Menu
▾
▴
linux-apus-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(210) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(167) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(218) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(71) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(179) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Nicholai B. <nic...@ch...> - 2000-05-27 10:48:56
|
Hello Michel Den 27-Maj-00, skrev Michel Dänzer: MD> Nicholai Benalal wrote: MD> MD>> Just checked this myself and we need to update the 2.3 tree in order to MD>> use the new bootstrap. MD> MD> Can you do it? I'll do it when I find some time. Only 4 days left to my exam. MD> MD> What bootstrap is needed for the current 2.3? MD> MD> Something old that uses the old hacky way to communicate powerup_pci_present to the kernel. Probably the last bootstrap from 1999. /Nicholai |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-27 10:39:35
|
Roman Zippel wrote: > Everything is committed now, I also fixed some import errors (no core dir, > keyword substitution (although I think I missed a though)). You mean net/core? I just noticed that it's missing in the 2.2 tree as well... Can you imagine how it got lost in the import? > I didn't create any branch, but I think it won't be neccesary anymore for > 2.3. For 2.4 and later we can still discuss how to organize the repository. Right. > For 2.3 I can keep it uptodate with the bitkeeper tree (except someone > else wants to do it...). Please do it, thanks. Michel -- It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT. ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-27 10:04:00
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > what does it mean if you just drop back to your shell after issuing the > > cvs login > > command? It means you're logged in anonymously and can check out whatever you like. Michel -- Here I am! Now what are your other two wishes? ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-27 10:02:03
|
Nicholai Benalal wrote: > Just checked this myself and we need to update the 2.3 tree in order to use > the new bootstrap. Can you do it? What bootstrap is needed for the current 2.3? Michel -- There's no place like ~ ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Nicholai B. <nic...@ch...> - 2000-05-27 09:56:53
|
Hello Nicholai Den 27-Maj-00, skrev Nicholai Benalal: NB> Hello Roman NB> NB> I just want to make sure that we don't have to use different bootstraps NB> for 2.2 and 2.3. NB> Just checked this myself and we need to update the 2.3 tree in order to use the new bootstrap. /Nicholai |
|
From: Ken T. <ke...@we...> - 2000-05-26 23:47:21
|
Hello, Might be getting ahead of myself here but the patch to /arch/ppc/kernel/apus_setup.c posted recently by Nicholai is missing from the 2.2 tree on sourceforge. ken |
|
From: Nicholai B. <nic...@ch...> - 2000-05-26 22:31:03
|
Hello Roman Den 26-Maj-00, skrev Roman Zippel: RZ> Hi, RZ> RZ>> Well, i handled the 2.2.10 tree up to now. I think we will have to wait RZ>> until we have the cvs tree up at sourceforge. will do it today, i RZ>> think, so please send me a patfch or something ... RZ> RZ> Ok, here is a patch for the bitkeeper source, it's quite small, most of RZ> the needed changes are already there and a few things might be missing RZ> from Jes' last patch (like kgdb). RZ> The Ariadne2 driver isn't working yet, but I hadn't enough time to look RZ> into this yesterday and some other things need to be cleaned up... RZ> RZ> bye, Roman RZ> RZ> diff -Nur -X apus_nodiff linuxppc_2_3/Makefile linux-apus/Makefile RZ> --- linuxppc_2_3/Makefile Wed May 24 08:36:35 2000 RZ> +++ linux-apus/Makefile Thu May 25 21:39:32 2000 RZ> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ RZ> RZ> KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION) RZ> Excuse me for my ignorance, but where is/should the bootinfo version be set? Wouldn't it be possible to increase the bootinfo major with the boothack patch that you posted some time ago? Also, is the 2.3 tree patched to use the bootinfo fields that I added for 2.2.10 (b/cvision and bppc+ scsi)? As a matter of fact the best thing would be to do this in the kernel but right now we don't know how... I just want to make sure that we don't have to use different bootstraps for 2.2 and 2.3. Friendly, Nicholai |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-05-26 20:29:51
|
Hi, Everything is committed now, I also fixed some import errors (no core dir, keyword substitution (although I think I missed a though)). I didn't create any branch, but I think it won't be neccesary anymore for 2.3. For 2.4 and later we can still discuss how to organize the repository. For 2.3 I can keep it uptodate with the bitkeeper tree (except someone else wants to do it...). bye, Roman |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-05-26 13:51:57
|
hi, what does it mean if you just drop back to your shell after issuing the cvs login command? I'm trying on a different machine with direct all-port net access and my CVSROOT is set correctly to :pserver:etcetc this is the same behaviour as my machine at home...which led me to ask about passwords ;-) > This one i know, just use the :ext: method and you developper login and > password, should work, ... sorry, but whats the syntax for this? I've tried a few combos...and dumped back to shell is all i get after password prompt/answer alan |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-05-26 12:05:06
