part, Have you verified that the 2.4.13 kernel that works was built with an older compiler, or that a different compiler produces a working kernel from curre= nt source? > 2.95.4 either has a nasty 603 bug...or optimises something away > which shouldnt be touched. It could also be binutils. > so, either we change things in our tree to stop this...or advice that > everyone leave 2.95.4 well alone and either backtrack to 2.95.2 or move u= p > to 3.x - anyone playing with 3.x? AFAIK 3.0 has problems, 3.1 is better. Debian will switch to 3.2 soon. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast |