From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-10-15 13:41:55
|
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:35 +0200, Burkhard Plaum wrote: > >>>* Gtk1 and Gtk2 VisUI builder. > >> > >>This surprise me. I was believed that final UI building would be > >>responsibility of the programmer. > > > > It is, but since we have to write these widgets anyway, in gtk1 for > > xmms and in gtk2 for bmp, I don't think it hurts to generalise them > > in a separated libvisual-widgets package, so everyone can use them > > easily. Aka that way we make the code reusable. > > And users always have the same configuration dialogs, > no matter what application they use. Yeah, this is especially important, probably even more important than ease of development, consistention. > >>>This is our plan of universal domination, anyone comments ? > > Maybe QT widgets? I personally hate KDE/Qt but many people don't. I'm not a KDE user, but I don't hate it, everyone has their freedom of choice, and I'd like to see us everywhere, we're 'neutral' so to say. I think amarok would really like to have a QT config widget for libvisual, tho they should look into that themself :), because I'm just completely QT clueless.. heheh! Cheers, Dennis |