Re: 2.2.16 ?

[Michel <da...@re...>]

Ken Tyler wrote:

> > What do you people think, would it be easier to replace the whole tree
> > with native 2.2.16 now, then apply the m68k diff and finally try to get
> > our stuff back in, or rather unapply the 2.2.10 m68k diff, apply relative
> > diffs from 2.2.10 to 2.2.16, apply the m68k and fix our stuff?
> 
> After a pause ...
> 
> Is it really worth the effort to update to 2.2.16 given that 2.3 is almost
> working ?

That's a point, but I think most "normal" users only track development in 2.2
and so we could show them that we are making progress and not dead.


> What changed between 2.2.10 and .16 ?

Dunno exactly...


Michel


-- 
Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it.
______________________________________________________________________________
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS