Re: CVS on sourceforge

[Michel <dae...@st...>]

Roman Zippel wrote:

> > Which one will you do ? provide the patch, or commit the patch ?
> 
> I can do both, just tell me what you prefer, but the diff to the bitkeeper
> tree will be larger (but I can omit nonrelevant changes like added/removed
> files in non-m68k/ppc dirs).

I'd say commit it.


> > i am checkin out the 2.3 tree, but it seems to be quite slow, ...
> 
> I'm noticing that too. :)
> Anyway, which kernel do we take as base kernel? Most relevant are in the
> main tree, but the bitkeeper tree is still more uptodate for ppc stuff. On
> the other hand creating a release would be quite easy  with the main tree.
> Keeping both in there is possible too, but creates quite some work.

If someone can keep the bitkeeper tree up to date, I think having that one
would be better. As Jesper pointed out, making diffs to the native tree is
easy.


Michel


-- 
It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.
______________________________________________________________________________
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS