Re: [libxml++] unicode support

[Christophe de V. <cde...@al...>]

Hi,

As far as the orientation the thread took, I'll just say that I quite agree=
=20
with Murray, but don't want to feed the troll.

Le Vendredi 7 F=E9vrier 2003 23:10, Stefan Seefeld a =E9crit :
> The full C++ code now lives in a set of headers. There
> was just not enough code independent of the actual
> character type to be put into .cc files.

As far as this particular point, what I personnaly do with templated class =
is=20
that I still separate declaration and implementation into a .h and a .cc/.c=
pp=20
file.
Then I include the .cc/.cpp in the .h file so the templated implementation =
is=20
still visible by user code.
This make header much more clean and readable, and if one day we have the=20
chance to have a c++ compiler which support the 'export' keyword, then=20
adaptation will be as easy as comment 1 line of code.

This is to say that even if the unicode compliance of libxml++ means fully=
=20
templated classes, this won't mean .cc files suppression, and that a patch =
is=20
more than welcome...

Best regards,

Christophe