From: Duilio J. P. <dp...@fc...> - 2004-10-22 22:54:00
|
Dennis wrote on another thread: > Maybe it's better to use #defines for setting version anyway, so we have > more control regarding that, I'd like to do a 0.2.0 to sign it's > significancy, and because it will be major API incompatible. > > > Other possibility would be to introduce libtool versioning right now, > > but I think is not the moment yet. Remember the current:revision:age > > scheme of libtool (which is reflected on the package number). 'current' > > must be incremented every time you change an actual API function, and > > that will happen for a while on libvisual, so we will have > > libvisual-10.0.4 really soon :-) > > Maybe we should use a different versioning scheme after all... not sure Of course versioning system could be controlled during configure time, through pkg-config. In fact there are so many things in common between libtool and pkg-config objectives, that libtool project's people are thinking about 'merge' the two projects someway. Anyway, we can control versions entirely through pkg-config, we just must very strict about this on any new release (specially when some day became projects using libvisual outside our own). Bye, Duilio. |