|
Hi, > > I can do both, just tell me what you prefer, but the diff to the bitkeeper > > tree will be larger (but I can omit nonrelevant changes like added/removed > > files in non-m68k/ppc dirs). > > I'd say commit it. I think someone with a faster connection should do this (I'm still checking out...) I've put to files into incoming, one diff against the bitkeeper tree and one against the native tree. bye, Roman |
|
From: Nicholai B. <nic...@ch...> - 2000-05-26 11:11:36
|
Hello Alan Den 26-Maj-00, skrev Alan Buxey: AB> hi, AB> AB>>> /hom/groups/linux-apus/ftp only seems to have the stuff dragged from AB>>> sunsite, do i hav to follow the "upload then select file and submit" AB>>> via the webpage front-end? AB>> AB>> Exactly. AB> AB> okay. I've now removed the old apus-noscsi-blahblah kernel from the AB> ftp://linux-apus/contrib directory - this will stop a few problem AB> emailas each week. AB> AB> can we also delete the older boothack_wup_detect trials from the contrib AB> directory now? (i'll do this if the answer is yes) AB> yes /Nicholai |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-05-26 11:07:11
|
hi, > > /hom/groups/linux-apus/ftp only seems to have the stuff dragged from > > sunsite, do i hav to follow the "upload then select file and submit" > > via the webpage front-end? > > Exactly. okay. I've now removed the old apus-noscsi-blahblah kernel from the ftp://linux-apus/contrib directory - this will stop a few problem emailas each week. can we also delete the older boothack_wup_detect trials from the contrib directory now? (i'll do this if the answer is yes) alan |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-26 10:01:11
|
Roman Zippel wrote: > > Which one will you do ? provide the patch, or commit the patch ? > > I can do both, just tell me what you prefer, but the diff to the bitkeeper > tree will be larger (but I can omit nonrelevant changes like added/removed > files in non-m68k/ppc dirs). I'd say commit it. > > i am checkin out the 2.3 tree, but it seems to be quite slow, ... > > I'm noticing that too. :) > Anyway, which kernel do we take as base kernel? Most relevant are in the > main tree, but the bitkeeper tree is still more uptodate for ppc stuff. On > the other hand creating a release would be quite easy with the main tree. > Keeping both in there is possible too, but creates quite some work. If someone can keep the bitkeeper tree up to date, I think having that one would be better. As Jesper pointed out, making diffs to the native tree is easy. Michel -- It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT. ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Alan B. <al...@ms...> - 2000-05-26 09:51:49
|
hi, > This one i know, just use the :ext: method and you developper login and > password, should work, ... argh! Its almost as bad as sendmail... $ <> %@ $$ $1 $2 <> *$* ..nah, its not that bad come to think of it 8-) alan |
|
From: <fp...@zu...> - 2000-05-26 09:48:54
|
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:54:40AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > i am checkin out the 2.3 tree, but it seems to be quite slow, ... I find it quite fast, actually. It seems to depend on your network connection. -- Frank Petzold, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Säumerstrasse 4, CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland, Tel. +41-1-724-84-42 Fax. +41-1-724-89-56 Business email: fp...@zu... Private email: pe...@he... The opinions expressed here are mine and not necessarily those of IBM. |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-05-26 09:41:16
|
Hi, > Which one will you do ? provide the patch, or commit the patch ? I can do both, just tell me what you prefer, but the diff to the bitkeeper tree will be larger (but I can omit nonrelevant changes like added/removed files in non-m68k/ppc dirs). > i am checkin out the 2.3 tree, but it seems to be quite slow, ... I'm noticing that too. :) Anyway, which kernel do we take as base kernel? Most relevant are in the main tree, but the bitkeeper tree is still more uptodate for ppc stuff. On the other hand creating a release would be quite easy with the main tree. Keeping both in there is possible too, but creates quite some work. bye, Roman |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-05-26 08:55:08
|
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:34:23AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was thinking about the latter. If there's something in Jesper's latest stuff > > > that we can't miss, it won't be hard to put it in again I guess. > > > > Roman, could you send me (or upload to sourceforge) a native patch of your > > work ? > > I can do that, in the meantime I get the 2.3 CVS tree. Which one will you do ? provide the patch, or commit the patch ? i am checkin out the 2.3 tree, but it seems to be quite slow, ... Friendly, Svne LUTHER |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-26 08:53:21
|
