From: <fh...@at...> - 2000-10-18 01:02:57
|
In <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010171602340.394-100000@cassiopeia.home>, on 10/17/00 at 04:09 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@li...> said: >On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 fh...@at... wrote: >> So, have I got this right? Setup has: >To find out that unknown location, you can replace the `7' by some easy >to find unique value (whatever that may mean, e.g. 0xdeadbeef or >0xdeadcode or 0xfAedbeef (looks like Fredbeef :-)) and search for it in >memory after running the DSP script. How to I search the memory? grep deadcode /dev/kmem ? >> So, why is the physical address of the script at the top of memory but the >> physical address of ncr_cache down at the bottom of memory? >Indeed weird. Perhaps the DSP doesn't have access to all memory. The script code is allocated by a different method then the ncb structure. (I think.) The cache variable is in the ncb structure. >That 64 MB RAM is on the CSPPC and not on your A4000 motherboard, right? I have 64MB of RAM on the CSPPC. >> Are virt_to_bus() and virt_to_phys() the same on your platform? >I don't think we know that yet... What should be the difference? Fred |