From: <hei...@at...> - 2000-08-26 13:48:55
|
How do I download the latest development APUS kernel? I didn't see the instructions last time I looked a sourceforge but sometimes I can't see the nose on my face :) Fred |
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-08-26 21:41:16
|
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 09:49:23AM -0400, hei...@at... wrote: > How do I download the latest development APUS kernel? cvs -d:pserver:.... checkout unstable ^^^ sorry i don't remeber actual path of course You have to login first (unless You did that in the past) On a side note: i was running 2.4.0-test4 for a couple of days. I had some problems: 1. some daemons exited with signal 4 (ProFTPd seemed to be leader) 2. X exited at random (sometimes with signal 11 but most of the time it was signal 4 3. latest X package couldn't be run ( i guess this is because of missing APUS PCI support) At first i thought it was some problem with my hardware but after switching to 2.2.10 all problems are gone My hardware 603e@160MHz 64MB RAM, BVision, Ariadne I'll checkout test7 and report ASAP =o) -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
From: <fh...@at...> - 2000-08-26 21:57:09
|
In <200...@yo...>, on 08/26/00 at 11:40 PM, Robert Ramiega <ro...@pl...> said: >On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 09:49:23AM -0400, hei...@at... wrote: > > On a side note: >i was running 2.4.0-test4 for a couple of days. I had some problems: 1. >some daemons exited with signal 4 (ProFTPd seemed to be leader) 2. X >exited at random (sometimes with signal 11 but most of the time it was >signal 4 I have trouble with X 4.0.1 exiting with signal 7 under 2.2.10. >3. latest X package couldn't be run ( i guess this is because of missing >APUS PCI support) > At first i thought it was some problem with my hardware but after >switching to 2.2.10 all problems are gone > My hardware 603e@160MHz 64MB RAM, BVision, Ariadne I have a 604e@200MHz. Fred |
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-08-29 09:37:02
|
hi, > I have trouble with X 4.0.1 exiting with signal 7 under 2.2.10. really? are you running only Permedia, or are you also running AGA too? I ask because yesterday I was running X for around 6 hours playing some of the Lokigames demos. funny bug in RailRoad Tycoon....my trains got all messed up and carriages became Stephenson Rockets, but I believe thats game-side... fullscreen DGA worked fine :-) alan |
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-08-26 22:28:17
|
Hi, > I'll checkout test7 and report ASAP =o) Don't do it yet, unless you don't need swap space... I'm working on it, but so far I don't really know what's going on here. bye, Roman |
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-08-28 06:31:08
|
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 12:19:42AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > > I'll checkout test7 and report ASAP =o) > > Don't do it yet, unless you don't need swap space... > I'm working on it, but so far I don't really know what's going on here. hmm... no i can't live without swap =o(( so i just wait two additional questions 1. some time ago i checkouted 2.4.0-test4 from CVS, than i updated it to latest (test7). After this make oldconfig failed with message about some missing Configure.in in one of subdirs. Unfortunately i just wiped the sources and didn't write down the message. Anyway after this i simply checkout from CVS again and this time make oldconfig didn't complain. Anyone can explain this to me? 2. I thought that everything is ok now with AFFS in 2.4 kernels, but i think there are still some problems. I compiled 2.4-test4a again (under 2.4test4) and copied it to AFFS partition. After this diff said that files differ. So am i wrong about working AFFS in 2.4 ? Or it's some other problem (related 2.4) (affs partition is 120MB and vmlinux is at 1760008 bytes) -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-08-28 07:41:08
|
Robert Ramiega wrote: > 1. some time ago i checkouted 2.4.0-test4 from CVS, than i updated it to > latest (test7). After this make oldconfig failed with message about some > missing Configure.in in one of subdirs. Unfortunately i just wiped the > sources and didn't write down the message. Anyway after this i simply > checkout from CVS again and this time make oldconfig didn't complain. Anyone > can explain this to me? It's best to always run 'cvs update -dP' so that old directories get pruned and new ones created automatically. You can set default options for all cvs commands in ~/.cvsrc, here's mine: cvs -z4 diff -u update -dP checkout -P Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project |
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-08-28 08:34:20
|
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 09:37:50AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Robert Ramiega wrote: > > > 1. some time ago i checkouted 2.4.0-test4 from CVS, than i updated it to > > latest (test7). After this make oldconfig failed with message about some > > missing Configure.in in one of subdirs. Unfortunately i just wiped the > > sources and didn't write down the message. Anyway after this i simply > > checkout from CVS again and this time make oldconfig didn't complain. Anyone > > can explain this to me? > > commands in ~/.cvsrc, here's mine: > > cvs -z4 > diff -u > update -dP > checkout -P Already have that (i guess this was published here around the time we moved to SourceForge) =o)) Any other ideas? -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-08-28 08:40:59
|
Robert Ramiega wrote: > > > 1. some time ago i checkouted 2.4.0-test4 from CVS, than i updated it to > > > latest (test7). After this make oldconfig failed with message about some > > > missing Configure.in in one of subdirs. Unfortunately i just wiped the > > > sources and didn't write down the message. Anyway after this i simply > > > checkout from CVS again and this time make oldconfig didn't complain. > > > Anyone can explain this to me? > > > > update -dP > > > Already have that (i guess this was published here around the time we moved > to SourceForge) =o)) Oops, sorry. > Any other ideas? Maybe you were unlucky and updated after Roman had imported the new version but before he had fixed the conflicts. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project |
