I always reason in the following way:
'is this object going to be interfaced by a commercial vendor ?'
if the answer is 'yes' I release it like LGPL, if 'no' I use GPL.
But (on irc) you prefered LGPL so that is totally alright :)
You don't have to add me as an author seen helping those who
use our library is the most logical step todo :) anyway
if you insist: Dennis Smit <sy...@yo...> (and you
want to add Duilio as well ofcourse)
which is: Duilio J. Protti <dp...@us...>
(if I'm not wrong).
Cheers,
Dennis
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 18:18 +0100, salsaman wrote:
> Hi,
> do any of you have any preference on the type of license for
> libvisual/livido ? livido.h itself will be LGPL, and i would only be
> happy with releasing this new wrapper as GPL or as LGPL. I guess we
> should make it LGPL in keeping with libvisual.
>
> Also, i need an Authors: list for those who have helped me, to add to
> the comments.
>
> Salsaman.
|
