Menu
▾
▴
linux-apus-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(210) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(167) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(218) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(71) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(179) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2000-09-13 09:57:03
|
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Michel Dänzer wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus > Module name: 2.2 > Repository: 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/ > Changes by: mda...@sl.... 00/09/12 05:15:19 > > Modified files: > 2.2/arch/ppc/: config.in > 2.2/arch/ppc/kernel/: head.S ppc_ksyms.c > 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/: init.c > > Log message: > add MOL support Hello Michel, Have these changes made it yet ? I just did a cvs diff and see nothing new. Ken. |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-13 09:52:40
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > > 2.2/arch/ppc/: config.in > > 2.2/arch/ppc/kernel/: head.S ppc_ksyms.c > > 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/: init.c > > > > Log message: > > add MOL support > > does it work? Dunno. Read my post with the subject 'MOL'. > I guess a pre-compile 'user-ready' kernel is now needed, then the info can > be released to the masses :-) Please test it yourself before doing so. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-09-13 09:47:31
|
hi, > 2.2/arch/ppc/: config.in > 2.2/arch/ppc/kernel/: head.S ppc_ksyms.c > 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/: init.c > > Log message: > add MOL support does it work? I guess a pre-compile 'user-ready' kernel is now needed, then the info can be released to the masses :-) alan |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-13 08:22:19
|
Frank Petzold wrote: > > fter the patches to mm -test7 boots again (for me). But I can't load > any modules, because they are installed in different paths than test6 and > earlier. I am using debian/potato, does the woody version of modutils > recognize the new modules paths? Yup. 2.3.14 or later is needed AFAIK. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: <fp...@zu...> - 2000-09-13 07:02:59
|
fter the patches to mm -test7 boots again (for me). But I can't load any modules, because they are installed in different paths than test6 and earlier. I am using debian/potato, does the woody version of modutils recognize the new modules paths? -- Frank Petzold, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Säumerstrasse 4, CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland, Tel. +41-1-724-84-42 Fax. +41-1-724-89-56 Business email: fp...@zu... Private email: pe...@he... The opinions expressed here are mine and not necessarily those of IBM. |
|
From: <fh...@at...> - 2000-09-13 01:12:15
|
In <39B...@re...>, on 09/12/00 at 01:49 PM, Michel Dänzer <da...@re...> said: >Francois Prowse wrote: >> Will the UltraWide controller on the CyberstormPPC cards ever be >> supported....I have found reference to a patch for the 53c770 controller, >> which the Cyberstorm should be compatable with. Anyone using this...? I >> have it if anyone would like a copy. I believe this was underway for the >> Cyberstorm.... I have worked on a driver off and on for awhile. I haven't got it to work at all yet. I'd like to see the patch. It may be the same file that I have, 53c770.tar.gz. Fred |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-12 23:18:19
|
The commit notices are pending for unknown reasons, but I have applied the MOL 'patches' to the 2.2 tree. No branch, the changes are really minimal. So minimal I can hardly believe it works (why is NO_RELOAD_HTAB undef'd in mm/init.c while it remains defined in kernel/head.S?), but the ones who are so eager about MOL should try. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-12 21:01:25
|
Robert Ramiega wrote: > 1. Can I "check" PCI for Permedia2 and use new boothack or should i > "uncheck" it and use old one? It hasn't worked for me yet (the kernels didn't even boot, and as debug=mem doesn't work...), and for pm2fb you need to use an old boothack anyway I suppose. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-09-12 19:37:11
|
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:33:48PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > > The problem with swap is also fixed ? > > Yes, swap uses vmalloc() and that didn't really work (actually it did > work, but it was covered by a too large bat mapping). Thanks Two more questions: 1. Can I "check" PCI for Permedia2 and use new boothack or should i "uncheck" it and use old one? 2. Is AFFS fixed ? (i'm compiling it right now and if it compiles i'll try to boot it) > > > have to hurry than and cvs co/update asap than =o)))) > > As Michel already said, you can always go back and with "cvs update -A" > you get the latest version again. Thanks for the hint (to Michel and You). I keep forgetting about this =o) -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-12 18:38:23
|
Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:16:57PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote: > > hi, > > > > > These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out > > > :) > > > > well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ > > should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document. > > ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on > > What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ? That's how it is currently. The 'problem' is that the 'Docs' link currently also points to the FAQ. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-09-12 18:38:09
|
hi, > What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ? that'd be a start :-) alan |
|
From: Michel D. <mda...@us...> - 2000-09-12 18:38:07
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.2 Repository: 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/ Changes by: mda...@sl.... 00/09/12 05:15:19 Modified files: 2.2/arch/ppc/: config.in 2.2/arch/ppc/kernel/: head.S ppc_ksyms.c 2.2/arch/ppc/mm/: init.c Log message: add MOL support |
|
From: Michel D. <mda...@us...> - 2000-09-12 18:38:04
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.2 Repository: 2.2/arch/ppc/ Changes by: mda...@sl.... 00/09/12 05:22:11 Modified files: 2.2/arch/ppc/: config.in Log message: remove duplicate config entry |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-09-12 17:46:42
|
Hi, > The problem with swap is also fixed ? Yes, swap uses vmalloc() and that didn't really work (actually it did work, but it was covered by a too large bat mapping). > have to hurry than and cvs co/update asap than =o)))) As Michel already said, you can always go back and with "cvs update -A" you get the latest version again. bye, Roman |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-12 17:06:15
|
I noticed that the 2.2 tree has a merge_2-2-16 branch (which I created) and a merge-2-2-16 one. If you create branches, please check that there isn't one for the same purpose already. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-09-12 09:25:03
|
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:16:57PM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote: > hi, > > > These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out > > :) > > well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ > should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document. > ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on What about pointing the FAQ link to the faq subpart of the document ? Friendly, Sven LUTHER |
|
From: Michel <da...@re...> - 2000-09-12 08:37:54
|
Robert Ramiega wrote: > > Probably on wednesday I'm going to update to test8 and break everything > > again. :) > have to hurry than and cvs co/update asap than =o)))) Note that you can always update to older revisions, AFAIK Roman tags the tree before every import, a cvs stat -v Makefile (or any other file in the tree for that matter) will show you the available tags. cvs upd -r tag gives you that revision. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project |
|
From: Robert R. <ro...@pl...> - 2000-09-12 08:23:27
|
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:45:22AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > > Log message: > > more mm fixes > > I really hope I did find now everything, a working kernel so far was very The problem with swap is also fixed ? > Probably on wednesday I'm going to update to test8 and break everything > again. :) have to hurry than and cvs co/update asap than =o)))) -- Robert Ramiega | ro...@pl... IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-09-11 22:56:29
|
Hi, > Log message: > more mm fixes I really hope I did find now everything, a working kernel so far was very much depending on memory layout and phase of the moon. There is an issue left with ioremap, but nothing serious (the p_mapped_by_bats should also check the flags). BTW parport_amiga should be fixed now too, at least I can load it, but I don't know if it does anything useful. Probably on wednesday I'm going to update to test8 and break everything again. :) bye, Roman |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@us...> - 2000-09-11 22:37:50
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.3 Repository: 2.3/drivers/parport/ Changes by: zi...@sl.... 00/09/11 15:37:49 Modified files: 2.3/drivers/parport/: parport_amiga.c Log message: fixed and cleaned up init function |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@us...> - 2000-09-11 21:53:21
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.3 Repository: 2.3/include/linux/ Changes by: zi...@sl.... 00/09/11 14:53:20 Modified files: 2.3/arch/ppc/amiga/: config.c 2.3/drivers/ide/: gayle.c 2.3/drivers/zorro/: zorro.c 2.3/include/linux/: zorro.h Log message: real __init fixes |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@us...> - 2000-09-11 21:52:13
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus Module name: 2.3 Repository: 2.3/arch/ppc/mm/ Changes by: zi...@sl.... 00/09/11 14:52:12 Modified files: 2.3/arch/ppc/mm/: init.c Log message: more mm fixes |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-09-11 16:45:32
|
hi, Would it be possible to integrate the BadRAM system http://home.zonnet.nl/vanrein/badram/ with LinuxAPUS kernel? This would allow users of APUS to get cheap/free memory SIMMs to use with their system (faulty SIMMs invariably get thrown away...this nifty system gives SIMMs a new life! Anyone here know how well this could be integrated...x86 architecture being variably different with its memory allocation and MMU details alan |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-09-11 15:17:48
|
hi, > These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out > :) well, the FAQ exists....but the Docs are mixed in with it in ways. A FAQ should be just a FAQ, all the docs should be in a nice indexable document. ...but, as said before, this'll need a lot of working on alan |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-09-11 14:16:15
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > > > could some people please download or read the docs and we can then > > > startup a discussion of changes to be made/added to this.... > > > > One thing that bothers me is that both the 'Kernels' & 'Boothack' and > > 'Docs' & 'FAQ" links point to the same location. > > do they? ouch. the kernel should point to the modules page, as should the > boothack really. They both do now, I've changed this. > the FAQ should point to the documents that we currently have, and the docs > should point ot a new page that cotains documents about other bits....info > about the bootstrap/kernels etc for example. These both point to the FAQ currently, that's what I was trying to point out :) Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project |
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
