Thread: [Lily4jedit-devel] what-beat

Brought to you by: fodber

lily4jedit-devel

[Lily4jedit-devel] what-beat

From: Fodor B. <fod...@fr...> - 2004-11-25 22:37:29

Hello, the new what-beat macro is in CVS now. It works not only after |, 
and also with notes that have their length from previous measures:

c4 c d8 e f g | f g e d c4 d4 |

So perhaps a menu item could be added, to make it able to be set to a 
shortcut.

Bert

Re: [Lily4jedit-devel] what-beat

From: Joshua K. <jos...@gm...> - 2004-11-30 00:59:54

Cool...

But here's small bug. When you enter | after | without any notes in
between, this error will show

java.util.NoSuchElementException
	at lilytool.macrohelp.NoteIterator.next(NoteIterator.java:171)

What do you think if we are able to see the beat on any note rather
than at the barline?
Will it be easier to read the beat in numbers rather than fraction,
eg. Beat 1, beat 2, beat 3?

Joshua

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:37:14 +0100, Fodor Bertalan
<fod...@fr...> wrote:
> Hello, the new what-beat macro is in CVS now. It works not only after |,
> and also with notes that have their length from previous measures:
> 
> c4 c d8 e f g | f g e d c4 d4 |
> 
> So perhaps a menu item could be added, to make it able to be set to a
> shortcut.
> 
> Bert
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Lily4jedit-devel mailing list
> Lil...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lily4jedit-devel
>

Re: [Lily4jedit-devel] what-beat

From: Bertalan F. <fo...@fr...> - 2004-11-30 07:41:21

Joshua Koo wrote:

>Cool...
>
>But here's small bug. When you enter | after | without any notes in
>between, this error will show
>
>java.util.NoSuchElementException
>	at lilytool.macrohelp.NoteIterator.next(NoteIterator.java:171)
>
>  
>
Ok, one more feature missing. This exception is thrown from the 
constructor, if I remember clearly. Thanks, I will fix it.

>What do you think if we are able to see the beat on any note rather
>than at the barline?
>Will it be easier to read the beat in numbers rather than fraction,
>eg. Beat 1, beat 2, beat 3?
>  
>
No, I don't think so. In a 12/8 score, what does Beat 1 mean? I'd even 
like to be consistent with the emacs what-beat.

Bert