linux-apus-devel

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Michel <dae...@st...>]

Alan Buxey wrote:

> the documentation is now back online at http://linux-apus.sourceforge.net

Thanks Alan.


> could some people please download or read the docs and we can then startup
> a discussion of changes to be made/added to this....

One thing that bothers me is that both the 'Kernels' & 'Boothack' and 'Docs' &
'FAQ" links point to the same location.


BTW, I've finally come around to converting the site to use a template for all
pages. It's done in PHP (which also does the 'last updated' thing
automagically :), please have a look at the new files. In case I've done
something wrong, I've moved the old plain HTML files to a new obsolete/ dir.

Oh, and Sinan: Please stop writing the HTML files back again ;)


Michel


PS: If you don't like that the names of the files have changed, I can revert
them easily...

-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and The DRI Project

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Alan B. <al...@ms...>]

hi,

> > could some people please download or read the docs and we can then startup
> > a discussion of changes to be made/added to this....
> 
> One thing that bothers me is that both the 'Kernels' & 'Boothack' and 'Docs' &
> 'FAQ" links point to the same location.

do they? ouch. the kernel should point to the modules page, as should the
boothack really. the FAQ should point to the documents that we currently
have, and the docs should point ot a new page that cotains documents about
other bits....info about the bootstrap/kernels etc for example.

alan

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Michel <dae...@st...>]

Alan Buxey wrote:

> > > could some people please download or read the docs and we can then
> > > startup a discussion of changes to be made/added to this....
> >
> > One thing that bothers me is that both the 'Kernels' & 'Boothack' and
> > 'Docs' & 'FAQ" links point to the same location.
> 
> do they? ouch. the kernel should point to the modules page, as should the
> boothack really.

They both do now, I've changed this.


> the FAQ should point to the documents that we currently have, and the docs
> should point ot a new page that cotains documents about other bits....info
> about the bootstrap/kernels etc for example.

These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out
:)


Michel


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and The DRI Project

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Alan B. <al...@ms...>]

hi,

> These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out
> :)

well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ
should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document.
 ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on 

alan

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Sven L. <lu...@dp...>]

On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:16:57PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote:
> hi,
> 
> > These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out
> > :)
> 
> well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ
> should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document.
>  ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on 

What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ?

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Alan B. <al...@ms...>]

hi,

> What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ?

that'd be a start :-)

alan

Re: Linux-APUS docs

[Michel <da...@re...>]

Sven LUTHER wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:16:57PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > > These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out
> > > :)
> >
> > well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ
> > should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document.
> >  ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on
> 
> What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ?

That's how it is currently. The 'problem' is that the 'Docs' link currently
also points to the FAQ.


Michel


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and the DRI project