Re: Kernel 2.4.5-pre3

[Geert U. <ge...@li...>]

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Ken Tyler wrote:
> But under 2.4.5, X is much more stable, probably as good or nearly as good
> as another well known operating system. When it does crash, I've had about
> 6 so far, it returns to the initiating console and reports signal 4 and I
> think I saw signal 11 on one occasion. One thing that happens is that
> after X exits with a signal, the next command run, like ls, fails and
> reports illegal instruction but after that all is OK, I can restart X, do
> anything. 

This either means bad RAM or so, or a bug in the kernel MM.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds