From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-07 16:24:12
|
I always reason in the following way: 'is this object going to be interfaced by a commercial vendor ?' if the answer is 'yes' I release it like LGPL, if 'no' I use GPL. But (on irc) you prefered LGPL so that is totally alright :) You don't have to add me as an author seen helping those who use our library is the most logical step todo :) anyway if you insist: Dennis Smit <sy...@yo...> (and you want to add Duilio as well ofcourse) which is: Duilio J. Protti <dp...@us...> (if I'm not wrong). Cheers, Dennis On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 18:18 +0100, salsaman wrote: > Hi, > do any of you have any preference on the type of license for > libvisual/livido ? livido.h itself will be LGPL, and i would only be > happy with releasing this new wrapper as GPL or as LGPL. I guess we > should make it LGPL in keeping with libvisual. > > Also, i need an Authors: list for those who have helped me, to add to > the comments. > > Salsaman. |