From: Josh W. <jo...@hi...> - 2002-02-21 23:45:40
|
At 16:27 on 02/21/2002 EST, "Will Coleda" <wc...@in...> wrote: > Will Coleda wrote: > > So, my plan is to take RPI, get rid of all the wierd code (like the /how > > code that was special cased for a particular user on RPI that I pulled > > today), pull all the updates from devCore that are stable enough (or > > small enough) to save, and then archive that devCore. > > Speaking of which, the following people have claimed bugs on jitterbug: > > http://www.centauri.org/cgi-bin/lily > > wilmesj: #81, #84, #336, #395 81 is basically a reminder to go back and remove some code which isn't used any more. I am pretty sure it's safe to do so at this point, since I think selfEventMsg has been in use @ rpi for a while now, and nobody's complained. Give me a stable devcore and i'd be happy to make the change and close the case. 84, #336, and #395 i hand't done anything on, so i've un-claimed them and moved them back to "open". --Josh > newbeb: #52, #177, #262 > gad: #103, #376 > coke: [list elided] > albert: #223, #396, #397 > > Can I get a status report on these bugs? > > Also, can we get stroke (cc'd on this message) a jitterbug account, as > he's volunteered to take care of the help system? > > _______________________________________________ > lilycore-dev mailing list > lil...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lilycore-dev |