Re: affstools 0.1

[Geert U. <ge...@li...>]

On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > The same bug is present in the kernel, even in 2.0.38 (the oldest version I
> > have here). I'm wondering how it got there, since it once was OK (IIRC, I added
> > support for muFS and other/group protection in 1994). Or am I missing
> > something?
> 
> Was it before or after write support? According to the Changes, that was
> somewhere in 1.3 and on the ftp sites I only find 2.0.x and up...

Look in the `old' directory. Or was it deleted?

> > I also compiled with -Wall and created the patch below. Personally I would use
> > __u32 to store 32-bit values (i.e. `LONG' under AmigaOS), and __u16 for 16-bit
> > values, to avoid portability problems.
> 
> I probably add some more configure tests for that. :)
> Thanks for the patch. I'm using -Wall too, but I got no warnings for that 
> (using gcc 2.95.2 here).

I'm using i486-linux/2.7.2.3 here. Time to upgrade to potato :-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds