Menu
▾
▴
linux-apus-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(210) |
Jun
(169) |
Jul
(167) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(218) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(71) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(179) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <aw...@sw...> - 2003-07-31 22:12:52
|
Hi Marek Am Donnerstag, 31.07.03, um 11:06 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Marek Szyprowski: > Hello Geert > > On 30.07.03, you wrote: > > >>>> Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at >>>> dmasound_init+908c/c0a0. >>> But what this exactly means? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I >>> have >>> never used any debuging stuff other than printf()/printk()... >> dmasound_core calls the low-level chipset-specific routines through >> function pointers. If one of them is not set up, it will jump to >> address >> 0, causing a crash. > > Today I found that also the built-in parranel port makes kernel oopses. FWIW, back in the days I tried to use the parport, I've got an endless sequence of irq_unbalanced(..) messages, until I killed the task which was trying to access the parport (i.e. lpr). This was with 2.4.17 on a A4000. But it did never oops when using the parport! > So > the above discussion is pointless, because the main problem lies in the > interrupt code, not in drivers... Do you remember when the problems > with > interrupts started? So maybe with 2.4.17 it was at least still half working. -- Best wishes, Andi |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-31 08:12:31
|
Hello Geert On 30.07.03, you wrote: >>> Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at >>> dmasound_init+908c/c0a0. >> But what this exactly means? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I have >> never used any debuging stuff other than printf()/printk()... > dmasound_core calls the low-level chipset-specific routines through > function pointers. If one of them is not set up, it will jump to address > 0, causing a crash. Today I found that also the built-in parranel port makes kernel oopses. So the above discussion is pointless, because the main problem lies in the interrupt code, not in drivers... Do you remember when the problems with interrupts started? Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-30 14:10:35
|
Hello Geert On 30.07.03, you wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> On 30.07.03, you wrote: >>> Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at >>> dmasound_init+908c/c0a0. >> But what this exactly means? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I have >> never used any debuging stuff other than printf()/printk()... > dmasound_core calls the low-level chipset-specific routines through > function pointers. If one of them is not set up, it will jump to address > 0, causing a crash. Ok. So why the same code did not crashed on kernel 2.4.18? Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-07-30 13:42:00
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 30.07.03, you wrote:
> > Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at
> > dmasound_init+908c/c0a0.
>
> But what this exactly means? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I have never
> used any debuging stuff other than printf()/printk()...
dmasound_core calls the low-level chipset-specific routines through function
pointers. If one of them is not set up, it will jump to address 0, causing a
crash.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-30 12:27:46
|
Hello Piotr
On 30.07.03, you wrote:
>> why tilda ('~') key doesn't work any more. I haven't checked the built-in
> I have kernel from cvs where '~' doesn't work. Last time I installed
> xwindows, and under X tilda works ok, but shift doesn't work...
Have you added the option "CustomKeycodes" to the keyboard section in
XF86Config-4?
Regards
--
Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... ..
...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........
........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............
|
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-30 12:25:18
|
Hello a.l...@lb... On 30.07.03, you wrote: >> I attached both, alhough I can't read anything intresting from them. > looks like another interupt handler problem...as was issue with IDE. > interupt handler not handling. > are you running X at the time? No, I don't. I use a pure text console with only a few very important daemons running (syslog, klog, cron, at, lpd...). Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-30 12:22:51
|
Hello Geert On 30.07.03, you wrote: > Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at > dmasound_init+908c/c0a0. But what this exactly means? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I have never used any debuging stuff other than printf()/printk()... Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: <du...@ds...> - 2003-07-30 10:05:01
|
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>why tilda ('~') key doesn't work any more. I haven't checked the built-in
>
I have kernel from cvs where '~' doesn't work. Last time I installed
xwindows, and under X tilda works ok, but shift doesn't work...
dus
|
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-07-30 09:37:50
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 29.07.03, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> BTW: do you have any ideas why DMA sound driver makes kernel ops (and
> >> then panic: "attempt to kill interrupt handler")?
>
> > No, I don't. I'll have to try it on my (m68k) A4000...
>
> > Do you have a crash dump? That would help a lot...
>
> You mean the oops log and its trace?
>
> I attached both, alhough I can't read anything intresting from them.
Looks like a function call through a NULL pointer at dmasound_init+908c/c0a0.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-29 23:18:06
|
Hello Geert On 29.07.03, you wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> BTW: do you have any ideas why DMA sound driver makes kernel ops (and >> then panic: "attempt to kill interrupt handler")? > No, I don't. I'll have to try it on my (m68k) A4000... > Do you have a crash dump? That would help a lot... You mean the oops log and its trace? I attached both, alhough I can't read anything intresting from them. I even added a printk with the function name in every function in dmasound_core.c and dmasound_paula.c, but this was a really bad idea - kernel fell into a infinite loop... I attached a snipped dmesg from this experiment. Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-07-29 20:59:25
|
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> BTW: do you have any ideas why DMA sound driver makes kernel ops (and then
> panic: "attempt to kill interrupt handler")?
No, I don't. I'll have to try it on my (m68k) A4000...
Do you have a crash dump? That would help a lot...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-29 20:28:10
|
Hello Geert On 29.07.03, you wrote: >>> I don't remeber how it works in previous version, but would be funny >>> if mixer interface (/dev/mixer) with only one control (master volume) >>> can be used. >> It would be hard to do it (IMHO), because AmigaDMA sound does not support >> hardware control of volume... > Amiga DMA sound does support hardware control of the volume, through the > custom.aud[].audvol registers. That's why I wrote "IMHO". Nobody is perfect... ;) BTW: do you have any ideas why DMA sound driver makes kernel ops (and then panic: "attempt to kill interrupt handler")? Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-07-29 18:37:30
|
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 28.07.03, you wrote:
> > I don't remeber how it works in previous version, but would be funny
> > if mixer interface (/dev/mixer) with only one control (master volume)
> > can be used.
>
> It would be hard to do it (IMHO), because AmigaDMA sound does not support
> hardware control of volume...
Amiga DMA sound does support hardware control of the volume, through the
custom.aud[].audvol registers.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li...
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
|
From: Ondrej Z. <ond...@ap...> - 2003-07-29 16:45:56
|
Michel D=C3=A4nzer napsal(a): >>> As for the subject tags, those can be added or filtered out by=20 >>> everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? >> No tags, please. Think of cross posts, soon you'll have a subject >> line full of funny tags... > My concern exactly. :) Hm, I didn't expect any other response :-/ so I can live with it... Let's go to deep kernel... 1) I'v got sometimes this kernel message. eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=3D0x1 imr=3D0x0. It appear in 2.2.10 and 2.4.21 too. The message only appear and continue the working. 2) I discover the small typos in amijoy.c source. Diff attached. --=20 Ondrej Zima <ami...@vo...> Member of Czech ATO - Amiga Translators Organization |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-29 15:12:36
|
Hello a.l...@lb... On 29.07.03, you wrote: >> I think we sould wait one week more before realasing 2.4.21pre1. In next >> few > ..thats why i said 'but lets give it some testing' I'd rather have this > working fine...than work to a dealine and release another kernel with > issues. OK. Today I got a message from my travel agency: my hollidays are canceled :( Because of that I will have less time to debug the kernel in the next few days - I will be simply looking for intresting LastMinute offers... > serial needs work on all the other devices too which dont work since the > 2.2 -> 2.4 migration. I have the infos but these character devices are a > little too much for me. But built-in serial port driver worked quite well in 2.4.17. Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-29 15:07:20
|
Hello a.l...@lb... On 29.07.03, you wrote: >> I think we sould wait one week more before realasing 2.4.21pre1. In next >> few > ..thats why i said 'but lets give it some testing' I'd rather have this > working fine...than work to a dealine and release another kernel with > issues. OK. Today I got a message from my travel agency: my hollidays are canceled :( Because of that I will have less time to debug the kernel in the next few days - I will be simply looking for intresting LastMinute offers... > serial needs work on all the other devices too which dont work since the > 2.2 -> 2.4 migration. I have the infos but these character devices are a > little too much for me. But built-in serial port driver worked quite well in 2.4.17. Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
|
From: Michel <mi...@da...> - 2003-07-29 13:33:17
|
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:46, Andreas Wüst wrote: > > Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 17:29 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 17:18, Andreas Wüst wrote: > >> > >> Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 16:22 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel > >> Dänzer: > >> > >>> As for the subject tags, those can be added or filtered out by > >>> everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? :) > >> > >> I guess filtering on "X-Been-There:" is enough, no? > > > > Absolutely; the tags aren't necessary (or even very useful) for > > filtering. The question is: 'What do you want the subject to look like > > by default?' :) > > As crufty as possible, no? ;) > > Well, nonetheless, I guess there are two valid points for subject tags, > namely if people can only read their mail via webmail, where they have > no filtering. It would add for clarity a lot. And, if the subject > rewriting supports complex expressions with replacement and so on, i.e. > you could filter out doubled tags, doubled Re's etc. But no idea if > this is possible. I guess sourceforge doesn't want to add this load to > their mailservers. AFAIK, this is a mailman feature which simply checks if the subject contains the given text and prepends it if it doesn't. It gets really ugly really quickly. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer |
|
From: <aw...@sw...> - 2003-07-29 11:42:39
|
Hi Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 17:29 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel D=E4nzer:= > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 17:18, Andreas W=FCst wrote: >> >> Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 16:22 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel=20 >> D=E4nzer: >> >>> As for the subject tags, those can be added or filtered out by >>> everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? :) >> >> I guess filtering on "X-Been-There:" is enough, no? > > Absolutely; the tags aren't necessary (or even very useful) for > filtering. The question is: 'What do you want the subject to look like > by default?' :) As crufty as possible, no? ;) Well, nonetheless, I guess there are two valid points for subject tags,=20= namely if people can only read their mail via webmail, where they have=20= no filtering. It would add for clarity a lot. And, if the subject=20 rewriting supports complex expressions with replacement and so on, i.e.=20= you could filter out doubled tags, doubled Re's etc. But no idea if=20 this is possible. I guess sourceforge doesn't want to add this load to=20= their mailservers. --=20 Best wishes, Andi= |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-29 09:01:13
|
Hello a.l...@lb...
On 29.07.03, you wrote:
> I've put in an entry for the FAQ about our current status. I think we
> should hopefully have a nice 2.4.21pre1 out for the weekend.. but lets
> give it some testing before we do. we need this new kernel to clear up
> many of the post 2.4.13 issues that people have had. get things back
> happily running.
I think we sould wait one week more before realasing 2.4.21pre1. In next few
day/nights I will try to figure why DMA Sound driver crashes the kernel and
why tilda ('~') key doesn't work any more. I haven't checked the built-in
serial port support, but I think it is also broken (as it was in 2.4.18).
However 2.4.21 kernel is more stable than 2.4.18. I haven't seen any seg
fault from networking software (this happened very often on 2.4.18).
Regards
--
Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... ..
...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........
........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............
|
|
From: Marek S. <mar...@us...> - 2003-07-28 21:34:51
|
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/linux-apus
Module name: 2.3
Repository: 2.3/arch/ppc/platforms/
Changes by: march123@sc8-pr-cvs1. 03/07/28 14:34:50
Log message:
Fix resource allocation bug in Permedia2 PCI support
Modified files:
2.3/arch/ppc/platforms/:
apus_pci.c
Revision Changes Path
1.2 +2 -5 2.3/arch/ppc/platforms/apus_pci.c
|
|
From: Michel <mi...@da...> - 2003-07-28 21:34:05
|
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 22:22, Roman Zippel wrote: > > "Michel Dänzer" wrote: > > > As for the subject tags, those can be added or > > filtered out by everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? > > No tags, please. Think of cross posts, soon you'll have a subject line > full of funny tags... My concern exactly. :) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer |
|
From: Roman Z. <zi...@li...> - 2003-07-28 20:50:35
|
Hi, "Michel Dänzer" wrote: > As for the subject tags, those can be added or > filtered out by everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? No tags, please. Think of cross posts, soon you'll have a subject line full of funny tags... bye, Roman |
|
From: Michel <mi...@da...> - 2003-07-28 15:29:42
|
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 17:18, Andreas Wüst wrote: > > Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 16:22 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > > As for the subject tags, those can be added or filtered out by > > everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. Opinions? :) > > I guess filtering on "X-Been-There:" is enough, no? Absolutely; the tags aren't necessary (or even very useful) for filtering. The question is: 'What do you want the subject to look like by default?' :) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer |
|
From: <aw...@sw...> - 2003-07-28 15:14:01
|
Hi Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 16:22 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel D=E4nzer:= > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:24, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: >> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:17, Ondrej Zima wrote: >>> >>> BTW: can be used some more sofisticated mailing-list options? In >>> message subject would be the prefix as [APUS-dev] or [APUS-user] and >>> in reply-to would be the lin...@li... or >>> lin...@li.... It prevent to posting only to >>> private mail. >> >> Definitely not, [...] > > Let me clarify this. I'll never clobber the Reply-To header on any = list > I administrate, unless there's a very compelling reason which = outweighs > the disadvantages. As for the subject tags, those can be added or > filtered out by everyone, so I guess the majority wins there. = Opinions? > :) I guess filtering on "X-Been-There:" is enough, no? --=20 Best wishes, Andi= |
|
From: Marek S. <ma...@st...> - 2003-07-28 15:11:04
|
Hello Ondrej On 28.07.03, you wrote: > Hi all, > I'v compiled the 2.4.21 kernel myself and ... great, it works. Yes, I > must use the patch suplied by Marek for BVision working. I have > attached the dmesg output. Which one have You used? Changin arch/ppc/platforms/apus_pci.c or arch/ppc/kernel/pci.c? > In the output is this message: > "Memory resource not set for host bridge 0" > Is this right? Yes. This is correct. > And as you can see, the apne driver works for me :-))) GREAT. Thanks. > Some more questions: > 1) I have installed the dmasound_paula and try to play some mp3 files. > The result is kernel panic with 60 seconds delay to reboot. I didn't > make the debug output so I cant send it. Is there some > misfunctionalities in Amiga DMA sound driver? In Gnome sesion, I have > always the message the mixer cannot be opened. Today I also noticed that. :( AmigaDMA sound seems to be misfunctional now. One more bug to trace... Regards -- Marek Szyprowski .. GG:2309080 .. mailto:ma...@am... .. ...... happy AmigaOS, MacOS and Debian/Linux user ........ ........... http://march.home.staszic.waw.pl/ ............ |
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
