From: salsaman <sal...@xs...> - 2004-09-16 21:18:36
|
Dennis Smit wrote: >On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 13:01 +0200, Niels Elburg wrote: > > >>The OpenSoundControl protocol >>(http://www.cnmat.berkeley.edu/OpenSoundControl/) would make a great >>extension to libvisual. >> >>Using the OSC would bring a few benefits to libvisual: >> 1. Flexible (external/remote) control of libvisual plugins >> 2. Application programmers dont have to hardcode parameter/event handling >> but can send messages to libvisual actor/plugin instead >> >> > >Well, generally OSC is 'just another bus system' and a unknown one. >I don't really like depending on this. I'm very wary with depending >on 'cool' stuff. Since it can easily crack up the lib. > >Cheers, >Dennis > >(sorry for my somewhat short answer, kinda tired) > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 >Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on >who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. >Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php >_______________________________________________ >Libvisual-devel mailing list >Lib...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libvisual-devel > > > > My suggestion was to use a wrapper - rather like the livido wrapper will be for actors. Just have a little routine that is waiting for a kick trigger from libvisual. Then the routine can handle registering hosts and sending the OSC messages. Salsaman. |