From: salsaman <sal...@xs...> - 2006-03-26 06:17:39
|
Hi, I am testing libvisual 0.4.0. First thing I noticed is there is some kind of madness with pkg-config. Now look, the idea of pkg-config is to make a package and its flags easy to find. It makes sense then to have livisual.pc. It does not make any sense to have libvisual-<version>.pc that is what pkg-config --modversion is for - to retrieve the pakage version ! What justification is there for having libvisual-<version>.pc ? It's hardly likely that a user would want to have multiple versions of libvisual on their system. Please consider moving back to libvisual.pc Also this version number madness has continued into the libraries, after installing 0.4.0 over 0.2.0 here is the mess I ended up with in /usr/lib: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 890 Mar 26 07:54 /usr/lib/libvisual-0.4.la* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Mar 26 07:54 /usr/lib/libvisual-0.4.so-> libvisual-0.4.so.0.0.0* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Mar 26 07:54 /usr/lib/libvisual-0.4.so.0 -> libvisual-0.4.so.0.0.0* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 689958 Mar 26 07:54 /usr/lib/libvisual-0.4.so.0.0.0* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 868 Feb 1 21:45 /usr/lib/libvisual.la* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Feb 1 21:45 /usr/lib/libvisual.so -> libvisual.so.0.0.0* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Mar 20 11:49 /usr/lib/libvisual.so.0 -> libvisual.so.0.0.0* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 135496 Aug 22 2005 /usr/lib/libvisual.so.0.0.0* More to follow... Salsaman http://lives.sourceforge.net |