From: Chong K. X. <des...@ph...> - 2006-04-02 20:18:34
|
I somewhat admire synap's patience in the response he made. It's clear that you're the one who has never thought about the issue, nor have experience dealing with parallel installable libraries. But apparently, that didn't stop you from being vociferous. Next time, don't assume we're idiots. You can question nicely if you think we made a mistake. On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 08:31 +0200, salsaman wrote: > Hi, > I am testing libvisual 0.4.0. First thing I noticed is there is some=20 > kind of madness with pkg-config. >=20 > Now look, the idea of pkg-config is to make a package and its flags easy=20 > to find. It makes sense then to have livisual.pc. > It does not make any sense to have libvisual-<version>.pc >=20 > that is what pkg-config --modversion is for - to retrieve the pakage=20 > version ! >=20 > What justification is there for having libvisual-<version>.pc ? It's=20 > hardly likely that a user would want to have multiple versions of=20 > libvisual on their system. >=20 > Please consider moving back to libvisual.pc >=20 >=20 > Salsaman > http://lives.sourceforge.net >=20 --=20 Chong Kai Xiong (Descender) GPG public key: 1024D/83EC297C Key fingerprint =3D 51D6 1C5F 36C9 4428 6933 5239 6A45 502B 83EC 297C |