From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2005-02-01 08:45:57
|
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 05:16 +0000, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On 01/31/2005 06:10:46 PM, Dennis Smit wrote: > > Heya fellahs, > > > > Major changes went into libvisual, some might be unstable, even > > completely broken. > > > > I've put online libvisual 0.2.0pre1, PLEASE test this release, report > > if it works, and especially if it does NOT work! > > Fedora Core 3 > > uninstalled previous libvisual stuff completely > > compiled libvisual and then libvisual-plugins and then libvisual-xmms > > Build methos was via rpm > > During build of libvisual-plugins, the make install threw all the > plugins into > > %buildroot/usr/lib > > the .la files did have correct path ( /usr/lib/libvisual/whatever/ ) > but that's not where they were installed (it is in the stable version) I don't have much experience with building rpm packages, however using the .spec file, this should be solved ? Or, what should I do with the spec file, is it advisible to include it in the CVS development tree ? > However - when I had the spec file manually create the directorys and > move the plugins - they work fine with the xmms-plugin > > Note on the xmms plugin - when it starts from cli, it complains that it > failed to load /usr/lib/libvisual/transform Nothing harmful, point is that there are no transform plugins yet, so the directory isn't created :). > Just earlier this month - GStreamer put out a bunch of updates, and the > libvisual plugins worked in totem again - I haven't tried with the > 0.2.0 libvisual, but if there is a problem - then I'm guessing that's a > GStreamer-plugins patch that would be needed. I think they'll have to update. > I'll try that tomorrow afternoon (rebuild the libvisual gstreamer > plugin and see if it builds and works) > > But other than the makefile issue in the rpm specfile with where the > plugins go, it seems to work. Attached is that specfile. Thanks a lot for testing, this is much appreciated! Cheerios, Dennis |