Re: Compilation errors next part

[Michel <mic...@ii...>]

Ren=E9 Thol wrote:

> > > Meanwhile I think I've the buggiest Linux of all! Nothing works, ne=
ither
> > > 2.4 comilation nor CD-burning (I've got 2 blank CDs with 4MB on the=
m,
> > > cdrecord made with the only 2.4 kernel I ever made; after 4 MB some=
 kind
> > > of timeout occurs!; I won't take this 2.4 kernel again, cause it ha=
ngs
> > > the whole Linux after a while (have to press Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga then)=
!)!
> >
> > From your experience (most of all the apparently-non-deterministic
> > signals 11 and 4) I suspect you could suffer from hardware problems. =
Do
> > you use the 60nsram option?
>=20
> Not yet (I suppose), cause Linux told me today 70nsram,

Okay. I wasn't suggesting using that option, I suspected it might cause
problems.


> (seems that I've only 127 and less MB of RAM, while I've 4x32MB
> installed on PPC card! Avail within AmigaOS bootet with no startup also
> shows only 127MB after switching on the machine! Does anybody know why?=
 Does
> the PPC-card with all patches and so installed eat such much RAM, befor=
e the
> system gets it?)!

In AmigaOS, yes. In Linux it's the kernel.


--=20
Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)    \   Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) de=
veloper
CS student, Free Software enthusiast   \        XFree86 and DRI project m=
ember