From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-10-11 22:24:44
|
It really should not indeed, never noticed that it was doing so. If you can fix this for me, please do so! The libvisual core doesn't need any GLness anyway. On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:58 +0300, Vitaly V. Bursov wrote: > Hi, > > I think Libvisual should not be linked to libGL. It's not right > to link with libGL anyway - it's a kinda driver and it is different > for different hardware (and different driver versions, for NVIdia). > > I'm not sure if somebody wants (I don't) to recompile GL programs > on driver or hardware update. Libvisual itself has nothing to do > with OpenGL, right? > > It would be Much better if, say, Libvisual can dynamicaly load libGL > library and import its functions naming them smth like: lvglBegin() > etc. > > Comments? > |