From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-10-03 21:16:51
|
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 18:17 -0300, Duilio Javier Protti wrote: > Ok, this is a good possibility. Another one would be to still raising > an error after showing the error message, but allow setting the error > handler, maybe adding to lv_libvisual module: > > void visual_set_error_handler (...); > > and a private function like: > > void lv_abort(); > > Probably this approach would be more flexible. I'm not sure, I personally favor, to just do it in the error_message handler. I don't think this is a part of libvisual we want to overcomplex, and doing it in the message handler is still very flexible. What do others think ?? :) Cheers, Dennis |