Alan Buxey wrote: > by the way...anonymous CVS - whats the usual password...i tried using > sourceforge pserver:anonymous system and cant login. Just press enter for the password. This is described very well on the project CVS repository page. > also, where are the module files (ie kernel and bootstrap) held on the > system... They're on download.sourceforge.net, don't think we have direct access there... > /hom/groups/linux-apus/ftp only seems to have the stuff dragged from > sunsite, do i hav to follow the "upload then select file and submit" > via the webpage front-end? Exactly. Michel -- True programmers never die, they just branch to an odd address. ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@fh...> - 2000-05-26 08:45:11
|
Hi, > > I was thinking about the latter. If there's something in Jesper's latest stuff > > that we can't miss, it won't be hard to put it in again I guess. > > Roman, could you send me (or upload to sourceforge) a native patch of your > work ? I can do that, in the meantime I get the 2.3 CVS tree. bye, Roman |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-05-26 08:43:09
|
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:24:58AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > Something came to my mind at home yesterday: Would importing the '.' > > > module work? > > > > Don't know, ... > > > > lets try it > > Negative :( Thought so, ... > It still takes the repository files as working files (tried with Jesper's doc > module). > > Okay Sven, will you contact someone at sourceforge? I just contacted the sourceforge support team, request id is 102062. lets give them time to go over that, ... if not we can always contact the sourceforge team directly, ... Friendly, Sven LUTHER |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-26 08:26:55
|
Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Something came to my mind at home yesterday: Would importing the '.' > > module work? > > Don't know, ... > > lets try it Negative :( It still takes the repository files as working files (tried with Jesper's doc module). Okay Sven, will you contact someone at sourceforge? Michel -- There's no place like ~ ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-26 08:13:52
|
Roman Zippel wrote: > Ok, here is a patch for the bitkeeper source, it's quite small, most of > the needed changes are already there and a few things might be missing > from Jes' last patch (like kgdb). Can you commit the code yourself or submit a patch against the kernel.org tree? Michel -- Press every key to continue. ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-05-26 08:12:27
|
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:07:44AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > that is native 2.3.99-pre8, as in ftp.kernel.org, isn't it ? > > Yep. > > > we will need to apply the latest 2.3 patch to it, or maybe directly the > > patch with Roman's stuff ? > > I was thinking about the latter. If there's something in Jesper's latest stuff > that we can't miss, it won't be hard to put it in again I guess. Roman, could you send me (or upload to sourceforge) a native patch of your work ? I have no bitkeeper tree to work with. > > > If possible, we can still import Jesper's modules for the history. > > > > Yes, we can still do that, ... > > > > Will try contacting someone at sourceforge for it, ... > > Something came to my mind at home yesterday: Would importing the '.' module > work? Don't know, ... lets try it Friendly, Sven LUTHER |
|
From: Michel <dae...@st...> - 2000-05-26 08:09:37
|
Sven LUTHER wrote: > that is native 2.3.99-pre8, as in ftp.kernel.org, isn't it ? Yep. > we will need to apply the latest 2.3 patch to it, or maybe directly the > patch with Roman's stuff ? I was thinking about the latter. If there's something in Jesper's latest stuff that we can't miss, it won't be hard to put it in again I guess. > > If possible, we can still import Jesper's modules for the history. > > Yes, we can still do that, ... > > Will try contacting someone at sourceforge for it, ... Something came to my mind at home yesterday: Would importing the '.' module work? Michel -- The computer revolution is over. The computers won. ______________________________________________________________________________ Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS |
|
From: Sven L. <lu...@dp...> - 2000-05-26 08:05:33
|
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > I have some spare time now, so if you give me instructions I'll set up > > > > boothack (?), 2.2.10 and (at least native) 2.3.99pre8 branches (?) so we > > > can get this thing going. > > > > > > Do we need branches? As much as I love to have different versions in a > > > local cvs repository, but to do it over a possibly slow link? > > > > Well, yes, you only need to checkout whatever branch you feel like you need. > > I saw yesterday that Jesper had two modules for 2.2 and 2.3 and so I imported > two trees: Ok, nice, ... > 2.2 (aliases: linux-apus-2.2, stable) has Sven's latest diff applied > > 2.3 (linux-apus-2.3, unstable) is the native 2.3.99-pre8. Roman, please commit > your code there. that is native 2.3.99-pre8, as in ftp.kernel.org, isn't it ? we will need to apply the latest 2.3 patch to it, or maybe directly the patch with Roman's stuff ? > I posted an announcement to this list about it yesterday, but unfortunately I > made a typo in the address, and I didn't notice because the incoming mail > server here was down. > > If possible, we can still import Jesper's modules for the history. Yes, we can still do that, ... Will try contacting someone at sourceforge for it, ... Friendly, Sven LUTHER |
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
