From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-10-10 14:14:06
|
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 04:09:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > Maybe i could try it out on my work box, using XF4 on top of my G400 > > > > framebuffer. > > > > > > I don't think the bug would show up there. The glint driver is still the > > > only one (besides fbdev) which uses fbdevhw in Probe(). > > > > What about a permedia2 board then ? Maybe i should write a fbdev for my dual > > pm3 board, i wanted to do it anyway. But the current fbdev support in the > > glint driver would have to be changed anyway, as the permedia3 is a 128 bit > > chip, unlike the permedia2. > > I don't see where that would be a problem wrt fbdev? Well, in the glint driver, you make assumption that the detected chip is a pm2. but the pm3 is quite different. I don't remember well, but they would be some things to change. It is not much, but it needs checking. > > > > Anyway, this would be difficult if done without a working box in front > > > > to test it. > > > > > > I think it's not impossible that the bug would even show up if you tried > > > to use the glint driver with only amifb. > > > > huh ? > > The glint driver doesn't know if pm2fb is there before it finds out ;) Maybe > the problem is there. Then it might also segfault when there is only amifb > (like it does when there is only pm2fb). > > > Anyway, i will be giving it a look this week end. > > Thanks Sven. No problem, ... Sven Luther |