From: <no...@so...> - 2002-01-16 13:48:38
|
Feature Requests item #483053, was opened at 2001-11-18 05:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355907&aid=483053&group_id=5907 Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Ken Tyler (kent) Summary: An Installer for LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 Initial Comment: It will be very useful concerning the difficulties of installing LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 using the old Redhat tree. Systems are pretty unstable and many applications don't run ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michel Daenzer (mdaenzer) Date: 2002-01-16 05:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=34113 I say no. :) See also the explanation in the request for a SuSE installer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken Tyler (kent) Date: 2001-11-20 00:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=34223 I've already had a go at this with no success. The structure on cd image I down loaded didn't match the X based installer script, couldn't make any sense of it. What I was considering doing was making the last redhat installer a bit more flexible so it could do the job with a minimum number of RPMS but without the RedHat/base/ dir. But is it worth it ? Ken. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michel Daenzer (mdaenzer) Date: 2001-11-18 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=34113 Assigning this to Ken, who did the earlier LinuxPPC installers. I honestly don't see the point in trying to support an arguably unmaintained distribution though, seeing as there is a well-maintained distribution, which even officially supports APUS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355907&aid=483053&group_id=5907 |