Re: 2.2.16 ?

[Ken T. <ke...@we...>]

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:

> What do you people think, would it be easier to replace the whole tree with
> native 2.2.16 now, then apply the m68k diff and finally try to get our stuff
> back in, or rather unapply the 2.2.10 m68k diff, apply relative diffs from
> 2.2.10 to 2.2.16, apply the m68k and fix our stuff?

After a pause ...

Is it really worth the effort to update to 2.2.16 given that 2.3 is almost
working ?

What changed between 2.2.10 and .16 ?

Ken.