From: Sven L. <sve...@wa...> - 2004-02-26 21:19:31
|
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:31:28AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Hello, > > As you may already know, there has been a security issue discovered, > which was fixed for debian/woody in : > > http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-440 > > for the 2.4.17 kernels. > > That said, the 2.4.20 kernel used in the testing/unstable -apus kernels > was not fixed, and has furthermore been mostly ignored since june 2003 > or so, security wise. I think the debian security team thought that > those were already built from the powerpc kernels, and didn't need a > apus specific package, thus never adviced Michel. Backporting 6 month of > fixes to 2.4.20 would be lot of work, work most probably more > meaningful to spend integrating the apus patches into the powerpc > package, or forward port them to 2.4.24 or 2.4.25. > > Ok, what i really want to know if there is an idea of how many people > still use apus, and of those, how many use the debian kernels, and from > those, which distribution and which kernel do you use. > > Geert, is the linux-m68k/linux-apus counting web page still active ? > > Furthermore, i don't have apus hardware anymore, so i would welcome > someone who would like to test those kernels for me, once i build them. > Simon, maybe you could do that ? Which kernels do you use ? Mmm, i wonder what is the latest 2.2 kernel to run apus ? Debian 2.2 apus kernel in woody is 2.2.10 only, while other powerpc is 2.2.20. Were the apus patches ported to later 2.2 kernels or were there problems with them ? Also, do someone of you still per chance has kernel-source-2.2.10 around ? Friendly, Sven Luther |