Re: CVS on sourceforge

[Alan B. <al...@ms...>]

hi,

> Well, yes, but 2.2 is end of live, so no need to synchronize it with the
> bitkeeper /whatever tree, it is more an issue of the 2.2 m68k tree (which is
> no more maintained, because 2.3 works on m68k, ...

doesnt m68k get 2.2.14 etc then? Or are they [users + developers] all over
on 2.3.x now ?


still on LinuxAPUS we are on 2.2.10 with no sight of 2.2.14  (what are the
issues? At least on sourceforge it'll be easier to keep track of the
problems via the noticeboard systems)


looking forward to the new era...it seems that sourceforge will remove a
bottleneck by centralising resources...and we can look at 2.3.x ernestly

alan