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-08-28 08:47:24
|
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Robert Ramiega wrote: > > > > update -dP > > > > > Already have that (i guess this was published here around the time we moved > > to SourceForge) =o)) > > Oops, sorry. ?? why to be sorry ? It was my fault (i should mention the options used while updating but to be honest i simply forgot about .cvsrc =o)) > > Maybe you were unlucky and updated after Roman had imported the new version > but before he had fixed the conflicts. yes, that might be right =o)) (didn't think about that also =o)) -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-08-28 09:58:36
|
Hi, > > Any other ideas? > > Maybe you were unlucky and updated after Roman had imported the new version > but before he had fixed the conflicts. That shouldn't make a difference, config files weren't affected. Anyway, a 'make clean dep' is usually a good idea after a major update. bye, Roman |
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-08-28 10:05:13
|
Hi, > 2. I thought that everything is ok now with AFFS in 2.4 kernels, but i think > there are still some problems. I compiled 2.4-test4a again (under 2.4test4) > and copied it to AFFS partition. After this diff said that files differ. So > am i wrong about working AFFS in 2.4 ? Or it's some other problem (related > 2.4) (affs partition is 120MB and vmlinux is at 1760008 bytes) Sorry, no news here. I still have to look into it. bye, Roman |
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-08-27 18:32:53
|
hei...@at... wrote: > > How do I download the latest development APUS kernel? > > I didn't see the instructions last time I looked a sourceforge > but sometimes I can't see the nose on my face :) Looking at the CVS Repository page: cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/linux-apus login and then cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/linux-apus co modulename > I have trouble with X 4.0.1 exiting with signal 7 under 2.2.10. A bus error? Never heard of that. Have you built it yourself (as usual :) ? Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project |
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-12-14 10:57:52
|
hi, I'm sorry to report...and this is REALLY the most annoying news ever...but the FAQ information has been wiped away again. SF have not taken any steps to remedy the loss of the data earlier this year, and it looks like they wont help this time either - even though it seems to be some adminstrative chore of theirs which wipes our data off the disk! (note: The FAQ system is run via web scripts and thus files created/modified are owned by nobody) I propose to hold the FAQ on another system. One which does not have this problem...and one which I have a full backup/restore control system for. I can set up the FAQ engine in next to no time. its the information which we once held...which is lost...which I am most annoyed about. Rest assured, if the move is voted for (I'm only talking about APUS docs/FAQs) then this wont happen again (note: FAQ-O-Matics can be mirrored or sucked across to new sites). I am afraid/worried for the security of our APUS CVS kernel at SF now.... :-( yours Dr Alan Buxey, Linux-apus support manager guy -- Systems & Network Manager |
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-12-14 12:17:44
|
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 11:57, Alan Buxey wrote: > I propose to hold the FAQ on another system. One which does not have this= =20 > problem...and one which I have a full backup/restore control system for. Do you already have a specific new host for the FAQ-o-matic in mind? --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast |
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-12-14 14:22:36
|
hi, > > I propose to hold the FAQ on another system. One which does not have this > > problem...and one which I have a full backup/restore control system for. > > Do you already have a specific new host for the FAQ-o-matic in mind? I can host it locally here - but if you have an ideal candidate I am all ears (are you thinking of the GNU opensoftware server?) alan |
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-12-14 14:56:08
|
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 15:22, Alan Buxey wrote: > > > I propose to hold the FAQ on another system. One which does not have = this=20 > > > problem...and one which I have a full backup/restore control system f= or. > >=20 > > Do you already have a specific new host for the FAQ-o-matic in mind? >=20 > I can host it locally here - but if you have an ideal candidate I am all=20 > ears (are you thinking of the GNU opensoftware server?) No, my idea would have been penguinppc.org or something. But then, thinking about it, couldn't we just leave it on sf.net? We could chown the files in a cronjob and make backups via ssh, more suggestions welcome. --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast |
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2001-12-14 15:12:50
|
hi, > But then, thinking about it, couldn't we just leave it on sf.net? We > could chown the files in a cronjob and make backups via ssh, more > suggestions welcome. no chown'ing - they NEED to be nobody or they cannot be updated or edited backups would be okay i guess.....FAQ-o-matic has RCS backups....trouble was that those RCS files were in the same directory area that got wiped clean :-( alan |
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-12-14 20:47:11
|
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 16:12, Alan Buxey wrote: > > But then, thinking about it, couldn't we just leave it on sf.net? We > > could chown the files in a cronjob and make backups via ssh, more > > suggestions welcome. >=20 > no chown'ing - they NEED to be nobody or they cannot be updated or edited No possibility with group ownership, write permission for everybody, ... ? --=20 Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast |