Menu
▾
▴
libvisual-devel
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-28 22:20:57
|
Heya, not sure if it's useful, but I made some banners that might be used in the website it's banner rotation: http://www.plasser.nl/synap/libvisual/banners/ Let me know what you think. Cheers, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-29 06:29:39
|
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 23:20, Dennis Smit wrote: > Heya, not sure if it's useful, but I made some banners that might be > used in the website it's banner rotation: > > http://www.plasser.nl/synap/libvisual/banners/ > > > Let me know what you think. Good; they're quite wide (I've been planning for 800x600 resolutions, too) but it doen't matter too much. Besides, it might be possible to find some way to detect and change according to resolution, although that's possibly going too far ;) . |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-29 08:29:46
|
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:29 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > On Tuesday 28 September 2004 23:20, Dennis Smit wrote: > > Heya, not sure if it's useful, but I made some banners that might be > > used in the website it's banner rotation: > > > > http://www.plasser.nl/synap/libvisual/banners/ > > > > > > Let me know what you think. > > Good; they're quite wide (I've been planning for 800x600 resolutions, too) but > it doen't matter too much. Besides, it might be possible to find some way to > detect and change according to resolution, although that's possibly going too > far ;) Aah alright, :) maybe you can just load them, and if the resolution is too low just 'cut off' the right side. (that is possible right, in html ? ) Cheers and thanks, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-29 11:31:20
|
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 09:29, Dennis Smit wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:29 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 September 2004 23:20, Dennis Smit wrote: > > > Heya, not sure if it's useful, but I made some banners that might be > > > used in the website it's banner rotation: > > > > > > http://www.plasser.nl/synap/libvisual/banners/ > > > > > > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > Good; they're quite wide (I've been planning for 800x600 resolutions, > > too) but it doen't matter too much. Besides, it might be possible to find > > some way to detect and change according to resolution, although that's > > possibly going too far ;) > > Aah alright, :) maybe you can just load them, and if the resolution is > too low just 'cut off' the right side. (that is possible right, in > html ? ) Hmm, I'm not sure, although I wouldn't be surprised. I'll have ago. |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-29 11:42:54
|
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:31 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Aah alright, :) maybe you can just load them, and if the resolution is > > too low just 'cut off' the right side. (that is possible right, in > > html ? ) > > Hmm, I'm not sure, although I wouldn't be surprised. I'll have ago. Alright, sounds good... We want to do a release upcoming monday, Do you think it's possible to have (atleast) a static version ready before then ? (if not, it's no problem). Cheers, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-29 11:59:15
|
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 12:42, Dennis Smit wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:31 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > > Aah alright, :) maybe you can just load them, and if the resolution is > > > too low just 'cut off' the right side. (that is possible right, in > > > html ? ) > > > > Hmm, I'm not sure, although I wouldn't be surprised. I'll have ago. > > Alright, sounds good... > > We want to do a release upcoming monday, Do you think it's possible > to have (atleast) a static version ready before then ? (if not, it's > no problem). Oh, definitely. I'll probably get most of the next lot of work done tonight, so I'd say getting at least a static site up by monday is a near-definite possibility. There's just the matter of getting more icons, the banners and the CMS. In fact, I'm about to have a go at the banners now. Andrew |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-29 12:14:57
|
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:59 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Oh, definitely. I'll probably get most of the next lot of work done tonight, > so I'd say getting at least a static site up by monday is a near-definite > possibility. > > There's just the matter of getting more icons, the banners and the CMS. In > fact, I'm about to have a go at the banners now. > > Andrew This is so fantastic! Do you have an sf.net acount so I can add you to the team as webdeveloper ? Cheers, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-29 13:04:12
|
