|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2001-05-15 14:58:59
|
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:49:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote: > > > > Don't you need some part of AmigaOS to make a floppy bootable? > > > > > > no, and yes. Under AmigaOS you run 'install df0:' but this doesnt > > > put any files onto the disk as such, it just writes a bootblock > > > (a few hundred bytes) to the floppy. Theres no reason why we couldnt have > > > an AmigaOS bootblock and write it to disk with 'dd' > > But the bootblock is code. Of course we can reverse engineer and clean room > reimplement one (IIRC it justs opens dos.library and returns 1 or 0). > > > but you do get access to the CLI if i remember well, isn't it ? > > Yep. But it's quite useless without real commands on the disk :-) Well, but it could call the ami/apus boot launching script. We could even have a (self written) little ask and choose program, or could that be done with just a script ? > > > theres no issue of copyright with bootable floppies. PD software has been > > > on such things for years. I guess as a last resort we can create a > > > bootable emegency floppy, compact it into ADF format and then it can go > > > onto the CD - and users can make it themselves from under AmigaOS with > > > transADF and the like? > > > > why not a plain gzipped tarball or lha archive ? > > Because it's easier to mess up things with tar/lha than with ADF or DMS? > Alternatively, let them use gunzip and dd :-) anything you feel best. Friendly, Sven Luther |