Re: [pLog-General] Problems, anyone?
Brought to you by:
jondaley
From: Oscar R. <os...@re...> - 2004-02-16 17:27:46
|
That would be great :) But I somehow understood that the code you wrote was already capable of blocking subnets... As far as I understood, wouldn't this: "213.44.12.33/16" block all the "214.44.0.0" subnets? Or am I missing something? :o) Oscar On 16 Feb 2004, at 19:15, Brian M Rupe wrote: > I need to sit down and discuss the IP filtering section with you at > some point. You have it working for single address blocking, but we > need to setup a way to do IP range blocking via subnets.... > > And I need to get off my butt and write the explainations for those > screens and stuff. :) > > > Oscar Renalias wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I was wondering if anybody else has found any big problem so far with >> the current cvs version. I am thinking about finishing with the help >> texts sometime this week, hopefully, and perhaps release a beta >> version so that we can get more people testing it... but I don't want >> to release anything half-baked. >> >> So far the bayesian filter already works, Daniel did some great work >> and thanks to him pLog does not need 'magic_quotes_gpc' set to 'true' >> anymore, Nick has provided a great new theme (a couple of things >> missing yet, but that's it) and the other features are already there. >> Everything's almost ready but please let me know if there's any >> problem. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > pLog-General mailing list > pLo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plog-general > |