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 13:14, Dennis Smit wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:59 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Oh, definitely. I'll probably get most of the next lot of work done > > tonight, so I'd say getting at least a static site up by monday is a > > near-definite possibility. > > > > There's just the matter of getting more icons, the banners and the CMS. > > In fact, I'm about to have a go at the banners now. > > > > Andrew > > This is so fantastic! > > Do you have an sf.net acount so I can add you to the team as > webdeveloper ? > Yep, my username is andrewgodwin (I'm really inventive). You can't crop stuff in HTML (save for some strange MS extensions in IE, and I'm not going to use those, since they wont work), so I've had to try cropping/fading manually... have a look at http://bytehoard.ath.cx/libvisualtest for an idea. For some reason, the image isn't loading in firefox, but Konqueror's fine, so I'm trying to solve that... it might just be a bad ff cache or something. It just fits on my narrow screen (double-wide taskbar at right, universal sidebar at left), so that's OK. |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-29 16:22:52
|
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 14:04 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Yep, my username is andrewgodwin (I'm really inventive). I've added you to the team. > You can't crop stuff in HTML (save for some strange MS extensions in IE, and > I'm not going to use those, since they wont work), so I've had to try > cropping/fading manually... have a look at > http://bytehoard.ath.cx/libvisualtest for an idea. As it is right now looks perfectly! > For some reason, the image isn't loading in firefox, but Konqueror's fine, so > I'm trying to solve that... it might just be a bad ff cache or something. It > just fits on my narrow screen (double-wide taskbar at right, universal > sidebar at left), so that's OK. Hmms it's loading great in mozilla at my place... Thanks, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-29 13:15:18
|
After having a look around, it seems the best options are either Mambo or a custom CMS. Mambo is perhaps a bit overblown for your site, but it's easily extendable and has things like RSS built in, while if I make one out of my libraries it may not have RSS for a few days, but it's going to be more suited for your needs and enable us to do the banner stuff correctly. I'm going to start trying a custom one locally; the SF databases are quite slow (actually, you'll probably need to get one created if you haven't already), but I can copy everything over once it's done. Andrew |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-29 16:23:57
|
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 14:15 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > After having a look around, it seems the best options are either Mambo or a > custom CMS. Mambo is perhaps a bit overblown for your site, but it's easily > extendable and has things like RSS built in, while if I make one out of my > libraries it may not have RSS for a few days, but it's going to be more > suited for your needs and enable us to do the banner stuff correctly. Well since we won't ever need a full blown CMS system, maybe it's better to have our own small CMS system. > I'm going to start trying a custom one locally; the SF databases are quite > slow (actually, you'll probably need to get one created if you haven't > already), but I can copy everything over once it's done. What created !?, I'm not sure what you mean here :) Cheers, Dennis |
|
From: Andrew G. <and...@bl...> - 2004-09-30 06:31:03
|
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:23, Dennis Smit wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 14:15 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > After having a look around, it seems the best options are either Mambo or > > a custom CMS. Mambo is perhaps a bit overblown for your site, but it's > > easily extendable and has things like RSS built in, while if I make one > > out of my libraries it may not have RSS for a few days, but it's going to > > be more suited for your needs and enable us to do the banner stuff > > correctly. > > Well since we won't ever need a full blown CMS system, maybe it's better > to have our own small CMS system. OK, work's already started. The menus are already working off a DB. > > > I'm going to start trying a custom one locally; the SF databases are > > quite slow (actually, you'll probably need to get one created if you > > haven't already), but I can copy everything over once it's done. > > What created !?, I'm not sure what you mean here :) > You have to opt-in for a MySQL database at SourceForge. The admin has to set it up and set a password for it. As for the mozilla thing, I can''t make heads or tails of it. Mozilla's fine, but firefox isn't... I'll try ff on another computer. Andrew |
|
From: Dennis S. <sy...@yo...> - 2004-09-30 15:58:14
|
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 07:30 +0100, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > > I'm going to start trying a custom one locally; the SF databases are > > > quite slow (actually, you'll probably need to get one created if you > > > haven't already), but I can copy everything over once it's done. > > > > What created !?, I'm not sure what you mean here :) > > > You have to opt-in for a MySQL database at SourceForge. The admin has to set > it up and set a password for it. Aah ok, where to do that ? Dennis. |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X