Re: [Libvisual-devel] Re: libvisual

[Dennis S. <sy...@yo...>]

On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 23:20 -0300, Duilio Javier Protti wrote:
> > Ok great, This works like a charm, is it better to use symlinks
> > for programs like depcomp, install-sh etc etc ?
> 
> symlinks are better to save some disk space, and to point to the
> last version.

Isn't it safer to not use symlinks for the final package ?

> > It would be superB if you could also port both libvisual-plugins
> > to automake-1.8, 
> 
> I have been working on that. However, due to the broken distro
> (all the headers are missing), I cannot full-test the building
> process. I will send you the updated package and you must
> copy the headers and test it.

To include the headers next time in dist I should add them to the
sources right ?

> > I will also move the current ChangeLog to NEWS and then we can use
> > the ChangeLog as a real per commit base ChangeLog.
> 
> mhmm... I think the current ChangeLog is right for CVS,
> and NEWS file must kept info on a per-release basis.
Yep.

I'll try to get libvisual into sf.net cvs today and when everything is
fixed dist wise, we'll be doing a new release to fix my previous major
screw up... Do you agree with this ?

Cheers,
Dennis