Re: CVS on sourceforge

[Sven L. <lu...@dp...>]

On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:33:43PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote:
> hi,
> 
> > i don't think it make sense for the 2.2 tree, since it is only a temporary
> > solution until we find the bug in the 2.3 kernel ?
> 
> ummm, I'd like to see the 2.2 tree alive and well, after all, 2.3 is the
> development branch and people like me will like to have easy CVS access to
> 2.2.x to make the kernels for users until 2.4.x arrives  8-)

Well, yes, but 2.2 is end of live, so no need to synchronize it with the
bitkeeper /whatever tree, it is more an issue of the 2.2 m68k tree (which is
no more maintained, because 2.3 works on m68k, ...

> > BTW, it would be nice if we had something like a blackboard where everyone
> > could write stuff, and use that for a recapitulation of all that has
> > transpired about this 2.3 issue. 
> 
> well, quite a few 2.3.x issues seem to be getting fixed on a weekly basis
> - but are all the patches submitted being applied? maybe some passed
> through unseen?

Don't know, ...

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER