From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-10-10 14:22:18
|
Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 04:09:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > > > Maybe i could try it out on my work box, using XF4 on top of my G400 > > > > > framebuffer. > > > > > > > > I don't think the bug would show up there. The glint driver is still > > > > the only one (besides fbdev) which uses fbdevhw in Probe(). > > > > > > What about a permedia2 board then ? Maybe i should write a fbdev for my > > > dual pm3 board, i wanted to do it anyway. But the current fbdev support > > > in the glint driver would have to be changed anyway, as the permedia3 is > > > a 128 bit chip, unlike the permedia2. > > > > I don't see where that would be a problem wrt fbdev? > > Well, in the glint driver, you make assumption that the detected chip is a > pm2. but the pm3 is quite different. I don't remember well, but they would > be some things to change. It is not much, but it needs checking. I see. That only applies if fbdevhw was needed for _probing_, which isn't the case for a PCI system. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |